17
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reconceptualizing Poststroke Activity Level Using the Frenchay Activities Index

, , , &
Pages 82-91 | Published online: 23 Feb 2015

REFERENCES

  • Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y, et al. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabili-tation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(6): 513–518.
  • Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Prediction of re-habilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:133–143.
  • Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, McGuide JR, Diaz S. Impairment and disabili-ty: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(3):329–335.
  • Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Pedersen PM, Kammersgaard L, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Epidemiology of stroke-related disability: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15(4):785–799.
  • Bode, RK, Heinemann AW. Course of func-tional improvement following stroke, SCI and T131. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(1): 100–106.
  • Roth EJ, Heinemann AW. Comorbidities and complications in stroke: incidence, risk fac-tors and effects on outcomes. Rehabil R&D Rep. 1995;32:121.
  • Heinemann AW, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Granger CV. Functional status and therapeutic intensity during inpatient rehabilitation. Am] Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 74:315–325.
  • Roth EJ, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Diaz S. Incidence of and risk factors for medical complications during stroke reha-bilitation. Stroke. 2001;32(2):523–529.
  • Roth EL Lovell LL, Harvey RL, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Stroke rehabilitation: in-dwelling urinary catheters, enteral feeding tubes, and tracheostomies are associated with resource use and functional outcomes. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1845–1850.
  • Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke-a critical review of the literature. Age Aging. 1996;25(6):479–489.
  • Lin JH, Hasio SF, Chang CM, Huang MH, Liu CK, Lin YT. Factors influencing functional independence outcome in stroke patients after rehabilitation. Haihsiung I Med Sci. 2000;16(7):351–359.
  • Deutsch A, Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Russell CF. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in 1999. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81 (2):133–142.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980.
  • World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Impairments, Ac-tivities, and Participation. Beta-I Draft for Field Trials. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
  • DeHaan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Hewer RL, van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke. 1993;24:320–327.
  • Schuling J, deHaan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assess-ment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173–1177.
  • Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez JL, de Seijas EV. Quality of life among stroke survi-vors evaluated 1 year after stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2995.
  • Whiteneck G, Charlifu S, Gerhart, K, Overholser J, Richardson G. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term reha-bilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):519–526.
  • Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12:166–170.
  • Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Hewer RL. Social activities after stroke: measurement and nat-ural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Intl Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176–181.
  • Bond MJ, Harris RD, Smith DS, Clark MS. An examination of the factor structure of the Frenchay Activities Index. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14(1):27–29.
  • Piercy M, Carter, J, Mant J, Wade DT. Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in patients with stroke and their carers. Clin Rehabil 2000;14(4):433.
  • Brown M, Gordon WA, Haddad L. Models for predicting subjective quality of life in in-dividuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain In]. 2000;14(1):5–19.
  • Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research; 1960. (Expanded edition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980)
  • Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement. Chicago IL: MESA Press; 1982.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.