Motor Learning and the Use of Videotape Feedback After Stroke

REFERENCES

• Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning, 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Sabari JS. Motor learning concepts applied to activ-ity-based intervention with adults with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majsak Mi. Application of motor learning principles to the stroke population. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1996; 3:27–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt RA. Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sage GH. Motor Learning and Control: A Neuropsy-chological Approach. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell IC, Traub MM, Day BL, et al. Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain. 1982; 105:515–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper LK, Rothstein AL. Videotape replay and the learning of skills in open and closed environments. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1981;52:91–199.
   Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepheard RB. A motor learning model for rehabilitation. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, Held AM, eds. Movement Science:Foundations for Physical Therapy Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: As-pen; 1987:31–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: Action, movement and neuromotor processes. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, Gentile AM, Held JM, eds. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabili-tation. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 1987:93–154.
   Google Scholar
• Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L. Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Motor Behav. 1983;18:353–372.
   Google Scholar
• Darden GF. Videotape feedback for student learning and performance: a learning-stages approach. J Phys Education Recreation Dance. 1999;70:40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien, DJ. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest. 1994;46:328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jambor E, Weekes E. Video-tape feedback: make it effective. J Phys Education Recreation Dance. 1995; 66:48–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hall EG, Erffmeyer, ES. The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal with videotape modeling on free throw accuracy of intercollegiate female basketball players. J Sport Psychol. 1983;5:343–346.
   Google Scholar
• Gray SW. Effect of visuomotor rehearsal with video-taped modeling on racquetball performance of be-ginning players. Percept Motor Skills. 1990;70:379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poretta DL, Surburg PR, Gillespie, MG. Use of vari-ous instructional methods for enhancing gross mo-tor skill acquisition in students with moderate men-tal retardation. Clin Kinesiology. 1999;53:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach J, Mulder T. Neuropsychology and the relearning of motor skills following stroke. Intl J Rehabil Res. 1999;22:11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton PL. Teaching interpersonal skills with videotape. Occup Ther Ment Health. 1982;2:17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Re-search: Applications to Practice, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Masden JC. The localization of lesions affecting the cerebral hemispheres. In: Brazis PW, Masden JC, Biller J, eds. Localization of Clinical Neurology. Boston: Little, Brown & Co; 1985:301–359.
   Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Wu C-Y. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:333–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony J, LeResche L, Niaz U, et al. Limits of the "Mini-Mental State" as a screening test for demen-tia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychol Med. 1982;12:397–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Resi-dency. 1975;12:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein RW, Bell BJ. Self-care skills: behavioral manage-ment with Klein-Bell ADL Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:335–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Letts L. A critical review of scales of daily living. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43:522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, et al. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67: 22–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: results of pilot testing. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61:191–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poole JL. Application of motor learning principles in occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:531–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SC, et al. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through video-tape replay and a self-controlled learning environ-ment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;68:269–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallister SG, Napper-Owen G. Observation and analysis of skills of student teachers in physical edu-cation. Phys Educator. 1999;56:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Conceptual Foundations for Occupa-tional Therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson JM, Trombly CA. The effect of added-purpose and meaningful occupation on motor learning. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51:508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50:177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar