Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: Theoretical Constructs, Item Generation, and Selection

REFERENCES

• De Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Langton-Hewer R, Van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke. 1993; 24:320–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen-Hill J, Gowland C. Client perspectives of educational needs following stroke. Unpublished manuscript; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, Tinson D, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57: 856–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitanen M, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bernspang B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in long term survi-vors after stroke. Scand I Rehabil Med. 1988;20: 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson MA, et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physi-cal therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Weerdt W, Lincoln NB, Harrison MA. Prediction of arm and hand function recovery in stroke patients. Intl Rehabil Res. 1987;10 (suppl 7):110–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prescott RJ, Garraway MB, Akhtar MB. Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. Stroke. 1982;13: 641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okkema KA, Culler KH. Functional evaluation of upper extremity use following stroke: a literature review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1998;4(4):54–75.
   Google Scholar
• McPhee SD. Functional hand evaluations: a review. Am I Occup Ther. 1987;41:158–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll D. A quantitative test of upper extremity function. I Chronic Dis. 1965;18:479–494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation and research. Intl Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching-Lin H, I-Ping H, Fu-Mei C, Po-Hsin L. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998;27:107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, DeGroot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. The intra- and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm Test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Management of the Post Stroke Arm and Hand: Treatment Recommendations of the 2001 Consensus Panel. Toronto: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario; 2001. Available at: www.heartandstroke.ca/profed/coordinatedstrokestrategy/rehabilita-tion
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay-Goddard R. Physical function outcome measurement in acute neurology. Phys Canada. 2000;52(2):138–145.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell I, Newell C. The theoretical and tech-nical foundations of health measurement. In: McDowell I, Newell C, eds. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: University Press; 1996:10–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Upper extremity retrain-ing following stroke: effects of bilateral practice. I Neurologic Rehabil. 1996;10(3):167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D, Konosky K, Fleharty K, Webb R, Newer K, Hazboun V. The effects of an occupationally embedded exercise on bilaterally assisted supina-tion in persons with hemiplegia. Am I Occup Ther. 1996;50(8):639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen P. Bilateral handskills in children with mild hemiplegia. Ped Occ Ther Practice. 1984;4(1):77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Andres FG, Mima T, Schulman AE, Dichgans J, Hallett M, Gerloff C. Functional coupling of human cortical sensorimotor areas during bimanual skill acquisition. Brain. 1999;122:855–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woolacott M. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. Baltimore, MD: Williams & VVilkins; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Exner C. Development of hand skills. In: Case-Smith J, ed. Occupational Therapy for Children. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001:289–328.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard CT. Neural control of head, eye, and upper extremity coordination. In: Leonard CT, ed. The Neuroscience of Human Movement. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1998:176–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ghez C. Voluntary movement. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JFI, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of Neural Science. New York: Elsevier Science; 1991:609–625.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Badke MB. Stroke: Recovery of Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Finlayson A, Gowland C, Basmajian J. Use of the Halstead Category Test as a cognitive predictor of functional recovery in the hemi-plegic upper limb: a cross-validation study. Clin Neuropsychologist. 1999;13:171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinuik RG. Motor skill performance and learn-ing: considerations for rehabilitation. Phys Canada. 1979;31:187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Process of recovery in stroke. In: Brandstater ME, Basmajian JV, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987:80–108.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder T. A process-oriented model of human motor behaviour: toward a theory-based rehabilita-tion approach. Phys Ther. 1991;71:157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein Cl. Motor learning considerations in stroke rehabilitation. In: Duncan PW, Badke MB, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1987:109–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel ER, Schwratz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Science; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Calvanio R, Levine D, Petrone P. Elements of cogni-tive rehabilitation after right hemisphere stroke. Behav Neurol. 1993;11:25–54.
   Google Scholar
• Turkheimer E, Yeo RA, Bigler ED. Basic relations among lesion laterality, lesion volume and neu-ropsychological performance. Neuropsychologia. 1990;28:1011–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hier DB, Mondlock J, Caplan LR. Recovery of behavioral abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology. 1983;33:345–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced (C.I.) move-ment techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3: 38–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Ochs MT, Allard T, Guic-Robles E. Functional reorganization of pri-mary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviourally controlled tactile stimulation. I Neurophys. 1990;63:82–104.
   Google Scholar
• Strick PL, Preston JB. Two representations of the hand in Area 4 of a primate. II. Somatosensory input organization. I Neurophys. 1982;48:150–159.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JA, Stoykov MEP. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1090–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Johnston MV. A random-ized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(3):233–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ. Imagery improves upper extremity motor function in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Occup Therap I Res. 2000;20(3):200–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeks J, Lankhorst G, Rumping K, Prevo A. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombovy ML. Rehabilitation and the course of recovery after stroke. In: Whisnant JP, ed. Stroke: Populations, Cohorts, and Clinical Trials. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C. Recovery of motor function follow-ing stroke: profile and predictors. Phys Canada. 1982;34:77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lin K, Wu C, Trombly C. Effects of task goal on movement kinematics and line bisection perfor-mance in adults without disabilities. Am I Occup Ther. 1997;52:179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson JM, Trombly CA. The effect of added-pur-pose and meaningful occupation on motor learn-ing. Am] Occup Ther. 1997;51:508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JFI, Shepherd RB, Nordholm A, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WorldHealthOrganization.InternationalClassifications of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: A Manual for Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• WorldHealthOrganization.InternationalClassification of Impairment, Disability and Handicap. Geneva: WHO; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Schickendanz H, Barreca S, Gowland C. Survey of upper extremity functional tasks in stroke patients. [abstract]. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Research Forum Day, McMaster University; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Deeg T, Earle D, Barreca S. Development of an upper extremity disability inventory-Phase 1. Poster Presentation at the School of Rehabilitation Science. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: McMaster University; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Norman G, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Functional Independence Measure (the FIM instru-ment). Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Including the TIM Instrument). Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1996:111–1–111–48.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar