Conceptual Overview of Frameworks for Measuring Quality in Rehabilitation

REFERENCES

• Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality Safety Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ. Overview of Outcome Analysis in Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.; 1987:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. Conceptual model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model_(computer_science). Accessed April 26, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Compact Oxford English Dictionary. Paradigm. AskOxford .com. http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/paradigm?view=uk. Accessed April 26, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Abraham C. Interventions to change health behaviours: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psycho! Health. 2004;19(1):29–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–1748.
   Google Scholar
• Rodkey GV, ltani KM. Evaluation of healthcare quality: a tale of three giants. Am J Surg. 2009;198(5 Suppl):S3–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Needham DM, Koruplu R. Rehabilitation quality improvement in an intensive care unit setting: implementation of a quality improvement model. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):271–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser D. Unraveling the conundrum of quality in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):225–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh K, Gompertz PH, Rudd AG. Stroke care: how do we measure quality? Postgrad Med J. 2002;78(920):322–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol. 1993;50(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, Salonen JT, Riekkinen P. The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke-a controlled trial. Stroke. 1985;16(6):928–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C. The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Herrin JS, Bowen SE, Stevens AB, Uomoto J. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB, Uomoto JM, Herrin J, Bowen SE, Burridge A B. Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1)1 0–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, et al. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(1)1 67–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Horner RD, Duncan PW, Clipp E, Hamilton B. New horizons in stroke rehabilitation research. I Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36(1):19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Sloane R, Horner RD, Zolkewitz M, Duncan PW, Hamilton BB. A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(7):853–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al. Structure, process, and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Med Care. 2002;40(11):1036–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Sloane R, Horner RD, Zolkewitz M, Reker D. Differences in rehabilitation services and outcomes among stroke patients cared for in veterans hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2001;35(6):1293–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reker DM, Hoenig H, Zolkewitz MA, et al. The structure and structural effects of VA rehabilitation bedservice care for stroke. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(4):483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reker DM, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al. Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford VL, Dinsmore JG, Stout RW, Donnellan C, O'Neill D, McGee H. Stroke presentation and hospital management: comparison of neighboring healthcare systems with differing health policies. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2143–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Ebrahim S. Rhetoric and reality in stroke patient care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(10): 1437–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Sabin C, Ebrahim S. Observing the process of care: a stroke unit, elderly care unit and general medical ward compared. Age Ageing. 1999;28(5):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veterans Health Administration. QUER! implementation guide. Quality enhancement research initiative. http://www.queri.research.va.gov/implementation/section_1/part1b.cfm. Accessed April 21, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Total Quality Management Tools. Business excellence: the way business should be done. http://www.bexcellence.org/Total-Quality-Management-Tools.html. Accessed April 21, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Introduction. AHRQ quality indicators. February 2006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/introduction.htm. Accessed April 21, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Quality and Performance. Department of Veterans Affairs. Performance measurement. http://vaww.archve.oqp.med.va.gov/oqp_services/performance_measurement/pm.asp. Accessed April 21, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Berlowitz DR, Stineman M. Risk adjustment in rehabilitation quality improvement. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):252–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Craen K, Braes T, Wellens N, et al. The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. I Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(1):83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong G, Hsieh CH, Gassaway J, et al. Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(8):1269–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG. Measuring case mix, severity, and complexity in geriatric patients undergoing rehabilitation. Med Care. 1997;35(6 Suppl): JS90-105; discussion JS6–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Byers KL, Velozo CA. Validation of FIM-MDS crosswalk conversion algorithm. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(7):1065–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejong G, Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MR Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the "black box" of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):678–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong G, Horn SD, Conroy B, Nichols D, Healton EB. Opening the black box of post-stroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S1–S7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn SD, Delong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12 Suppl 2):S101–S14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACRM Taxonomy Task Force. A Research Agenda for Developing a Rehabilitation Taxonomy. Chicago, IL: American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Ross RN, Maislin G, Gray D. Population-based study of home accessibility features and the activities of daily living: clinical and policy implications. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(15):1165–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001. http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm. Accessed May 10, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8(2): 34–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirschner KL, Breslin ML, lezzoni LI, Sandel E. Attending to inclusion: people with disabilities and health-care reform. PMR. 2009;1(10):957–963.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stineman M, Charles J, Kurichi JE. Grading: an annotated "pen and paper" approach to multidimensional case-mix-adjusted continuous quality improvement. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):262–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Kwong PL, Kurichi JE, et al. The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation in the acute postoperative phase of care after transtibial or transfemoral amputation: study of an integrated health care delivery system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(10)1 863–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Kwong PL, Xie D, et al. Prognostic differences for functional recovery after major lower limb amputation: effects of the timing and type of inpatient rehabilitation services. Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 2(4):232–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol. 2003;15(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker LL, Lenker JA, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Demers L, DeRuyter F. Mobility-related assistive technology device classifications: implications for outcomes research. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(12)1 020–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard Winkler SL, Fitzgerald SG, Cowper-Ripley DC, Hoenig H, Mann WC, Reker DM. Assessment of the National Prosthetics Patient Database: preliminary study of validity. I Rehabil Res Dev. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Needham DM, Truong AD, Fan E. Technology to enhance physical rehabilitation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10 Suppl):5436–441.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Landerman LR, Shipp KM, et al. A clinical trial of a rehabilitation expert clinician versus usual care for providing manual wheelchairs. I Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(10):1712–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prvu Bettger JA, Stineman MG. Effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation services in postacute care: state-of-the-science. A review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(11):1526–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(3): 263–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagura H, Miyai I, Suzuki T, Yanagihara T. Patients with severe stroke benefit most by interdisciplinary rehabilitation team approach. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(4):258–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage B, Stineman M, Deutsch A, et al. Perspectives on the state-of-the-science in rehabilitation medicine and its implications for Medicare postacute care policies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1737–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein LZ, Alessi CA, Josephson KR, Trinidad Hoyl M, Harker JO, Pietruszka FM. A randomized trial of a screening, case finding, and referral system for older veterans in primary care. I Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs CS, Holty JE, Goldstein MK, Garber AM, Wang Y, Feussner JR, Cohen HJ. The effect of geriatrics evaluation and management on nursing home use and health care costs: results from a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(1):91–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen HJ, Feussner JR, Weinberger M, et al. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. N Engl I Med. 2002;346(12):905–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg PO Jr, Auerbach SM, Seel RT, Buenaver LF, Kiesler DJ, Plybon LE. The impact of patient-centered information on patients' treatment satisfaction and outcomes in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Rehabil Psycho!. 2005;50 (4):366–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane JR Effects of Facility Variation on the Outcomes of Stroke Patients in the Veterans Administration's Healthcare System [dissertation]. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Matchar DB, Hoff-Lindquist J, Samsa GP, Horner RD. VA Stroke Study: neurologist care is associated with increased testing but improved outcomes. Neurology. 2003;61(6):792–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose SS. Catastrophic Injury and Illness in the Elderly [dissertation]. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar AM, Warden DL, Schwab K, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program (DVHIP) Study Group. JAMA. 2000;283(23):3075–3081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Harker JO, Miller DK, Wieland D. The Sepulveda GEU Study revisited: long-term outcomes, use of services, and costs. Aging (Milano). 1995;7(3):212–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubenstein LZ, Wieland GD, Josephson KR, Rosbrook B, Sayre J, Kane RL. Improved survival for frail elderly inpatients on a geriatric evaluation unit (GEU): who benefits? I Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41 (5):441–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodo LK, Gerety MB, Mulrow CD, Rhodes MC, Tuley MR. The impact of physical therapy on nursing home patient outcomes. Phys Ther. 1992;72(3)1 68–173; discussion 73–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes SL, Cummings J, Weaver F, Manheim LM, Conrad KJ, Nash K. A randomized trial of Veterans Administration home care for severely disabled veterans. Med Care. 1990;28(2)1 35–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieland D, Rubenstein LZ, Ouslander JG, Martin SE. Organizing an academic nursing home. Impacts on institutionalized elderly. JAMA. 1986;255(19):2622–2627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar