REFERENCES
- Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2005;8:187�211.
- Coleman KA, Harry J. Functional gait changes in patients with chronic lower extremity hemiplegia treated with technology to induce movement (TIM)-type system. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:43�54.
- Deutsch JE, Merieans AS, Adamovich S, Poizner H, Burdea GC. Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Restorative Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:371�386.
- Coleman KA, Harry J. Development and testing of a novel EMG feedback technology to induce movement. Neuro Report. 2002;26:94–100.
- Teng EL, Chui HC. The modified Mini-Mental State Exam. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:314–318.
- Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
- Soderberg GL, Knutson LM. A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Phys Ther. 2000;80:485–498.
- Baer HR, Wolf SL. Modified emory functional ambulation profile: An outcome measure for the rehabilitation of poststroke gait dysfunction. Stroke. 2001;32:973–979.
- Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
- Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606–1610.
- DiFabio RP, Badke RB. Relationship of sensory organization to balance function in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther. 1990;70:542–548.
- Gladstone DJ, Daniells CJ, Black SE. The Fug I-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232–240.
- Olney S, Griffen M, Monga T, McBride I. Work and power in stroke gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:317–322.
- Kerrigan D, Karvosky M, Riley P. Spastic paretic stiff-legged gait joint kinetics. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:244–249.
- Richards C, Malouin F, Dumas F, Tardif D. Gait velocity as an outcome measure of locomotor recovery after stroke. In: Craik RL, Oatis CA, eds. Gait Analysis: Theory and Application. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995:355–364.
- Nadeau S, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D. Analysis of the clinical factors affecting natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with stroke. Intl Re-habil Res. 1991;14:246–250.
- Dettman MA, Linder MT, Sepic SB. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. Am J Phys Med. 1987;66:77–90.
- Lin PY, Yang YR, Cheng SJ, Wang RY. The relationship between ankle impairments and gait velocity and symmetry in people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:562–568.
- Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Gait. In: Joint Structure and Function: A Comprehensive Analysis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company; 1992:448–495.
- van de Port IGL, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lindeman E, Kwakkel G. Effects of exercise training programs on walking competency after stroke: A systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:935–951.
- Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995;26:982–989.
- Craik RL, Dutterer L. Spatial and temporal characteristics of foot fall patterns. In: Craik RL, Oatis CA, eds. Gait Analysis: Theory and Application. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995:143–158.
- Duetsch JE, Lewis JA. Technical and patient performance using a virtual reality-integrated telerehabilitation system: Preliminary findings. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(1):30–35.