Outcomes in Two Post-Acute Non-Inpatient Rehabilitation Settings

REFERENCES

• CARF. Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilita-tion Facilities (CARF) Quality Forum White Paper. 1996. Available at: http://www.carf.org/Publica-tions/Online/WhitePaper.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A. Tread-mill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–01744.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Bagnall A. Spinal injuries centres (SICs) for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Cochrane Data-base of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession num- ber: 00075320–100000000–03504.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B. Multidisciplinary re-habilitation for fibromyalgia and musculoskeletal pain in working age adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–01349.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database of System-atic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–03188.
   Google Scholar
• Forster A, Young J, Langhorne P. Medical day hospi-tal care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–00486.
   Google Scholar
• Hillsdon M, Foster C, Thorogood M. Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–02189.
   Google Scholar
• Mottram P, Pitkala K, Lees C. Institutional versus at-home long term care for functionally dependent older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–02477.
   Google Scholar
• Shepperd S, Lliffe S. Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. Cochrane Database of System-atic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–00713.
   Google Scholar
• Ram FSF, Wedzicha JA, Wright J, Greenstone M. Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–02626.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth NL, Chad KE, Harrison EL, Reeder BA, Marshall SC. Home versus center based physical activity programs in older adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–02983.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron ID, Handoll HHG, Finnegan TP, Madhok R, Langhorne P. Coordinated multidisciplinary ap-proaches for inpatient rehabilitation of older pa-tients with proximal femoral fractures. Cochrane Da-tabase of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–00992.
   Google Scholar
• Ward D, Severs M, Dean T, Brooks N. Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320–100000000–02226.
   Google Scholar
• Gill HS. The changing nature of ambulatory rehabili-tation programs and services in a managed care environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995:76(12-S):SC10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison M. On the threshold of outcome manage-ment. Rehab Manage. 1997. As cited on: http://www.carf.org/Publications/Online/WhitePaper.
   Google Scholar
• AHCPR. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Re-ferral and Patient Management. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Granger CV. Functional status and therapeutic intensity during inpatient rehabilitation. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Mallinson T. Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy char-acteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:2537–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagle DJ, Guyatt GH, Patterson C, Turpie I, Sackett B, Singer J. Effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital. Can Med Associates]. 1991;144:699–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladman J, Whynes D, Lincoln N. Cost comparison of domiciliary and hospital-based stroke rehabilita-tion. Age Ageing. 1994;23(3):241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui E, Lum CM, Woo J, Or KH, Kay RL. Outcomes of elderly stroke patients: day hospital versus conven-tional medical management. Stroke. 1995;26(9): 1616–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;46:660–662.
   Google Scholar
• Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Kimura A. Stroke impairment assessment set: a new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Ipn I Rehabil Med. 1994;31:119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. I Psychiatric Res. 1975;12: 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilita-tion Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore MD: Brooks; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Heinemann AW, Granger CV, Linn RT. Functional gains and therapy intensities during sub-acute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1514–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Mallinson T. Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the "black box" of inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1901–1908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Aging. 1983;12:166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuling J, deHaan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Hewer RL. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int I Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chong DK-H. Measurement of Instrumental Activi-ties of Daily Living in stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:1119–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Abresch RT, Carter GT. The reliability and validity of a self-report version of the FIM instru-ment in persons with neuromuscular disease and chronic pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(1):116–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwan J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Sci Med. 1981;15:221–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim S, Barer D, Noun i F. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. 1 Epidemiol Community Health. 1986;30:166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evalu-ation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression Scale). Am] Prey Med. 1994;10:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuifbergen A, Seraphine A, Roberts G. An explana-tory model of health promotion and quality of life in chronic illness. Nurs Res. 2000;49(3):122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale.] Pers Assess. 1985;49:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further examination of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evi-dence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. / Pers Assess. 1991;57:149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre IM. WINSTEPS: Rasch Computer Program. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS. Statistical Program for the Social Sciences, ver-sion 13.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgore K. Measuring outcomes in the postacute continuum. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(12-S):5C21–26.
   Google Scholar