Closing the Gap Between Research and Clinical Practice

REFERENCES

• Kamerow DB. Clinical evidence: creation, assess-ment, and implementation. Translating Evidence into Practice 1997, Conference Summary. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/tripl 997. Accessed on April 3,2000.
   Google Scholar
• Mowatt G, Lib D, Grimshaw JM, Davis DA, Mazmanian PE. Getting evidence into practice: the work of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC). I Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21(1):55–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, WS. Clinical judgment and evidence-based medicine. Translating Evidence into Practice 1998, Conference Summary. Agency for Health Care PolicyandResearch. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/tripl998/trip98a.htm. Accessed on December 10,2001.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock AS, Legg L, Langhorne P, Sellars C. Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O'Fallon WM, VViebers DO. Ischemic stroke: out-comes, patient mix, and practice variation for neu-rologists and generalists in a community. Neurology. 1998;50:1669–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebu! RD, Snow RJ, Pine R, Hertzer NR, Norris DG. Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid end arterectomy. JAMA. 1998;279:1282–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AJ, Huber J, Stason WB. Poststroke rehabilita-tion in older Americans: the Medicare experience. Med Care. 1996;34:811–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AJ, Huber JH, Stason WB. Factors contributing to practice variation in post-stroke rehabilitation. Health Serv Res. 1997; 32(2):197–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J, Toussaint L, Blackwell B. Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1047–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus LW, VVinemiller DR, Lingram VR, et al. Efficacy and side effects of methylphenidate for post-stroke depression. I Clin Psychiatry. 1992;53: 447–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee IT, Solomon NA, Heidenreich PA, Oehlert J, Garber AM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for carotid stenosis in asymptomatic persons. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guide-lines for using clinical and economic evaluations. Can Med Assoc J. 1992;146:473–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Wilson DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and suba-cute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke: a comparison of rehabilitation settings. JAMA. 1997;277:396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle ND. The experience of recovery following lacunar stroke. Rehabil Nurs. 1992;17:122–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folden SL. Managing the effects of a stroke: the first months. Rehabil Nurs Res. 1994; Fall:79–85.
   Google Scholar
• HafsteinsdOttir TB, Grypdonck M. Being a stroke patient: a review of the literature. I Adv Nurs. 1997;26:580–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrostimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the ran-domized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:549–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland JD, Thomson MA, Fuoco AR. Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleenbaker RE, Mainous AG III. Electromyo-graphic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeduca-tion in the hemiplegic stroke patient: a meta-analy-sis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1301–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, et al. Biofeedback therapy in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analy-sis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greener J, Langhorne P. Systematic reviews in reha-bilitation for stroke: issues and approaches to addressing them. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIHConsensus Development Panel onAcupuncture. Acupuncture: NIH Consensus Conference. JAMA. 1998;280:1518–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelick PB, Sacco RL, Smith DB, et al. Prevention of a first stroke: a review of guidelines and a multi-disciplinary consensus statement from the National Stroke Association. JAMA. 1999;281:1112–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 8. Diagnosis and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) in Acute-Care Stroke Patients, Summary. Agency for Healthcare Research and Policy. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epc-sums/dysphsum.htm. Accessed on October 8, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 49. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Echocardiography and Carotid Imaging in Management of Stroke, Summary. Agency for Healthcare Research and Policy. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/epcsums/stroke-mansum.htm. Accessed on November 4, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy DM. Evidence-based medicine: what have we learned? Translating Evidence into Practice 1997, Conference Summary. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/trip1997/trip1.htm#head1. Accessed on April 3, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 16: Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. US Dept of Health and Human Services, 1995. AHCPR publication 95–0662.
   Google Scholar
• Adelson R. Implementing guidelines: Designing and selecting effective strategies. Translating Evidence into Practice 1997, Conference Summary. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Available at: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/trip1997/trip4.htm. Accessed on September 30, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes SA, Duncan PW, Zimmerman MK. Review criteria for stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1112–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Brettle AJ, Grant MJ. Reviewing and selecting outcome measures for use in routine practice. I Eva/ Clin Pract. 1998;4: 339–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar