A Set of Observational Measures for Rating Support and Participation in Conversation Between Adults with Aphasia and Their Conversation Partners

REFERENCES

• Holland A, Frattali C, Fromm D. Communicative Abilities in Daily Living (CADL-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Penn C. The profiling of syntax and pragmatics in aphasia. Clin Ling Phonetics. 1988;2:179–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S, Elbard H, Finlayson A, Zoghaib C. The communicative effectiveness index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult apha-sia. I Speech Hearing Disord. 1989;54:113–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prutting CA, Kirchner DM. Applied pragmatics. In: Gallagher T, Prutting CA, eds. Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention Issues in Language. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1983:29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sarno MT. Functional Communication Profile: Manual of Directions (Rehabilitation Monograph 42). New York, NY: University Medical Center; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Frattali CM, Thomson CK, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM. Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults: ASHA FACS. Rockville, MD: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, LeBlanc K. Motivating for infrastructure change: toward a communicatively accessible, par-ticipation-based stroke care system for all those affected by aphasia. I Commun Disord. 2002;35: 153–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byng S, Pound C, Parr S. Living with aphasia: a framework for therapy interventions. In: Papathanasiou I, ed. Acquired Neurological Communication Disorders: A Clinical Perspective. London, UK: Whurr Publishers; 2000:49–75.
   Google Scholar
• Elman RJ. Memories of the "plateau": health-care changes provide an opportunity to redefine apha-sia treatment and discharge. Aphasiology. 1998;12:227–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey E, Rogers M, Olswang L. Family based inter-vention for chronic aphasia. Presented at: the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1995; Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Holland AL. Some practical considerations in the treatment of aphasic patients. In: Sullivan M, Kommers M, eds. Rationale for Adult Aphasia Therapy. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press; 1977:167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Gailey GF. Functional is not enough: training conversation partners for aphasic adults. In: Holland AL, Forbes MM, eds. Aphasia Treatment: World Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1993:199–225.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Cohen-Schneider R. Groups in the "Introductory Program" at the Pat Arato Aphasia Centre. In: Elman RJ, ed. Group Treatment of Neurogenic Communication Disorders: The Expert Clinician's Approach. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999:97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Philosophical, practical and evaluative issues associated with "Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia": a reply. Aphasiology. 1998;12(9):851–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LPAA Project Group. Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, VVilliams & Wilkins; 2001:23–245. (originally published in the Asha Leader, Volume 5,2000)
   Google Scholar
• Lyon JG. Coping with Aphasia. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S, Ireland C. Talking About Aphasia: Living with Loss of Language After Stroke. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson R, Paul M, Wells A, Hoen B, Thelander M. Aphasia: A New Life. Handbook for Helping Communites. Stoufville, Ontario, Canada: York-Durham Aphasia Centre; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Penn C. Aphasia therapy in South Africa: some pragmatic and personal perspectives. In: Holland AL, Forbes MM, eds. Aphasia Treatment: World Perspectives. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1993:25–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pound C. Therapy for life: finding new paths across the plateau. Aphasiology. 1998;12:222–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno M. Quality of life in aphasia in the first post-stroke year. Aphasiology. 1997;11:665–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan L. "Diversity in aphasiology": a social science perspective. Aphasiology. 1998;12(6):474–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S, Byng S. Breaking new ground in familiar ter-ritory: a response to "Supported conversation for adults with aphasia" by Aura Kagan. Aphasiology. 1998;12:839–844.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N. Social approaches to the man-agement of aphasia. In: Worral L, Frattali C, eds. Neurogenic Communication Disorders: A Functional Approach. New York: Thieme; 2000:162–187.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N. A solution to the discharge dilemma in aphasia: social approaches to aphasia management. Aphasiology. 1998;12(3):231–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training con-versation partners (lead article in Clinical Forum). Aphasiology. 1998;12(9):816–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London, UK: Macmillan; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: a challenge to health professionals. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1995;2:15–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons NN. An Ethnographic Investigation of Compensatory Strategies in Aphasia [dissertation]. The Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator S. Efficacy research issues in augmenta-tive and alternative communication. Panel presen-tation at: Annual American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention; 1997; Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Fox LE, Fried-Oken M. MC Aphasiology: Partnership for future research. ISAAC. 1996;12: 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon JG. Communicative partners: their value in re-establishing communication with aphasic adults. In: Prescott T, ed. Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J. Social role negotia-tion in aphasia therapy: competence, incompe-tence and conflict. In: Kovarsky D, Duchan J, Maxwell M, eds. Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Educational Interactions: Constructing (In)com-petence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbau m; 1999:313–341.
   Google Scholar
• Boles L. Conversation analysis as a dependent measure in communication therapy with four indi-viduals with aphasia. Asia Pacific I Speech Lang Hearing. 1997;2:43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A.Describingcompetence inaphasic/normal conversation. Clin Ling Phonetics. 1996;10:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger M, Damico JS. Spontaneous verbal repetition: a social strategy in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology. 1998;12:971–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black S, Duchan IF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation part-ners using "Supported conversation for adults with aphasia": a controlled trial. I Speech Lang Hearing Res. 2001;44(3):624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn L. Training 6th year medical students in the use of supportive communication strategies in obtaining a case history from adults with aphasia: preliminary findings [unpublished undergraduate thesis]. University of Cape Town; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and evaluation (unpublished dis-sertation). University of Toronto; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon JK: Measuring outcomes in aphasia: bridg-ing the gap between theory and practice...or burn-ing our bridges. Aphasiology. 1997;11:845–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J. Intervention out-comes: clinical application of qualitative methods. Top Lang Disord. 2001;22:21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byng S, Kay J, Edmundson A, Scott C. Aphasia tests reconsidered. Aphasiology. 1990;4:67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman R. Multimethod research: a search for under-standing. In: Lemme ML, ed. Clinical Aphasiology, vol 23. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed; 1995:77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Damico J, Simmons-Mackie N, Schweitzer LA. Addressing the third law of gardening: method-ological alternatives in aphasiology. In: Lemme ML, ed. Clinical Aphasiology, vol 23. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed; 1995:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A. Communication strategies used by "good" versus "poor" speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology. 1999;13:807–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. http://www.who.int/icidh
   Google Scholar
• Lyon JG. Treating real-life functionality in a couple coping with severe aphasia. In: Helm-Estabrooks N, Holland A, eds. Approaches to the Treatment of Aphasia. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1997:203–239.
   Google Scholar