Motor Recovery Strategies After Stroke

REFERENCES

• Asanuma C. Mapping movements within a moving motor map. Trends Neurosci. 1991;14:217–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs KM, Donoghue JP. Reshaping the cortical motor map by unmasking latent intracortical con-nections. Science. 1991;251:944–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher CM. Concerning the mechanism of recovery in stroke hemiplegia. Can] Neurol Sci. 1992;19:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glees P. Functional reorganization following hemi-spherectomy in man and after small experimental lesions in primates. In: Bach-y-Rita P, ed. Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini U, Toni D, Pantano P, et al. Motor recovery after early brain damage. Stroke. 1994;25:514–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A function-al MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparet-ic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518–2527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement rep-resentations in primary motor cortex of adult squir-rel monkeys. Neurosci. 1996;16:785–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Hallett M. Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science. 1994; 263:1287–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of move-ment representations in primary motor cortex fol-lowing focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel mon-keys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:2144–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson BB. Functional outcome in rats trans-ferred to an enriched environment 15 days after focal brain ischemia. Stroke. 1996;27:324–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson AL, Johansson BB. The environment influ-ences functional outcome of cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke. 1995;26:644–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther. 1986;66:1233–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse SA, Jahnke MT, Bertelt CM, Schreiner C, Lucke D, Mauritz KH. Gait outcome in ambulatory hemiparetic patients after a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program and prognostic factors. Stroke. 1994;25:1999–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Densler P, Mauritz K. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the central-ly paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 1995;130:59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongbloed L, Stacey S, Brighton C. Stroke rehabilita-tion: sensorimotor integrative treatment versus func-tional treatment. Am] Occup Ther. 1989;43:391–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logigian MK, Samuels MA, Falconer JF. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:364–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord JP, Hall K. Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:88–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M. Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabili-tation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970;51:526–531.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trombly CA, Thayer-Nason L, Bliss G, Girard CA, Lyrist LA, Brexa-Hooson A. The effectiveness of therapy in improving finger extension in stroke patients. Am] Occup Ther. 1986;40:612–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PC, et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neurodevelopmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehab Med. 1990; 22:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2173–2180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Fowler RS Jr, et al. Stroke: Does rehabilitation affect outcome? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:375-382.
   Google Scholar
• Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangeman PT, Banaitis DA, Williams AK. Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: changes in functional performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:876–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JFI, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner RA, Kessler S. Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75: 114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, LeCraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriquez AA, Black PO, Kile KA, et al. Gait training efficacy using a home-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77: 801–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:38–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement thera-py. Am] Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reor-ganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31: 1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement thera-py during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impair-ment after stroke? Stroke. 2000;31:2984–2988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBow SB, Davies ML, Clarke HL, Coulborne F. Constraint-induced movement therapy and reha-bilitation exercises lessen motor deficits and vol-ume of brain injury after striatal hemorrhagic stroke in rats. Stroke. 2003;34:1021–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vander Lee JFI. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different? Curr Opinion Neurol. 2001;14:741-744.
   Google Scholar
• Sterr A, Freivogel S. Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemi-paresis. Neurology. 2003;61:842–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:870–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P, Hughes M. Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:286–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, et al. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascu lar stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:137–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Werner C, Uhlenbrock D, von Frankenberg S, Bardeleben A, Brandl-Hesse B. An electro-mechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in hemiparetic stroke patients: preliminary results. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2001;15:39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic ortho-sis. I Rehabil Res Develop. 2000;37(6):693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisen FL, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilita-tive training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:443–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000;54(10):1938–1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003;61:1604–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Vander Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training com-pared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:952–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1874–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, et al. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. I Neurosci. 2002;22(18):8297–8304.
   Google Scholar
• Jack D, Bojan R, Merians AS, et al. Virtual reality enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Systems Rehab Eng. 2001;9:308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Dettwiler A, Dyar T, Niermann G, Bizzi E. Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:192–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82:898–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak JJ, Hancock PA, Arthur EJ, Chrysler ST. Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics. 1993;36:777–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovely RG, Gregor RJ, Roy RR, et al. Effects of train-ing on the recovery of full weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat. Exp Neurol. 1986;92: 421–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin B, Fowler E, Gregor R. A strategy to train locomotion in patients with chronic hemiplegic stroke. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A, Malezic M, Mauritz KH. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemi-paretic patients by treadmill training with partial bodyweight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1087–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, et al. Treadmill train-ing with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26:976–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and tread-mill stimulation. Stroke. 1998;29:1122–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosak MC, Reding MJ. Comparison of partial body weight-supported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing assisted walking post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14:13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Carlsso J, Danielsson A, et al. Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walk-ing training on the ground. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15: 515–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemi-paretic stroke patients: a randomized controlled tri-al. Stroke. 2002;33:553–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:683–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Sarkodie-Gyan T. Gait pat-tern of several disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight sup-port. Clin Rehabil. 1999;12:401–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover trial. Stroke. 2002;33: 2895–2901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmajian JV, Kukulka CG, Narayan MG, Takebe K. Biofeedback treatment of foot-drop after stroke compared with standard rehabilitation technique: effects on voluntary control and strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mroczek N, Halpern D, McHugh R. Electro-myographic feedback and physical therapy for neuromuscular retraining in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978;59:258–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiavi RG, Champion SA, Freeman FR, Bugel HJ. Efficacy of myofeedback therapy in regaining con-trol of lower extremity musculature following stroke. Am I Phys Med. 1979;58:185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd WW, Pegram V, Nepomuceno C. Comparison of actual and simulated EMG biofeedback in the treatment of hemiplegic patients. Am I Phys Med. 1980;59:73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevo AJ, Visser SL, Vogelaar TW. Effect of EMG feedback on paretic muscles and abnormal cocon-traction in the hemiplegic arm, compared with conventional physical therapy. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1982;14:121–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basmajian JV, Gowland C, Brandstater ME, Swanson L, Trotter J. EMG feedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:613–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnside IG, Tobias S, Bursill D. Electromyographic feedback in the remobilization of stroke patients: a controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63: 217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Binder-Macleod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1393–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Binder-Macleod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1404–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis J, Donald MW, Monga TN, Sproule M, Young MJ. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:755–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John J. Failure of electrical myofeedback to aug-ment the effects of physiotherapy in stroke. Int Rehabil Res. 1986;9:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder T, Hulstijn W, Van der Meer J. EMG feed-back and the restoration of motor control. A con-trolled group study of 12 hemiparetic patients. Am I Phys Med. 1986;65:173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson MA, et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behav-ioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical thera-py programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68: 267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozean CD, Pease WS, Hubbell SI. Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilita-tion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:401–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow IL, Lincoln NB, Nouni FM, DeWeerdt W. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Studies. 1989;11:155–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandel AR, Nymark NJ, Balmer SJ, Grinnell DM, O'Riain MD. Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:649–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colborne GR, Olney SJ, Griffin MR Feedback of ankle joint angle and soleus electromyography in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1100–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intiso D, Santilli V, Grasso MG, Rossi R, Caruso I. Rehabilitation of walking with electromyographic biofeedback in footdrop after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1189–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley L, Hart BB, Mandan S, Flowers K, Riches M, Sanderson P. Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1998; 12:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleenbaker RE, Mainous AG. Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patient: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1301–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland J, Thomson MA. Efficacy of electromyo-graphic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 1994;74:534–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Phan H, Shah N. Biofeedback therapy in poststroke rehabil-itation: a meta-analysis of the randomized con-trolled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76: 508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg S, Fowler RS Jr. Kinesthetic biofeedback: a treatment modality for elbow range of motion in hemiplegia. Am] Occup Ther. 1980;34:738–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris ME, Matyas TA, Bach TM, Goldie PA. Electrogoniometric feedback: its effect on genu recurvatum in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73:1147–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourbonnais D, Bilodeau S, Lepage Y, Beaudoin N, Gravel D, Forget R. Effect of force-feedback treat-ments in patients with chronic motor deficits after a stroke. Am] Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;18:890–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulucci RA, Eckhouse RH. Retraining reaching in chronic stroke with real-time auditory feedback. Neurorehabilitation. 2001;16:171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merletti R, Zelaschi F, Latella D, Galli M, Angeli S, Sessa MB. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1978;10:147–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feed-back and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:492–502.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester P, Montgomery J, Bowman B, Hislop H. Effects of feedback stimulation training and cyclical electrical stimulation on knee extension in hemi-paretic patients. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1096–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73: 220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Hui-Chan CWY. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephelogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85: 131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akuthota P. The effects of functional electrical stim-ulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogataj U, Gros N, Kljajic M, Acimovic R, Malezic M. The rehabilitation of gait in patients with hemi-plegia: a comparison between conventional thera-py and multichannel functional electrical stimula-tion therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75:490–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand I Rehabil Med. 1997;29:3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke. 1998;29:975–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrostimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the ran-domized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:549–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kroon JR, van der Lee JFI, Ljzerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:350–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields RW. Electromyographically triggered electri-cal muscle stimulation for chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:407–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimula-tion for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:570–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Wilson DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and suba-cute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke: a comparison of rehabilitation settings. JAMA. 1997;277:396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indredavik B, Slordahl SA, Bakke F, Rokseth R, Haheim LL. Stroke unit treatment: long-term effects. Stroke. 1997;28:1861–1866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L, Eade J. Role of stroke rehabilitation units in managing severe disability after stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:2031–2034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaste M, Palomaki H, Sarna S. Where and how should elderly stroke patients be treated? A ran-domized trial. Stroke. 1995;26:249–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens RS, Ambler NR, Warren MD. A randomised controlled trial of a stroke rehabilitation ward. Age Ageing. 1984;13:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand T, Asplund K, Eriksson S, Hagg E, Lithner F, Wester PO. A non-intensive stroke unit reduced functional disability and the need for long-term hospitalisation. Stroke. 1985;16:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. BMJ. 1997;314:1151–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28:1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz RH, Allred KE, Backus ME, Hoffman JA. Functional changes during acute rehabilitation in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1685–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, Salonen JT, Riekkinen P. The significance of intensity of rehabil-itation of stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke. 1985; 16:928–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? Physiother Res Int. 1996;1: 75–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nugent JA, Schurr KA, Adams RD. A dose-response relationship between amount of weightbearing exercise and walking outcome following cere-brovascular accident. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:399–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DS, Goldenberg E, Ashburn A, et al. Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomized con-trolled trial. BMJ. 1981;282:517–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Bouchard JP, Brunet D. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:612–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, Tinson D, Hewer RL, Wade TD. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 1994;57:856–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. I Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 2002;72: 473–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a ran-domised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Lindgren I, Widner H, Wiklund I, Johansson BB. Can sensory stimulation improve the functional outcome in stroke patients? Neurology. 1993;43:2189–2192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson M, Johansson K, Johansson BB. Sensory stimulation promotes normalization of postural control after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1176–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeser MA, Alexander MP, Stiassny-Eder D, Galler V, Hobbs J, Bachman D. Real versus sham acupunc-ture in the treatment of paralysis in acute stroke patients: a CT scan lesion site study. I Neuro Rehabil. 1992;6: 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Sze FK, Wong E, Yi X, Woo J. Does acupuncture have additional value to standard poststroke motor rehabilitation? Stroke. 2002;33:186–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sze FK, Wong E, Or KK, Lau J, Woo J. Does acupuncture improve motor recovery after stroke? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2002;33:2604–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney DM, Gonzales A, Law W. Amphetamine, haloperidol and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science. 1982;217:855–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovda DA, Feeney DM. Amphetamine and experi-ence promote recovery of locomotor function after unilateral frontal cortex injury in the cat. Brain Res. 1984;298:358–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisostomo EA, Duncan PW, Propst M, Dawson DV, Davis IN. Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 1988;23:94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J, Toussaint L, Blackwell B. Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1047–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker-Batson D, Smith P, Curtis S, Unwin H, Greenlee R. Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence. Stroke. 1995;26:2254–2259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsson L, Wahlgren NG. Safety of dexamphet-amine in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized, double-blind, controlled dose-escalation study. Stroke. 2003;34:475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonde L, Nordstrom M, Nilsson CG, Lokk J, Viitanen M. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of amphetamine and physiotherapy after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;12(3):253–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospec-tive, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2001;358(9284):787–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam M, Tonin P, De Boni A, et al. Effects of fluoxe-tine and maprotiline on functional recovery in poststroke hemiplegic patients undergoing rehabil-itation therapy. Stroke. 1996;27:1211–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiraud-Chaumeil B, Pariente J, Albucher JF, Loubinoux I, Chollet F. Post-ischemia neurologic recovery. Bulletin de I Academie Nationale de Medecine. 2002;186(6):1015–1023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozlowski DA, James CD, Schallert T. Use-depend-ent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. I Neurosci. 1996;16: 4776–4786.
   Google Scholar
• Schallert T, Kozlowski DA, Humm JS, Cocke RR. Use-dependent structural events in recovery of function. Adv Neurol. 1997;73:229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, and the Sygen in Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Common drugs may influence motor recovery after stroke. Neurology. 1995;45:865–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones TA, Schallert T. Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. Neurosci. 1994;14:2140–2152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethel A, Kirsch JR, Koehler RC, Finklestein SP, Traystman RJ. Intravenous basic fibroblast growth factor decreased brain injury resulting from focal ischemia in cats. Stroke. 1997;28:609–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamata T, Dietrich WD, Schallert T, et al. Intracisternal basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) enhances functional recovery and upregulates the expression of a molecular marker of neuronal sprouting following focal cerebral infarction. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:8179–8184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Kim D, Nimes BT, et al. Transplants of fibrob-lasts genetically modified to express BDNF pro-mote regeneration of adult rat rubrospinal axons and recovery of forelimb function. I Neurosci. 1999;19(11):4370–4387.
   Google Scholar
• Clark WH, Schim JD, Kasner SE, et al. Trafermin in acute ischemic stroke: results of a phase II/111 ran-domized efficacy study [abstract]. Neurology. 2000;54:A88.
   Google Scholar
• Bogousslavsky J, Victor SJ, Salinas EO, et al. Fiblast (Trafermin) in acute ischemic stroke: results of the European-Australian phase II/111 safety and efficacy tri-al [abstract]. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000:10\(suppl. 2):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawamata T, Speliotes EK, Finklestein SR The role of polypeptide growth factors in recovery from stroke. Adv Neurol. 1997;73:377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage FH. Mammalian neural stem cells. Science. 2000;287:1433–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veizovic T, Beech JS, Stroemer RP, Watson WP, Hodges H. Resolution of stroke deficits following contralateral grafts of conditionally immortal neu-roepithelial stem cells. Stroke. 2001;32:1012–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner PJ, Gage FH. Regeneration in the adult and aging brain. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1717–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar