Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy: A Promising Restorative Outpatient Therapy

REFERENCES

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: A Report to Congress. Atlanta, GA: Author; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• American HeartAssociation. Stroke statistics [online]; 2000. Available from: http://www.americanheart.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/strokes.html
   Google Scholar
• Carr J, Shepherd R. Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher K. Cerebral vascular accident: some characteristics of occupational therapy evaluation forms. Am I Occup Ther 1980;34:268–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen MA, Mackay S, Duff SM, McCartney LC, O'Flaherty Si. Upper-limb function in Australian children with traumatic brain injury: a con-trolled, prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(5):642–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell A, Rosenbloom PS. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson JR, ed. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hilisdale, Ni: Erlbaum; 1981:1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trails to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Willis D, Phillips SA, Juby LC, Berman P. Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Stroke. 1996;27:18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay F, Ada L, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabili-tation: Are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1066-1070.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Cowell KS. Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:524–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL. Approaches to facilitating movement con-trol. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:v—vi.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page Si. Intensity versus task-specificity following stroke: How important is intensity? Am I Phys Med Rehabil. In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the central-ly paretic hand.] Neurol Sci. 1995;130(1):59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Brain plasticity as a basis of the devel-opment of rehabilitation procedures for hemiple-gia. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1982;13:73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto SA, Johnston MV, Levine P, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy in sub-acute stroke: a case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:286–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81 (11):870–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto SA, Johnston MV, Levine P, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy: a ran-domized, feasibility and efficacy study. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(5):583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath R. Efficacy of modified constraint induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single blinded randomized con-trolled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:14–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ. Forced use after TBI: promoting plasticity and function through practice. Manuscript submit-ted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Tower SS. Pyramidal lesions in the monkey. Brain. 1940;63:36–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lashley KS. Studies of cerebral function in learning: V. The retention of motor areas in primates. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1924;12:249–276.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Ellman SJ, Berman Al. Deafferentation in monkeys: effect on conditioned grasp response. Science. 1966;151:593–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Motor behavior following deafferentation in the developing and motorically mature monkey. In: Herman R, Grillner S, Ralston HJ, Stein PSG, Stuart D, eds. Neural Control of Locomotion. New York: Plenum; 1976:675–705.
   Google Scholar
• Azrin NH, Holz WC. Punishment. In: Honig WK, ed. Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966:380–447.
   Google Scholar
• Lassek AM. Inactivation of voluntary motor func-tion following rhizotomy. I Neuropath Exper Studies. 1953;2:83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Perrella PN, Barro G. Behavioral develop-ment following forelimb deafferentation on day of birth in monkeys with and without blinding. Science. 1973;181:959–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In: Exercise and Sports Science Reviews. Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates; 1977:335–374.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medi-cine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371–401.
   Google Scholar
• Page SJ. Learned nonuse and hemiakinesia: One in the same? Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Ince LP. Escape and avoidance conditioning of response in the plegic arm of stroke patients: a preliminary study. Psychonom Sci. 1969;16:49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam IL, Zeretsky HH, Brucker BB, Gutman A. Avoidance conditioning of motor responses in elderly brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1971;52:318–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf S, LeCraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exper Neurol. 1989;104:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JFI, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice. Stroke. 2000;31(4):986–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(5):406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor H, Elbert S, Knecht C, et al. Phantom limb pain as a perceptual correlate of massive cortical reorganization in upper limb amputees. Nature. 1995;375:482–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N, Knecht S, Hampson S, Larbig W, Taub E. Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after ner-vous system injury. Neuroreport. 1994;5(18):2593–2597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31(6):1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumburg S, Pierce S, Gaffney K, Gershkoff A. Constraint-induced therapy: moving research into practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; October 16,1999; Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of con-straint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann J, Hoskins T. Physical conditioning and altered self-concept in rehabilitated hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther. 1979;59:859–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan A, Dobrovolny L, Silver KH, Smith GV, Macko RF. Cardiovascular fitness after stroke: role of muscle mass and gait deficit severity. I Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;9: 185–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Practice, 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schallert T, Bland ST, Leasure IL. Motor rehabilita-tion, use-related neural events, and reorganization of the brain after injury. In: Levin H, Grafman J, eds. Conceptual Issues Relevant to Present and Future Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:145–167.
   Google Scholar
• Bach-y-Rita P. Conceptual issues relevant to current and future neurologic rehabilitation. In: Levin H, Grafman J, eds. Neuroplasticity and Reorganization of Function After Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. I Neurophysiol. 1998;79(2):1117–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Terborg C, Weiller C. Motor plasticity induced by synchronized thumb and foot move-ments. Exp Brain Res. 1999;125(4):435–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1997;28(4):722–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Rose DK. Recovery and arm use after stroke. I Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;10(4):197.
   Google Scholar
• Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. I Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48(8):314–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Freivogel S, Voss A. Exploring a repetitive training regime for upper limb hemiparesis in an inpatient setting: a report on three case studies. Brain Inj. 2002;16:1093–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce SR, Daly K, Gallagher KG, Gershkoff AM, Schaumburg SW. Constraint-induced therapy for a child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(10):1462–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation. I Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar