Using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT) to Measure Outcomes for Clients Following Stroke

REFERENCES

• Johnston MV, Keith RA, Hinderer SR. Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical reha-bilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:S3—S23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Ottawa Panel. Ottawa Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for post-stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13:1–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Horner RD, Duncan PW, Clipp E, Hamilton B. New horizons in stroke rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36(1):19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce N, McNeil J, Graves D, Dunt D. Quality and Outcome Indicators for Acute Healthcare Services. Canberra: Australian Goverment Printing Service; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Michigan: Health Administration Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disabilityand Health: ICF Short Version. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto L, Magalong E. Outcome measures in stroke. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2003;26(4):283–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legg L, Drummond A, Leonardi-Bee J, et al. Occupational therapy for patients with problems in personal activities of daily living after stroke: systematic review of randomised trials. Br Med J. 2007;335:922–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh R, Tennant A, Beiring-Seirensen F, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A. Therapy Outcome Measures for Speech and Language Pathology. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A, Petheram B. Therapy Outcome Measures: Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Nursing. San Diego: Singular; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A, Petheram B. Therapy Outcome Measures for Rehabilitation Professionals: Speech and Language Therapy, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Nursing, Hearing Therapists. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, et al. Therapy Outcome Measures of Allied Health Practitioners in Australia: The AusTOMs. Intl Qual Health Care. 2004;16(4):285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth C. Measuring outcomes using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT): data description and tool sensitivity. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68(8):354–366.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF. Scale Development. Theory and Applications. Vol. 26. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth C, Duncomb D. AusTOMs forOccupational Therapy. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth C, Duncomb D. AusTOMs forOccupational Therapy. 2nd ed. Melbourne: La Trobe University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Morris M, Perry A, Unsworth C, et al. Reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for quantifying disability and health. Intl Ther Rehabil. 2005;12(8):340–346.
   Google Scholar
• Scott F, Unsworth C, Fricke J, Taylor N. Reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT) self-care scale. Aust Occup Then J . 2006;53:265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth C, Duckett S, Duncomb D, Perry A, Skeat J, Taylor N. Validity of the AusTOM Scales: a comparison of the AusTOMs and EuroQo1-5D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unsworth C, Duncomb D. A comparison of client outcomes from two acute care neurological services using self care data from the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68(10):477–482.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Bearup A, Rickard K. Benchmarking OT rehabilitation outcomes for clients with upper limb dysfunction following stroke using the AusTOMs - OT Upper Limb scale. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bullivant JRN. Benchmarking for Continuous Improvement in the Public Sector. Essex, UK: Longman Information & Reference; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P, Hughes A, John A, Petheram B. Using benchmarking data for assessing performance in occupational therapy. Clin Governance: Int J. 2003;8(4):290–295.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. The Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Including the TIM Instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo: UDSmR; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Lai S, van Culin V, Huang L, Clausen D, Wallace D. Development of a comprehensive assessment toolbox for stroke. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15(4):885–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster U. The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19(8):787–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA. The development, validity, and reliabilityof the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire. J Gerontol. 1981;36(4):426–433.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwan J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med. 1981;15A:221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, McColl MA, Carswell A, Baptiste S. Pilot testing of the COPM: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61(4):191–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, et al. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS): a new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 1994;31:119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lynden P, Brott T, Tilley B, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2220–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner. 1964;192:540–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith M. Interrater relaibility of a modified Ashworth scale of spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardieu G, Shentoub S, Delarue R. A la recherched'une technique de mesure de al spasticite. Rev Neurologie. 1954;91:143–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeurisse G, Demol O, Roboye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980;19:382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13:50–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Lead bitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1979;65(2):48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Gowland C, Stratford P, et al. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(4):31–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkei G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JWR, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney Ii, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheikh K, Smith DS, Meade TW, Goldberg E, Brennan PJ, Kinsella G. Repeatability and validity of modified activities of daily living index in studies of chronic disability. Intl Rehabil Med. 1979;1:51–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker MF, Lincoln NB. Factors influencing dressing performance after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:699–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Modification of Rankin Scale: recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JFI, Drinka TJK, Greenberg JR., Farrell-Holtan J., Euhardy R, Schram M. Development and testing of the assessment of living skills and resources (ALSAR) in elderly community dwelling veterans. Gerontologist. 1991;31:84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinka TJK, Williams JFI, Schram M, Farrell JFI, Euhardy R. ALSAR-Revised Format. Madison, WI: Veterans Affairs Medical Center; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983(12):166–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nouni FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. 2nd ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech Language Hearing Association. A functional outcome measure for adults. ASHA. 1995 ;Apri1:40–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state." A practical guide for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle PJ. Measuring health outcomes in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(Suppl 2):539–543.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting S, Lincoln N, Bhavnani G, Cockburn J. RPAB-Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuji T, Liu M, Sonoda S, Domen K, Tsujiuchi K, Chino N. Newly developed short behavior scale for use in stroke outcome research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77(5):376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural Inattention Test. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddely A. RBMT-The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Bury St Edmunds, London: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, Pierce GR. A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications. J Soc Pers Relat. 1987;4:497–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland J, McColl M. Social support and psychosocial dysfunction after stroke: buffering effects in a community sample. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:475–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(277-299):277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: from description to measurement. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(1):199–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J, Huskisson EC. Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38:378–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roland M, Morris R. The study of the natural history of back pain Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibnall JT, Tait RC. Quality of Life Scale: a preliminary study with chronic pain patients. Psycho! Health. 1990;4:283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer W, Dobson AJ, Hall J, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34:585–597.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Branholm I, Fugl-Meyer KS. Happiness and domain specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil. 1991;5:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch MB, Cornell J, Villanueva M, Retzlaff PJ. Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: a measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad M-L. The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73(2):103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Deming R. Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: replication and extension. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10(4):43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nissan SJ, William P, Newman MD. Factors influencing reintegration into normal living after amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:548–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams IL, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Goal planning in stroke rehabilitation: How? Top Stroke Rehabil. 1999;6:16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond AER, Walker MF. A randomized controlled trial of leisure rehabilitation after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1995;9:283–290.
   Google Scholar
• van Campen C, Sixma H, Friele RD, Kerssens JJ, Peters L. Quality of care and patient satisfaction: a review of measuring instruments. Med Care Res Rev. 1995;52:109–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meterko M, Nelson EC, Rubin HR, Batalden DM, Hays RD, Ware JE. Patient judgement of hospital quality: a report of a pilot study. Med Care. 1990;26:S1—S56.
   Google Scholar
• Zarit SH, Todd PA, Zarit IM. Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers: a longitudinal study. Gerontologist. 1986;20(6):260–266.
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsen JC, Van Der Ende PC. The development of a caregiving burden scale. Age Ageing. 1994;23:483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson BC. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. J Gerontol. 1983;38:344–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vertesi A, Darzins P, Edwards M, McEvoy E. Development of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART). Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67:120— 127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar