Translating Research Into Clinical Practice: Integrating Robotics Into Neurorehabilitation for Stroke Survivors

REFERENCES

• Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K. Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(2):22–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson MJ. Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke. I Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006;3:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer DJ, Patton IL. Can robots help learning of skilled actions. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 2009;37(1):43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignolo L. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. I Rehabil Med. 2009;41:955–960.
   Google Scholar
• Weinrich M. National Institutes of Health support of rehabilitation robotics research. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(5):xxi-xxii.
   Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(9):528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines not practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;157(4): 408–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenholtz S, Pronovosst PJ. Barriers to translating evidence into practice. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:321–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubenstein LV, Pugh J. Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research. I Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott I. The evolving science of translating research evidence into clinical practice. Evidence Based Med. 2007;12:4–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Cocerill R, Barnsley J, DiCensoA. A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health care policy and practice. I Knowl Synth Nurs. 2002;9:7.
   Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe J. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009;181(3-4):165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. I Clin Epidemiol. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br Med J. 1996; 312:71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence Based Nurs. 2004;1(3)1 76–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahe CG, Sherrington C, Herbert R, Moseley A, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. www.cebm.net.
   Google Scholar
• Tefertiller C, Winchester P, Pharo B, Evans N. Rehabilitation robotics for locomotor training in neurologic disorders: efficacy and applications. I Rehabil Res Dev. In press.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(1):5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2895–2901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. I Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Werner C, Bardeleben A. A mechanized gait trainer for restoring gait in nonambulatory subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81 (9):1158–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freivogel S, Mehrholz J, Husak-Sotomayor T, Schmalohr D. Gait training with the newly developed "LokoHelp"-system is feasible for non-ambulatory patients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. A feasibility study. Brain Inj. 2008;22(7-8):625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckel ND, Blonien N, Nichols D, Hidler J. Abnormal joint torque patterns exhibited by chronic stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern. I Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008;5:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Sarkodie-Gyan T. Gait pattern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(5):401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewer C, Muller F, Husemann B, Heller S, Quintern J, Koenig E. The influence of different Lokomat walking conditions on the energy expenditure of hemiparetic patients and healthy subjects. Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):372–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):693–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlake KP, Patten C. Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke. I Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore 11_, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1786–1792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz I, Sajin A, Fisher I, et al. The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. PMR. 2009;1(6):516–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D. A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):701–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38(2):349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Frohlich K, Saltuari L. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21(4):307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, et al. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(1):17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1298–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS, So EF. Gait training of patients after stroke using an electromechanical gait trainer combined with simultaneous functional electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 2006;86(9):1282–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64(1):35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation. Adv Neurol. 2003;92:429–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkers MP, deBear PC, Erandson RF, Kristy K, Geer DM, Nichols A. Client and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. I Rehabil Res Dev. 191;28:33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M, Rittenhouse M, Abdullah HA. Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: results from a survey of physiotherapists. I Intelligent Robotic Syst. 2005;42:239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(6):22–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison SA, Backus D. Locomotor training: Is translating evidence into practice financially feasible?J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(2):50–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar