508
Views
74
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gait Training Strategies Utilized in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Are We Really Making a Difference?

&
Pages 1-8 | Published online: 30 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Gresham G, Duncan P, Stason W. Post Stroke Guide-lines Technical Report. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1995.
  • Pearson T, Blair S, Daniels S, et al. AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: Consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. American Heart Association science advi-sory and coordinating committee. Circulation. 2002;16:388–391.
  • Mayo N. Epidemiology and recovery. Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;7:1–25.
  • Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley J, Mulroy S. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995;26:982–989.
  • Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Olsen T. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:27–32.
  • Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H., Vive-Larsen J., Stoier M, Olsen T. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke, part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406–412.
  • Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H., Vive-Larsen J., Stoier M, Olsen T. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke, part I: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:399–405.
  • Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S. Disable-ment following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:258–268.
  • Lerner-Frankiel M, Vargas S, Brown M, Krusell L, Schoneberger W. Functional community ambulation: What are your criteria? Clin Manage Phys Ther. 1986;6: 12–15.
  • Keenan M, Haider T, Stone L. Dynamic electromyo-graphy to assess elbow spasticity. J Hand Surg. 1990;15A:607–614.
  • Forster A, Young J. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. Br Med J. 1995;311:83–86.
  • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt G. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically im-portant difference. Controlled Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.
  • Cella D, Eton D, Fairclough D, Bonomi P, Heyes A, Silberman C, Wolf M, Johnson D. What is a clinically meaningful change on the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (fact-I) questionnaire?: Results from eastern cooperative oncology group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:285–295.
  • Barak S, Duncan P. Issues in selecting outcome mea-sures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3:505–524.
  • Wade D. Evaluating outcome in stroke rehabilitation (quality control and clinical audit). Scand J Rehabil Med. 1992;26:S97–S104.
  • Harada N, Chiu V, Stewart A. Mobility-related func-tion in older adults: assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:837–841.
  • Perera S, Mody S, Woodman R, Studenski S. Mean-ingful change and responsiveness in common physi-cal performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:743–749.
  • Duncan P, Bode R, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
  • Moseley A, Stark A, Cameron I, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2005;19:CD002840.
  • Bobath B. Treatment of adult hemiplegia. Physio-therapy. 1977;63:310–313.
  • arrWmmer B, Stanghelle J. Bobath or motor re-learning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:361–369.
  • Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia. A Neurophysiological Approach. New York: Harper and Row; 1970.
  • Wagennar R, Meijer O, Wieringen PV, et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990; 22:1–8.
  • Voss D. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1967;46:S38–S98.
  • Taylor P, Burridge J, Dunkerley A, Wood D, Norton J, Singleton C, Swain I. Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80: 1577–1583.
  • Daly J, Roenigk K, Holcomb J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of functional neuromuscular stimula-tion in chronic stroke subjects. Stroke. 2006;37:172–178.
  • Daly J, Roenigk K, Butler K, Gansen J, Fredrickson E, Marsolais E, Rogers J, Ruff R. Response of sagittal plane gait kinematics to weight-supported treadmill training and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. /Rehabil Res Develop. 2004;41: 807–820.
  • Kido-Thompson A, Stein R. Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked po-tentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles. La Brain Res. 2004;159:491–500.
  • Baratta R, Solomonow M. The dynamic perfor-mance model of skeletal muscle. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1992;19:419–454.
  • Finch L, Barbeau H, Arsenault B. Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: develop-ment of a gait retraining strategy. Phys Ther. 1991;71:842–855.
  • Edgerton V, Tillakaratne N, Bigbee A, deLeon R, Roy R. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:145–167.
  • Dobkin B. The economic impact of stroke. Neurol-ogy. 1995;45:S6–S9.
  • Behrman A, Harkema S. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000;80:688–700.
  • Wernig A, Muller S, Nanassy A, Cagol E. Laufband therapy based on "rules of spinal locomotion" is effective in spinal cord injured persons. Eur J Neurosci. 1995;7:823–829.
  • Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-sup-ported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66:484–493.
  • Dobkin B, Barbeau H, Deforge D, et al. The evolu-tion of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spi-nal cord injury: the multi-center randomized spinal cord injury locomotor trial. Neurorehabil Neural Re-pair. 2007;21:25–35.
  • Dobkin B, Harkema S, Requejo P, Edgerton V. Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in sub-jects with complete and incomplete spinal cord in-jury.J Neurol Rehabil. 1995;9:183–190.
  • Hesse S. Locomotor therapy in neurorehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16:133–139.
  • Laufer Y, Dickstein R, Chefez Y, Marcovitz E. The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: A randomized study. J Rehabil Res Develop. 2001; 38:69–78.
  • Hesse S, Jahnke M, Schaffrin A, Lucke D, Reiter F, Konrad M. Immediate effects of therapeutic facilita-tion on the gait of hemiparetic patients as com-pared with walking with and without a cane. Electroencephalography Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;109:515–522.
  • Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M, Schaffrin A, Baake P, Malezic M, Mauriz K. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26:976–981.
  • Hesse S, Malezic M, Schaffrin A, Mauritz K. Restora-tion of gait by combined treadmill training and multi-channel electrical stimulation in non-ambula-tory hemiparetic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:133–145.
  • Hesse S, Jahnke M, Bertelt C, Schreiner C, Lucke D., Mauritz K-H. Gait outcome in ambulatory hemiparetic patients after a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program and prognostic factors. Stroke. 1994;25:1999–2004.
  • Grillner S. Interaction between central and periph-eral mechanisms in the control of lomotion. Progress Brain Res. 1979;50:227–235.
  • Grillner S, Zangger P. On the central generation of locomotion in the low spinal cat. Exp Brain Res. 1979;34:241–261.
  • Edgerton V, Roy R, deLeon R, Tilakaratne N, Hodgson J. Does motor learning occur at the spinal cord? NeuroScientist. 1997;3:287–294.
  • Sullivan K, Knowlton B, Dobkin B. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on post-stroke locomotor recov-ery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:683–691.
  • Forrester L, Hanley D, Macko R. Effects of treadmill exercise on transcranial magnetic stimulation-in-duced excitability to quadriceps after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:229–234.
  • Macko R, DeSouza C, Tretter L, et al. Treadmill aero-bic exercise training reduces the energy expenditure and cardiovascular demands of hemiparetic gait in chronic stroke patients. Stroke. 1997;28:326–330.
  • Macko R, Katzel L, Yataco A, Tretter L, DeSouza C, Dengel D, Smith G, Silver K. Low-velocity graded treadmill stress testing in hemiparetic stroke pa-tients. Stroke. 1997;28:988–992.
  • Macko R, Smith G, Dobrovolny C, Sorkin J, Goldberg A, Silver K. Treadmill training improves fitness reserve in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:879–884.
  • Malouin F, Potvin M, Prevost J, Richards C, Wood-Dauphinee S. Use of an intensive task-oriented gait training program in a series of patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents. Phys Ther. 1992;72:781–793.
  • Waters R, Mulroy S. The energy expenditure of nor-mal and pathological gait. A review. Gait Posture. 1999;9:207–231.
  • Ada L, Dean C, Hal J, Bampton J, Crompton S. A treadmill and over-ground walking program im-proves walking in persons residing in the commu-nity after stroke: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1486–1491.
  • Plummer P, Behrman A, Duncan P, et al. Effects of stroke severity and training duration on locomotor recovery after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:137–151.
  • Kosak M, Reding M. Comparison of partial body weight-supported treadmill gait training versus ag-gressive bracing assisted walking post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14:13–19.
  • Edgerton V, Leon R, Harkema S, et al. Retraining the injured spinal cord. J Physiol. 2001;533:15–22.
  • Yagura H, Hatakenaka M, Miyai I. Does therapeutic facilitation add to locomotor outcome of body weight-supported treadmill training in nonam-bulatory patients with stroke? A randomized con-trolled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87: 529–535.
  • Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38:349–354.
  • Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Stroke. 2002;33:2895–2901.
  • Tong R, Ng M, Li L. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1298–1304.
  • Peurala S, Tarkka I, Pitkanen K, Sivenius J. The effec-tiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1557–1564.
  • Israel J, Campbell D, Kahn J, Hornby T. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic-and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individu-als with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006;11:1466–1478.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.