Brain Reorganization After Stroke

REFERENCES

• Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, et al. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke. 1996;27:1459–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintermark M, Reichart M, Thiran J-P, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomog-raphy, at the time of emergency room admis-sion, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:417–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroshetz WJ, Lev MH. Editorial cited on page 5. Stroke. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lev MH, Segal AZ, Farkas J, et al. Utility of perfusion-weighted CT imaging in acute mid-dle cerebral artery stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke. 2001;32: 2021–2028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warach S. Pushing the limits of spatial, tem-poral, and physiological resolution. The emerging roles of MRI in the investigation of acute human stroke. Paper presented at: Annual meeting of the AmericanNeurological Association; 2002; New York.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher M, Ratan R. New perspectives on developing acute stroke therapy. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer PW, Hunter GJ, Julian HE, et al. Predicting cerebral ischemic infarct volume with diffusion and perfusion MR imaging. Am Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1785–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevins A, Le J, Martin NK, Brichett P, et al. High resolution EEG: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and MRI integration meth-ods. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:337–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toro C, Matsumoto J, Deusch I G, et al. Source analysis of scalp-recorded movement-related electrical potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;86:167–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thatcher RW, Toro C, Pflieger ME, Hallett M. Human neural network dynamics using mul-timodal registration of EEG, PET, and MRI. In: Thatcher RW, Hallett M, Zeffiro T, et al., eds. FunctionalNeu roimaging:TechnicalFoundations. Orlando, FL: Academic; 1994: 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Wang B, Toro C, Wasserman EM, et al. Multimodal integration of electrophysiologi-cal data, and brain images: EEG, MEG, TMS, MRI, and PET. In: Thatcher RW, Hallett M, Zeffiro T, et al., eds. Functional Neuro-imaging: Technical Foundations. Orlando, FL: Academic; 1994:251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Kornhuber HH, Deecke L. Hirnpotentialän-derungen bei Willkurbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente poten-tia le. Pflugers Arch. 1965;284:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibasaki H, Barrett G, Halliday E, et al. Components of the movement-related poten-tials and their scalp topography. Elect roencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980;49:213–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boschert J, Deecke L. Cerebral potentials pre-ceding voluntary toe, knee and hip move-ments and their vectors in human precentral gyrus. Brain Res. 1986;376:175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshige R, Luders H, Shibasaki H. Recording of movement-related potentials from scalp and cortex in man. Brain. 1988;111: 719–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkka IM, Hallett M. Topography of scalp-recorded motor potentials in human finger movements. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;8: 331–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda A, Luders H, Burgess RC, Shibasaki H. Movement-related potentials recorded from supplementary motor area and primary motor area. Brain. 1992;115:1017-1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocker KBE, Brunia CHM, Cluitmans PJM. A spatio-temporal dipole model of the readi-ness potential in humans. I. Finger-move-ment. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:275–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miltner W, Braun C, Johnson R, et al. A test of brain electrical source analysis (BESA): a sim-ulation study. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:295–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ikeda A, Shibasaki H. Invasive recording of movement-related cortical potentials in humans. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;9: 509–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiller C, Juptner M, Fellows S, et al. Brain representation of active and passive move-ments. Neuroimage. 1996;105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alary F, Doyon B, Loubinoux I, et al. Event-related potentials elicited by passive move-ments in humans: characterization, source analysis, and comparison to fMRI. Neuroimage. 1998;377–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles G, Spiekermann G, Jueptner M, et al. Reorganization of sensory and motor systems in hemiplegic stroke patients. A positron emission tomography study. Stroke. 1999; 30(8):1510–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JB. An electromyographic study of mir-ror movements. Neurology. 1967;17:91–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JB. The role of the movement related cortical potentials (MRCPs) in the production of voluntary movements: normal controls and patients with spinal cord injury. Presented at: 53rd Annual Meeting of American Academy of Neurology; May 5, 2001; Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Rao SM, Binder JR, Bandettini BS, et al. Functional magnetic imaging of complex human movements. Neurology. 1993;43: 2311–2318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JB, Bialy Y, Sora E, Thatcher RW. An electroencephalographic study of imagined movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78:578–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilita-tive training in motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys. In: Ince L, ed. Behavioral Psychology and Rehabilitation. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371–401.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, LeCraw, DE, Barton LA, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reor-ganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JB, Bialy Y, Sora E, et al. Cortical sen-sorimotor reorganization after spinal cord injury; an EEG study. Neurology. 1998;50: 1115–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC, Mark A, Barquist K, et al. Motor cortex activation is preserved in patients with chronic hemiplegic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2002;52(5):607–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Mattay VS, Wieinberger DR, et al. Localized echo-volume imaging methods for functional MRI. I Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7(2):371–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelderen P, Ramsey NF, Liu G, et al. Three-dimensional functional magnetic reso-nance imaging of human brain on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(15):6906–6910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJS, et al. The func-tional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJS, et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganiza-tion in the human cerebral cortex after cap-sular infarction. Ann Neurol. 1993;181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28: 2518–2527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda M, Nagamine T, Fukuyama H, et al. Movement-related cortical potentials and regional cerebral blood flow change in patients with stroke after motor recovery. I Neurol Sci. 1997;146:117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanji J, Okano K, Sato KC. Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, con-tralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey.] Neurophysiol. 1988;60(1):325–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan PW, Smith MC. Effects of two unilat-eral cordotomies on the motility of the lower limbs. Brain. 1973;96(3):471–494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanes JN, Donoghue JP, Thangaraj V, et al. Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex. Science. 1995;268(5218):1775–1777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan M, Marchal, G, Viader F, et al. Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penum-bra. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:216–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ances BM, D'Esposito M. Neuroimaging of function after stroke: implications for rehabil-itation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000; 14:171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini PM, Caltagirone C, Castriota-Scanderbeg A, et al. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: a study with fMRI, MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport. 1998;9(9):2141–2146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JB, Sora E, Bialy Y, et al. Cortical motor reorganization after paraplegia: an EEG study. Neurology. 1999;53:736–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RG, van Donkelaar P. Mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. Can] Neurol Sci. 1995;22:257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs M, Wischmann HA, Wagner M, Drenckhahn R. Advanced biomagnetic and bioelectric reconstruction algorithms in supercomputing in brain research: from tomography to neural networks. World Scientific. 1995:161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Philips Electronics NV. Current reconstruc-tion and imaging. EEG software version 1996,2.0. Neuroscan. El Paso, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Green JB, Sora E, Bialy Y, Ricamato A. High-resolution EEG in post-stroke hemiparesis can identify ipsilateral generators during motor tasks. Stroke. 1999;30:2659–2665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar