Cortical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: A Small Phase II Pilot Study of a Fully Implanted Stimulator

REFERENCES

• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid up-per limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen IS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75(4):394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein J. Motor recovery strategies after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11 (2):12–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. Neurophysiol. 1996;75(5):2144–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganiza-tion of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80(6):3321–3325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;74(1):27–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles G. Cortical reorganization-effects of inten-sive therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ. Intensity versus task-specificity after stroke: how important is intensity? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(9):730–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lan-cet Neurol. 2004;3(9):528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepert J, Hamzei F, WeiIler C. Lesion-induced and training-induced brain reorganization. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler Al. Re-petitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist. 2002;8(6):325–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095–2104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wassermann EM, Hal-lett M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial mag-netic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 4):847–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangitano M, Valero-Cabre A, Tormos JM, Mot-taghy FM, Romero JR, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of input-output curves by low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(8):1249–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Interindividual variability of the modula-tory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2000;133(4):425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(5):800–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peinemann A, Reimer B, Loer C, et al. Long-last-ing increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(7):1519–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgard MP, Merzenich MM. Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis acitivity. Science. 1998;279:1714–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Bruneau R, VandenBerg P, MacDonald E, Mulrooney R, Pocock D. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces pen-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):789–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins-Muir DL, Jones TA. Cortical electrical stimu-lation combined with rehabilitative training: en-hanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):780–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: a feasibility study in primates. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):801–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teskey GC, Flynn C, Goertzen CD, Monfils MH, Young NA. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):794–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M, Cramer SC. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3):464–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer S, Benson, R, Nimes, D, Burra VC, Janosky JS, Weinand ME, et al. Use of functional MRI to guide decisions in a clinical stroke trial. Stroke. 2005:36(5): e50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, et al. The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):615–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measure-ments of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical exami-nation scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embret-son S., Laster U.. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromwell F. Occupational Therapist Manual for Basic Skills Assessment: Primary Prevocational Evaluation. Pasadena, CA: Fair Oaks Printing; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996;67(3):588–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual-Leone A, Tarazona F, Keenan J, Tormos JM, Hamilton R, Catala MD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroplasticity. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(2):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JA, Lutsep H, Cramer SC, Weinand M. Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery af-ter stroke: case report. Neurol Res. 2003;25(8):815–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plastic-ity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(8):1000–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monfils MH, VandenBerg PM, Kleim JA, Teskey GC. Long-term potentiation induces expanded move-ment representations and dendritic hypertrophy in layer V of rat sensorimotor neocortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(5):586–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;65(3):466–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, et al. Repetitive transcra-nial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1471–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel F, Ce-Firr, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. March 2005;(pt 3):490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Tran-scranial direct current stimulation of the unaf-fected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2005;16(14):1551–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial mag-netic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37(8):2115–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaf-fected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1802–1804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, lkoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2681–2686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar