Robotic Devices for Movement Therapy After Stroke: Current Status and Challenges to Clinical Acceptance

REFERENCES

• Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines. No. 16. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1995. Publication AHCPR 95–0662.
   Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. The economic impact of stroke. Neurol. 1995;45(Suppl 1):56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia Evaluation and Treatment. 2nd ed. London: Heinemann; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke. London: Heinemann Medical Books; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Schmit BD, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ. Stretch reflex adaptation in elbow flexors during repeated passive movements in unilateral brain-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(3):269–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA. Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science. 1982;217(4562): 855–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of reha-bilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269): 1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replica-tion. Stroke. 1999;30(3):586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physi-cal rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36(3):237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, WeiIler C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31(6):1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind random-ized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30(11): 2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 1995;130(1):59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29(1):3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parry RH, Lincoln NB, Vass CD. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13 (3):187–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371–401.
   Google Scholar
• Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke. 1998; 29(4):785–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6(1):75–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volpe BT Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OTR L, DieIs C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensori-motor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54(10): 1938–1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, DieIs CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1874–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research syn-thesis. Stroke. 1997;28(8):1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S. The results of clin-ical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch NeuroL 1993;50(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: More is better? Physiot her Res Int. 1996;1(2):75–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor P, Van der Loos HFM. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experi-ence.] Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):663–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional thera-py techniques for the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dewald JPA, Rymer WZ. Guidance based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: A pilot study. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999;7:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole AN, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: Progress with the ARM Guide. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:653–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Ann Biomed Eng. 1999;27:805–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn L, Averbuch M, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reach-ing in chronic hemiparesis. Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference; 2001; Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn LE, Averbuch M, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Comparison of robot-assisted reaching to free reaching in promot-ing recovery from chronic stroke. In: Mokhtari M, ed. Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age. Amsterdam: 105 Press; 2000:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Takahashi CD, Timoszyk WK, Reinkensmeyer AN, Kahn LE. Design of robot assistance for arm movement therapy following stroke. Adv Robotics. 2000;14: 625–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney RM, Van der Loos HFM, Lum PS, Burgar CG. Robotic stroke therapy assistant. Robotica. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Protas E, Holmes S, Qureshy H, Johnson A, Lee D, Sherwood A. Supported treadmill ambulation training after spinal cord injury: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH, Harkema S, Requejo P, Edgerton VR. Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurol Rehabil. 1995;9(4):183–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wernig A, Nanassy A, Muller S. Laufband (treadmill) therapy in incomplete paraplegia and tetraplegia. J Neurotrauma. 1999;16(8): 719–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbeau H, Norman K, Fung J, Visintin M, Ladouceur M. Does neurorehabilitation play a role in the recovery of walking in neuro-logical populations? Ann NY Acad Sci. 1998;860:377–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman AL, Harkema Si. Locomotor train-ing after human spinal cord injury: A series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000;80(7):688–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D. A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):701–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo G, berg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar