Virtual Reality-Based Approaches to Enable Walking for People Poststroke

REFERENCES

• O'Sullivan S, Schmitz T. Physical Rehabilitation As-sessment and Treatment, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Jette D, Latham N, Smout R, Gassaway J, Slavin M, Horn S. Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatients rehabilitation facilities. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbeau H, Visintin M. Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1458–1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer P, Behrman A, Duncan P, et al. Effects of stroke severity and training duration on locomotor recovery after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21 (21 ):137–151 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Sarkodie-Gyan T. Gait pat-tern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(5):401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual real-ity: review. J NeuroEna Rehabil. 2004;1:10–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryanton C, Bosse J, Brien M, McLean J, McCormick A, Sveistrup H. Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conven-tional home exercise in children with cerebral palsy. CyberPsychol Behav. 2006;6(2):123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie J, McDonough S, Lennon S, McNeill M. Development of a virtual reality system for the reha-bilitation of the upper limb after stroke. Stud Health Tech Inform. 2005;117:218–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crosbie JH, Lennon S, McNeill MDJ, McDonough SM. Virtual reality as a training device for movement rehabilitation in the upper limb after chronic stroke: two case studies. Phys Ther Rev. 2006;11(3):223.
   Google Scholar
• Kuttuva M, Boian R, Merians A, et al. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9(2):148–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual real-ity and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1247–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, et al. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: func-tional exercises with quantitative feedback in a grav-ity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006;14(3):378–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, Bizzi E. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. Neurol Rep. 1999;23(2):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):898–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, Battistin L, Dam M. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Informatics Internet Med. 2004;29(2):119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(2):52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe DL, Brown DA, Pierson-Carey C, Buckley E, Lew HL. Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(3A):283–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You SH, Jang SH, Kim Y-H, et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated loco-motor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study [erratum appears in Stroke. 2005;36(7):1625]. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Adamovich S, Poizner H, Burdea GC. Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Restorative Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):371–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch JE, Paserchia C, Vecchione C, Lewis JA, Boian R, Burdea G. Improved gait and elevation speed of individuals post-stroke after lower extrem-ity training in virtual environments. J Neurologic Phys Ther. 2004;28(4):185–186.
   Google Scholar
• Rung J, Richards CL, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A. A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9(2):157–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim J, Kim K, Kim DY, et al. Virtual environment training system for rehabilitation of stroke patients with unilateral neglect: crossing the virtual street. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10(1):7–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz N, Ring H, Naveh Y, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Weiss PL. Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke pa-tients with unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(2):1235–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilita-tion: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(3):187–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burdea GC. Virtual rehabilitation-benefits and chal-lenges. Methods Information Med. 2003;42(5):519–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Li H, Lee MW. Human body posture infer-ence from immersive interaction. Paper presented at: ACM International Workshop on lmmersive Telepresence at ACM Multimedia; 2002; Les Pins, France.
   Google Scholar
• Girone M, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Popescu V, Deutsch JE. A Stewart platform-based system for ankle telerehabilitation. Autonomous Robots. 2001;10(2): 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boian R, Deutsch JE, Lee CS, Burdea G, Lewis JA. Haptic effects for virtual reality-based post-stroke rehabilitation. Paper presented at: Symposium on Haptic Interfaces For Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; 2003; Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch JE, Latonio J, Burdea G, Boian R. Post-stroke rehabilitation with the Rutgers ankle system - a case study. Presence. 2001(10):416–430.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch JE. Rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries using the Rutgers Ankle Haptic Interface: three case reports. Eurohaptics. 2001:11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mirelman A, Deutsch JE, Bonato P. Greater effect of lower extremity training with robotics and virtual reality for transfer to overground walking speed than robotics training alone: preliminary findings. Paper presented at: International Workshop on Vir-tual Reality; 2006; New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schultheis MT, Rizzo AA. The application of virtual reality technology for rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46:296–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JWR, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2529–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic ortho-sis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Werner C, Bardeleben A. A mechanized gait trainer for restoring gait in nonambulatory subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(9):1158–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R. Development of a robotic walking simulator for gait reha-bilitation. Biomed Technol (Berlin). 2003;48(10): 281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollman JH, Brey RH, Robb RA, Bang TJ, Kaufman KR. Spatiotemporal gait deviations in a virtual reality environment. Gait Posture. 2006;23(4):441–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar