Family and Clinician Perceptions of Pragmatic Communication Skills Following Right Hemisphere Stroke

REFERENCES

• Ball, M.J., Davies, E., Duckworth, M., & Middlehurst, R. (1991). Assessing the assessments: A comparison of two clinical pragmatic profiles. Journal of Communication Disorders, 24, 367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E. (1976). Language in context. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, E., & Bryan, K. (1996). Right cerebral hemisphere damage: Incidence of language problems. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 19, 47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomert, L. (1995). Who's the "expert"? Amateur and profes-sional judgment of aphasic communication. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2(3), 64–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blonder, L., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. (1991). The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain, 114,1115–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M.S. (1985). Language without communication: The pragmatics of right hemisphere damage. In M.S. Burns, A.S. Halper, & S.I. Mogil (Eds.), Clinical management of right hemisphere dysfunction. Rockville, MD: Aspen Sys-tems.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney, L.R., & Halper, A.S. (1994). An assessment tool for evaluating cognitive-communicative problems in patients with right hemisphere damage: Preliminary findings. Top-ics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 1(2), 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, G.A. (1993). A survey of adult aphasia and related language disorders (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Foldi, N.S. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemi-sphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 31, 88–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, T. (1994). Pragmatic communication disorders following stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 1(2), 52–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldsmith, T., & Mackisack, E.L. (1992, November). Cur-rent practice in pragmatics assessment: National survey results. Paper presented at the American Speech-Lan-guage-Hearing Association Convention, San Antonio, TX. Halper, AS., Burns, M.S., Cherney, L.R., & Mogil, S.I. (1991). RIC evaluation of communication problems in right hemisphere dysfunction-Revised (RICE-2). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Halper, AS., & Mogil, S.I. (1986). Communication disor-ders: Diagnosis and treatment. In P.E. Kaplan & L.J. Cerullo (Eds.), Stroke rehabilitation. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Helmick, J.W., Watamori, T.S., & Palmer, J.M. (1976). Spouses' understanding of the communication abilities of aphasic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disor-ders, 41,238–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland, A. (1977). Comment on "Spouses' understanding of the communication disabilities of aphasic patients." Jour-nal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 307–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M. (1990). Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain damage: Theme organiza-tion. Brain and Language, 38, 253–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J. (1989). Informative content of narrative discourse in right brain-damaged right-handers. Brain and Language, 29, 81–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J.A., Brownell, H.H., Jacobs, J.R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language, 38, 315–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghab, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness in-dex: Development and psychometric evaluation of a func-tional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers, P.S. (1994). Communication disorders associated with right-hemisphere brain damage. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P.S., & Mackisack, E.L. (1990). Right hemisphere syndrome. In L.L. LaPointe (Ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. New York: Thieme Medi-cal Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Newhoff, M., & Apel, K. (1990). Impairments inpragmatics. In L. LaPointe (Ed.), Aphasia andrelated neurogenic language disorders. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (1988). The profiling of syntax and pragmatics in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 2, 179–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. (1982). Observational protocol for pragmatic behaviors. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California. Prutting, C.A., & Kirchner, D.M. (1987). A clinical appraisal ofthe pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E.D., & Mesulum, M.M. (1979). Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Archives of Neurology, 36, 561–569.
   Google Scholar
• Starkstein, SE., Federoff, J.P., Price, T.R., Leiguarda, R.C., & Robinson, R.G. (1994). Neuropsychological and neuroradiologic correlates of emotions prosody compre-hension. Neurology, 44, 515–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M.M., & Kramer, L. (1981). Distur-bances in prosody: A right-hemisphere contribution to language. Archives of Neurology, 38, 742–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar