REFERENCES
- Office of Technology Assessment, Senate Commit-tee on Labor and Human Resources. Technology and Handicapped People. Washington, DC: US Govern-ment Printing Office; 1982.
- Institute of Medicine (IOM), Committee on Assess-ing Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Division of Health Sciences Policy. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
- Welch P, Palames C. A brief history of disabled rights legislation in the United States. In: Welch P, ed. Strategies for Teaching Universal Design. Boston: Adaptive Environments Center; 1995.
- Laurie G. Centers for independent living. J Curr Social Issues. 1979;16(1).
- Independent Living Research Utilization Project. Directory of Independent Living Programs. Houston: Author; 1985.
- The Center for Universal Design. The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 1997.
- New Freedom Initiative. Submitted to Congress Feb-ruary 1, 2001. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/freedominitiative/freedominitiative.html
- National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Building Participatory Action Research Partnerships in Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 1997.
- Spaepen AJ. Technology transfer and service deliv-ery in rehabilitation technology. J Rehabil Sci. 1991; (4):84–87.
- Peters JP. Preface to Marketing Management. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2002.
- Bureau of Industry and Security. Technology Assess-ment of the U.S. Assistive Technology Industry. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce; 2003.
- Bauer S, Lane J. The demand-pull project on wheeled mobility. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2000 Annual Conference. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press; 2000.