Family Presence at Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Considerations in a Rehabilitation Hospital

REFERENCES

• Tucker TL. Family presence during resuscitation. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2002;14 (2):177–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson C, Strawser D. Family presence during car-diopulmonary resuscitation: Foote Hospital's nine-year perspective. J Emerg Nurs. 1992;18(2):104–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) website. Accessed March 8, 2004. Available at: http://www.acep.org/1,2082,0.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner KL, Hwang CS, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Outcomes of cardiopulmonary arrest in an acute rehabilitation setting. Am 1 Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(2):92–99.
   Google Scholar
• American Heart Association (AHA). Part 2: Ethical aspects of CPR and ECC [Guidelines for Cardiopul-monary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascu-lar Care: International Consensus on Science]. Circu-lation. 2000;102(8): Supplement, 1–12–1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emergency Nurses' Association. Family presence at the bedside during invasive procedures and resuscitation [position statement]. Elk Grove, IL: ENA; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Helmer SD, Smith RS, Dort 1M, Shapiro WM, Katan BS. Family presence during trauma resuscitation: a survey of AAST and ENA members. 1 Trauma: lnj Infect Crit Care. 2000;48(6):1015–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason D. Family presence: evidence versus tradi-tion. Am 1 Crit Care. 2003;12(3):190–192.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Death of a child in the emergency department, a joint statement by the American Academy of Pediat-rics and the American College of Emergency Physi-cians [pediatrics: policy statement]. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(4):409–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark AP, Calvin AO, Meyers TA, Eichhorn DJ, Guzzetta CE. Family presence during cardiopulmo-nary resuscitation and invasive procedures: a re-search based intervention. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001;13(4):569–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams 1M. Family presence during resuscitation: To see or not to see? Nurs Clin North Am. 2002;37(1):211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Martin J. Rethinking traditional thoughts. 1 Emerg Nurs. 1991;17(2):67–68.
   Google Scholar
• Zottoli EK. Neonatal resuscitation: making the case for family presence. AWOHNN Lifelines. 1998;37(1): 70–72.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreaux ED, Francis JL, Loyacano T. Family pres-ence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in the emergency department: a critical review and suggestions for future research. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(2):193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckle N, MacLean SL. Assessment of family-centered care policies and practices in nine US emergency departments. 1 Emerg Nurs.2001;27(3):238–245.
   Google Scholar
• Footlick I. The family: Basic unit for the developing person. In: Murray RB, Zentner JP. Health Promotions Strategies Throughout the Lifespan. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001:157–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson SMH. Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice, and Research, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Emergency Nurses' Association (ENA) Position Statements: family presence at the bedside during invasive procedures and/or resuscitation. 1 Emerg Nurs. 1995;21(2):26A.
   Google Scholar
• Slade A, Tennant A, Chamberlain MA. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy upon length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting. 1 Rehabil Med. 2002;34: 260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty PW, Neri MT, Bell K, DeJong G. Use of out-comes information in acute rehabilitation. Am 1 Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(6):468–478.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeman SP. Rehabilitation Nursing: Process, Applica-tion, and Outcomes, 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG. Defining the population, treatments, and outcomes of interest: reconciling the rules of biology with meaningfulness. Am 1 Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(2):147–159.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean SL, Guzzetta CE, White C, Fontaine D, Eichhorn DJ, Meyers TA, Desy P. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: practices of critical care and emergency nurses. Am] Grit Care. 2003;12(3):246–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorn DJ, Meyers TA, Guzzetta CE, Clark AP, Klein JD, Taliaferro E, Calvin AO. Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation: hear-ing the voice of the patient. Am 1 Nurs. 2001; 101 (5) :48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bassler PC. The impact of education on nurses' be-liefs regarding family presence in a resuscitation room. 1 Nurses Staff Develop. 1999;15(3):126–131.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetta CE, Mitchell TG. Response to "High touch in high tech: The presence of relatives and friends during resuscitative efforts." Scholarly Inquiry Nurs Pract. 1997;11(2):169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Hott C. Caring for the survivors [change of shift]. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39 (5) 570–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver IC. Family presence research strikes a chord. Am] Nurs. 2000; 100(5):12.
   Google Scholar
• Pitorak EF. Care at the time of death: how nurses can make the last hours of a life a richer, more comfort-able experience. Am] Nurs. 2003;103(7):42–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eppich WI, Arnold LD. Family member presence in the pediatric emergency department. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2003;15(3):294–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospital changes policy to allow benefit of family presence during invasive procedures and resuscita-tion. Report Med Guidelines Res. 2000;11(8):1–2,5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenczweig C. Should relatives witness resuscita-tion? Ethical issues and practical considerations. Can Med Assoc' 1998;158(5):617–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar