Brief Cognitive Assessment and Prediction of Functional Outcome in Stroke

REFERENCES

• Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986;17:765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: U. Prognosis. Scott Med]. 1957;2:200–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz S, Ford AB, Chinn AB, Newill VA. Part II: Long term course of 159 patients. Medicine. 1966;45:236–246.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson TP, Boursestom N, Greenberg FR, Hildyard VG. Predictive factors in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1974;55:545–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke out-come: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1994;25:808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeminez J, Morgan P. Predictive improvement in stroke patients referred for inpatient rehabilita-tion. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1481–1484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruell JH, Simon il. Development of objec-tive predictors of recovery in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1960;41: 564–569.
   Google Scholar
• Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M. Factors influencing stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1971;3:213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan J, Hier D. Visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke. Am] Occup Ther. 1982;36:314–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertanu JS, Demopoulos JT, Yang WC, Calhoun WF, Fenigstein HA. Stroke rehabili-tation: correlation and prognostic value of computerized tomography and sequential functional assessments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:505–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll D. The disability in hemiplegia caused by cerebrovascular disease: serial studies of 98 cases.] Chronic Dis. 1962;15: 179–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaste M, Waltimo O. Prognosis of patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 1976;7:482–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Skilbeck CF, Langton Hewer R. Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabil-itation. Stroke. 1989;21:241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Orientation in the acute and chronic stroke patient: impact of ADL and social activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:336–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatemichi TK, Desmond YS, Paik MS, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to func-tional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker J. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients: the dominant role of higher-order cognition. Stroke. 1993;24:1794–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clini-cians. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysiw WJ, Beegan JG, Gatens PF. Prospective cognitive assessment of stroke patients before inpatient rehabilitation: the relationship of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination to functional improvement. Am] Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;68:168–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern California Neurobehavioral Group, Inc. Manual for COGNISTAT: The Neuro-behavioral Cognitive Status Examination. Fairfax, CA: Northern California Neuro-behavioral Group; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs JW, Bernhard MR, Delgado A, Strain JJ. Screening for organic mental syndromes in the medically ill. Ann Intern Med. 1977; 86:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: neu-ropsychological testing of adults. Considerations for neurologists. Neurology. 1996;47:592–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Gale SD, Diamond PT. Early assessment of post-stroke patients entering acute inpatient rehabilitation: utility of the WAS! and HVLT-R. Am] Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:223–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph C. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wilk CM, Gold JM, Bartko JJ, et al. Test-retest stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in schizophrenia. Am I Psychiatry. 2002;159: 838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold JM, Queern C, Lannone VN, Buchanan RW. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, I: Sensitivity, reliability and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1937–1950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart MP, Goldberg R, Bartko JJ, Gold JM. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: Convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. Am] Psychiatry. 1999;156:1951–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon K, Terryberry-Spohr L, List Kalnins T. Predicting Rehabilitation Outcome Using Full and Reduced Versions of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuro-psychological Status (RBANS). Poster presen-tation at: Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society; February 1999; Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Terryberry-Spohr L, Gordon K, List Kalnins T. Prediction of Functional Outcomes in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting Using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Poster presentation at: Meeting of National Academy of Neuropsychology; November 1999; San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielzny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore: Brookes; 1987:137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75: 127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB. Measurement of stroke rehabilitation outcome in the 1980s. Stroke. 1990;21\(suppl 1):46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, Kayton RM. Interrater agreement of the seven level functional independence measure (FIM). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:790.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Aging. 1983;12:166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton-Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuling J, deHaan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assess-ment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Eklund M, Fugl-Meyer KS. Vocational rehabilitation in Northern Sweden III: Aspects of life satisfaction. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23:83–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charliufe SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Guide for Use of the CHART: Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charliufe SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term reha-bilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Boudewijn JK, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke-A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25:479–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. BIGSTEPS for PC Compatibles. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Denmark's Paedogigiske Institute; 1960. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig Hospital Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): Metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord In] RehabiL 1998;4:16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hoye W, Thompson RN, Sherer M, Nick T, Gaines C, Collip D, Vohra R. Brief cognitive assessment after stroke: RBANS factor struc-ture and performance patterns [abstract). J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:138.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht GL, Devlieger Pi. The disability par-adox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:977–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzini L, Johnson WS, Hoffman WF. Correlates of suffering in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 1999;52:1434–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns KA, Mateer CA. Walking and chewing gum: the impact of attentional capacity on everyday activities. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:147–170.
   Google Scholar
• Cubic BA, Gouvier W. The ecological validi-ty of perceptual tests. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuro-psychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Crosson B. Assessment of subtle language deficits in neuropsychological batteries: strate-gies and implications. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Pendleton MG. Use of neuropsy-chological tests to predict patients' everyday functioning. I Consult Clin Psychol. 1981;49: 807–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelune GJ, Moehle KA. Neuropsychological assessment and everyday functioning. In: Wedding D, Horton AM, Webster J, eds. The Neuropsychology Handbook (pp. 489–525). New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1986:489–525.
   Google Scholar
• Acker MB. A review of the ecological validi-ty of neuropsychological tests. In: Tupper DE, Cicerone KD, eds. The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and Basic Competencies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press; 1990:19–55.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein G. Functional considerations in neu-ropsychology. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:75–89.
   Google Scholar