Linking Treatment to Outcomes through Teams: Building a Conceptual Model of Rehabilitation Effectiveness

REFERENCES

• Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Critical literature review: Clinical effectiveness in allied health practices, (AHCPR Publication No. 94–0029). Rockville, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate, W.B., Miller, S.T., Graney, M.J., Elam, J.T., Burns, R., & Akins, D.E. (1990). A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabili-tation hospital. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 1,572–1,578.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D.S., & Evans, R.L. (1995). Families and stroke: The clinical implications of research findings. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2(2), 20–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Board of Governors, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1996). Editorial: Evolution and vision. Ar-chives ofPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(4), 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, R.A., & Szumal, J. (1993). Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations in organiza-tions: The reliability and validity of the organizational culture inventory. Psychology Reports, 72, 1,299–1,330.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, G.N. (1992). Who goes home after stroke: A case control study. NeuroRehabilitation, 2(2), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Diller, R. (1990). Fostering the interdisciplinary team, foster-ing research in a society in transition. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 275–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombovy, ML., Sandok, B.A., & Basford, J.R. (1986). Rehabilitation for stroke: A review. Stroke, 17, 363–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R.L., Bishop, D.S., Matlock, AL., & Noonan, W.C. (1987). Prestroke family interaction as a predictor of stroke outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilita-tion, 68, 508–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, J.A., Naughton, B.J., Dunlop, D.D., Roth, E.J., Strasser, D.C., & Sinacore, J.M. (1994). Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome using a classification tree approach. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilita-tion, 75, 619–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, J.A., Roth, E.J., Sutin, J.A., Strasser, D.C., & Chang, R.W. (1993). The critical path method in stroke rehabilitation: Lessons from an experiment in cost contain-ment and outcome improvement. Quality Review Bulletin, 8–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrell, M.P., Schmitt, M.H., & Heinemann, G.D. (1987). Assessing the validity of an index of team development. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Interdisciplinary Health Care Team Conference, State University of New York-Stoney Brook, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M.P., Schmitt, M.H., & Heinemann, G.D. (1988). Organizational environments of health care teams: Impact on team development and implications for consultation. International Journal of Small Group Research, 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M.P., Schmitt, M.H., & Heinemann, G.D. (1994). Social networks, team development, and the quality of team functioning in geriatric care. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Interdisciplinary Team Conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register (1985, July 31), 50(147), 31041.
   Google Scholar
• Fordyce, W. (1981). On interdisciplinary peers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 62, 51–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos, B.S. (1986). Conclusions and implications. In Organizational structure, problem solving and effectiveness, (pp. 283–303). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publish-ers.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, C.V., Hamilton, B.B., & Fiedler, R.C. (1992). Dis-charge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 23, 978–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritzer, G., & Arluke, A. (1985). The making of rehabilita-tion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, L.S. (1976). Team care in chronic illness: A critical review of the literature of the past 25 years. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 58, 507–511.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, L.S., Rintala, D.H., Kancellos, M., Griffin, B., Higgins, L., Rheinecker, S., Whiteside, W., & Healy, J.E. (1986). The innovative rehabilitation team: An experiment in team building. Archives of Physical Medicine and Reha-bilitation, 67, 357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada, N., Kominski, G., & Sofaer, S. (1993, Spring). Development of a resource-based patient classification scheme for rehabilitation. Inquiry, 30, 54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada, N., Sofaer, S., & Kominski, G. (1993). Functional status outcomes in rehabilitation: Implications for prospec-tive payment. Medical Care, 31, 345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, A., Hamilton, B.B., Linacre, J.M., Wright, B.D., & Granger, C.V. (1995). Functional status and therapeutic intensity during inpatient rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(4), 315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, G.D., Schmitt, M.H., & Farrell, M.P. (1994). The quality of geriatric team functioning: Model and methodol-ogy. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Interdisciplinary Team Conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, J.J. (1970). Professionalism, professionalization, and the interdisciplinary team. In Team practice and the specialists: An introduction to interdisciplinary teamwork (pp. 111–146). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M.V., & Miller, L.S. (1986). Cost-effectiveness of the Medicare three-hour regulation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 581–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, L. (1986). Prediction of function after stroke: A critical review. Stroke, 17, 765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, R.L. (1975). Interprofessional teamwork. InManpower Monograph Number Eight, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Uni-versity School of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R.L., Chen, Q., Blewett, L.A., & Sangl, J. (1996). Do rehabilitative nursing homes improve the outcomes of care? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44(6), 545–554.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith, R.A. (1991). The comprehensive treatment team in rehabilitation. Archives ofPhysical Medicine and Rehabili-tation, 72, 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, R.A. (1996). Treatment theory in the design and con-duct of medical rehabilitation outcomes research. In M.J. Fuhrer (Ed.), Medical rehabilitation outcomes research. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, R.A., & Breckenridge, K. (1985). Characteristics of patients from the hospital utilization project data system: 1980-1982. Archives ofPhysical Medicine and Rehabilita-tion, 66, 768–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, R.A., Wilson, D.B., & Gutierrez, P. (1995). Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: A comparison. Ar-chives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76(6), 495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, D.A., & Warren, M. (1984). The origins of British geriatrics. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 32, 253–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, G.E., Osberg, J.S., DeJong, G., Seward, M.L., & Branch, L.G. (1987). Predicting charges for inpatient medi-cal rehabilitation using severity, DRG, age, and function. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 826–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin, J. (1980). Interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary activities and the ACRM. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 62, 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Melvin, J. (1989). Status report on interdisciplinary medical rehab. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, R.H. (1994a). Group environment scale manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, R.H. (1994b). The social climate scales: A user's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31, 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberg, J.S., Haley, S.M., McGinnis, G.E., & DeJong, G. (1990). Characteristics of cost outliers who did not benefit from stroke rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher, K.J., & Jannell, S. (1993). The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Archives of Neurol-ogy, 50, 37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A.W. (1972). The team approach to primary health care. In Neighborhood health center seminar program (Monograph Series, No. 3, pp. 31–33. Berkeley, CA: School of Public Health, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, J.S. (1985). Rehabilitation team practice. In J. Lecca & J.S. McNeil (Eds.), Interdisciplinary teampractice: Issues and trends. (pp. 19–41). New York: Praeger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, L.Z., Josephson, KR., Wieland, D., English, PA., Sayer, J.A., & Kane, R.L. (1984). Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. New England Journal of Medi-cine, 311, 1,664–1,670.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, H.A. (1977). A world to care for: The autobiography of Howard A. Rusk, MD. New York: A Reader's Digest Press Book, Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M.H., Farrell, M.P., & Heinemann, G.D. (1988). Conceptual and methodological problems in studying the effects of interdisciplinary geriatric teams. Gerontologist, 28(6), 753–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M.H., Heinemann, G.D., & Farrell, M.P. (1994). Discipline differences in attitudes towards interdiscipli-nary teams, perceptions of the process of team work, and stress levels in geriatric health care teams. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Interdisciplinary Team Conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Shortell, S.M., O'Brien, J.L., Carman, J.M., Foster, R.W., Hughes, E.F.X., Boerstler, H., & O'Connor, E.J. (1995). Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/ total quality management: Concept versus implementation. Health Services Research, 30(2), 377–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortell, S.M., Rousseau, D.M., Gillies, R.R., Devers, K.J., & Simons, T.L. (1991). Organizational assessment in inten-sive care units: Construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU nurse-physician questionnaire. Medical Care, 29(8), 709–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortell, S.M., Zimmerman, J.E., Gillies, R.R., Duffy, J., Devers, K.J., Rousseau, D.M., & Knaus, W.A. (1992). Continuously improving patient care: Practical lessons and an assessment tool from the national ICU study. Quality Review Bulletin, 18, 150–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shortell, S.M., Zimmerman, J.E., Rousseau, D.M., Gillies, R.R., Wagner, D.P., Draper, E.A., Knaus, W.A., & Duffy, J. (1994). The performance of intensive care units: Does good management make a difference? Medical Care, 32(5), 508–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siller, J. (1969). Psychological situation of the disabled with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Literature, 30(10), 292–296.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman, M.G. (1995). Case-mix measurement in medical rehabilitation. Archives of PhysicalMedicine and Rehabili-tation, 76, 1,163–1,170.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman, M.G., Escarce, J.J., Hamilton, B.B., Granger, C.V., & Williams, S.V. (1994). A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Medical Care, 32, 366–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman, M.G., & Granger, C.V. (1994). Outcome studies and analysis: Principles of rehabilitation that influence outcome analysis. In G. Felsenthal, S.J. Garrison, & F.V. Steinberg (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the aging and elderly patient (pp. 511–522). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman, M.G., Hamilton, B.B., Goin, J.E., Granger, C.V., & Fiedler, R.C. (1996). Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories: Patterns re-vealed by function related groups. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75(1), 68-78. Strasser, D.C. (1988). Team leadership—who, what and how. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69(9), 717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, D.C. (1992). Geriatric rehabilitation: Perspectives from the United Kingdom. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 582–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, D.C., Falconer, J.A., & Martino-Saltzmann, D. (1994). The rehabilitation team: Staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environ-ment, and interprofessional relations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C., Ward, M., Chorba, C., & Kumiega, A. (1990). Measuring and interpreting. Journal of Nursing Adminis-tration, 20(6), 17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar