REFERENCES
- Examples of support groups found on an Internet search for "young stroke": Different Strokes: www.differentstrokes.co.uk; Young Stroke Survivors Support Group Cincinnati, Ohio, www.cyber-busi-ness-net.com/Young_Stroke_Survivors_Support/; Generation S: www.orgsites.com/pa/generation-s/; Young Enthusiastic Stroke Survivors: http://home-town.aol.com/suebeme/myhomepage/.
- American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics —2003 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2002.
- Alexander MR Stroke rehabilitation outcome: a potential use of predictive variables to establish lev-els of care. Stroke. 1994;25:128–134.
- Ergeletzis D, Kevorkian CG, Rintala D. Rehabilitation of the older stroke patient. AJPMR. 2002;81(12):881–889.
- Falconer JA, Naughton BJ, Strasser DC, Sinacore JM. Stroke inpatient rehabilitation: a comparison across age groups. I Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:39–44.
- Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Di Francesco L, et al. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;100:202–208.
- Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1992; 23:978–982.
- Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi ML, et al. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing out-come. Stroke. 1984;15:1039–1044.
- Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Fowler RS Jr, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: outcome and prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:383–389.
- Macciocchi SN, Diamond PT, Alves WM, et al. Ischemic stroke: relation of age, lesion location, and initial neurologic deficit to functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:497–504.
- Nakayama H, Jorgenson HS, Rassachou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome: the Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke. 1994;25:808–813.
- Paolucci S, et al. Aging and stroke rehabilitation: a case-comparison study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15: 98–105.
- Sze KH, Wong E, Or KH, et al. Factors predicting stroke disability at discharge: a study of 793 Chinese. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:876–880.
- Weimar C, Ziegler A, Konig I, Diener H-C. Predicting functional outcome and survival after acute ischemic stroke. I Neurol. 2002;249:888–895.
- Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC, Richards, B, Laycock PJ. The influence of age on the clinical presentation and outcome of stroke. Int Rehabil Med. 1984;6:49–53.
- Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2002;33:179–185.
- Bourestom NC. Predictors of long term recovery in cerebrovascular disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967;48:415–419.
- Colantonio A, Kasl SV, Ostfeld AM, Berkman LF. Prestroke physical function predicts stroke out-comes in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(6):562–566.
- Feigenson JS, McCarthy ML, Greenberg SD, Feigenson WD. Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit, II: comparison of 318 screened and 248 unscreened patients. Stroke. 1977;8(6):657–662.
- Wade DT, Hewer R, Wood VA. Stroke: the influence of age upon outcome. Age Ageing. 1984;13:357–362.
- Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Fowler RS Jr, et al. Stroke: Does rehabilitation affect outcome? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:375-382.
- Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986;17:765–776.
- Ween JK, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabili-tation setting. Neurology. 1996;47:388–392.
- FIMTm is a trademark of the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, a division of UB Foundation Activities, Inc.
- Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
- Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, et al. Interrater agreement of the seven level functional independence measure (FIM) [abstract]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:790.
- Heinemann AW, Roth EJ, Cichowski K, Betts, H. Multivariate analysis of improvement and outcome following stroke rehabilitation. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:1167–1172.