Cortical Brain Stimulation: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for Upper Limb Motor Recovery Following Stroke

REFERENCES

• Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome follow-ing initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. Stroke. 1988;19(11):1354–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Preyo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris DM. Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorgani-zation following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;14(1 suppl):S77-91, ix.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of con-straint-induced movement therapy for upper ex-tremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients re-sults from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb B. Overview of cortical plasticity and recovery from brain injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2003;14(1 suppl):S7–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75(5):2144–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey RL. Motor recovery after stroke: new direc-tions in scientific inquiry. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003; 14(1S):S1–S5.
   Google Scholar
• Hebb DO. The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss TVP, Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of syn-aptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaes-thetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol. 1973;232:331–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss TVP, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocam-pus. Nature. 1993;361:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir ZI, Massey PV. Long-term potentiation and long-term depression. In: Selxer M, Clarke S, Cohen L, Duncan P, Gage F, eds. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation: Neural Repair and Plasticity, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:60–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mauk MD, Garcia KS, Medina JF. Does cerebellar LTD mediate motor learning? Toward a resolutin without a smoking gun. Neuron. 1998;20:359–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess G. Synaptic plasticity of local connections in rat motor cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2003;63:271–276.
   Google Scholar
• Hess G, Donoghue JP. Long-term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to re-organize cortical motor maps. J Neurophysiol. 1994; 71:2543–2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess G. Calcium-induced long-term potentiation in horizontal connections of rat motor cortex. Brain Res. 2002;952:142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess G, Jacobs KM, Donoghue JP. N-methyl-D-aspar-tate receptor mediated component of field potentials evoked in horizontal pathways of rat motor cortex. Neuroscience. 1994;61(2):225–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch CM, Davis BC, Wise SP, et al. Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cor-tex. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:3661–3665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Repetitive microstimulation alters the cortical representation of movements in adult rats. Somatosens Motor Res. 1990;7:463–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs KM, Donoghue JP. Reshaping the cortical mo-tor map by unmasking latent intracortical connec-tions. Science. 1991;251:944–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monofils MH, VandenBerg PM, Kleim JA, Teskey GC. Long term potentiation induces expanded move-ment representations and dendritic hypertrophy in layer V of rat sensorimotor neocortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2004;14:586–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins GW, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representa-tions in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel mon-keys. J Neurosci. 1996;16(2):785–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC. Arm function after stroke: neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1641–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Rothwell JC, et al. Facilita-tion of muscle evoked responses after repetitive corti-cal stimulation in man. 1998;122:79-84.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wasserman EM, Hallet M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1994;117:847–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Sommer M, Tergau F, Paulus W. Lasting influ-ence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2000;287:37–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangitano M, Valero-Cabre A, Tormos JM, Mottaghy FM, Romero JR, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of in-put-output curves by low and high frequency repeti-tive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:1249–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM. Interindividual vari-ability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitabilty. Exp Brain Res. 2000;133:425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:800–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peinemann A, Reimer B, Loer C, et al. Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115:1519–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997; 48:1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meullbacher W, Zeimann U, Baroojerdi B, Hallet M. Effects of low frequency transcranial magnetic stimu-lation on motor excitability and basic motor behav-ior. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1002–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touge T, Gerschlager W, Brown P, Rothwell JC. Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:2138–2145.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarization induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:600–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability eleva-tions induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimu-lation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Castro LO, Savagim EA, et al. Enhance-ment of non-dominant hand motor function by an-odal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2006;404:232–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, et al. Modulat-ing parameters of excitability during and after transcortical direct stimulation of the human cortex. J Physiol. 2005;568:291–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, Murase N, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Transcallosal inhibition in chronic sub-cortical stroke. Neuroimage. 2005;28(4):940–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influ-ence of interhemispheric interactions on motor func-tion in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC. Functional imaging in stroke recovery. Stroke. 2004;35\(suppl 1):2695–2698.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, et al. Direct dem-onstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the hu-man motor cortex produced by transcranial mag-netic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1999;124:520–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G. Contalateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct cur-rent stimulation. NeuroReport. 2006;17:671–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang N, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcollosal excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2004;156: 439–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganiza-tion of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3321–3325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learning Memory. 2000;74:27–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM. Cortical map reorgani-zation enabled by nucleus basalis acitivity. Science. 1998;279:1714–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Alamancos MA, Borrell J. Functional recovery of forelimb response capacity after forelimb primary motor cortex damage in the rat is due to the reorga-nization of adjacent areas of cortex. Neuroscience. 1995;68:793–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000;123:572–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan K, Kunesch E, Benecke R, Cohen LG, Classen J. Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cor-tex excitability induced by interventional paired asso-ciative stimulation. J Physiol. 2002;543:699–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch CM, Khurana V, Kopylev L, Cohen L. En-hancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:2110–2116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excit-ability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1471–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Thera-peutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimu-lation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;65:466–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, lkoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2681–2686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimu-lation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemi-sphere in stroke patients. Neurology. 2005;64:1802–1804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, et al. A sham-con-trolled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37:2115–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins-Muir DL, Jones TA. Cortical electrical stimula-tion combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003;25:780–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Bruneau R, VandenBerg P, MacDonald R, Mulrooney R, Pocock D. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces pen-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurol Res. 2003;25:789–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teskey GC, Flynn C, Goertzen CD, Monofils MH, Young NA. Cortical stimulation improves skilled fore-limb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res. 2003;25:794–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost S, et al. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: a feasi-bility study in primates. Neurol Res. 2003;25:801–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Lai SM, Keighley J. Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Larson D, Plautz EJ, Friel KM, Barbay S, Frost SB. A squirrel monkey model of poststroke motor recovery. ILAR J. 2003;44:161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama Y, Fukaya C, Yamamoto T. Poststroke pain control by chronic motor cortex stimulation: neuro-logical characteristics predicting a favorable re-sponse. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:585–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto T. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for central deafferentation pain: experience with bulbar pain secondary to Wallenberg syndrome. Sterotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;62:295–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Treatment of thalamic pain by chronic motor cortex stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14:131–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation in pa-tients with thalamic pain. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:393–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:464–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy R, Ruiand S, Weinand M, Lowry D, Dafer R. Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of pateints with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy. J Neurosurgery. In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar