Attention Deficits After Incident Stroke in the Acute Period: Frequency Across Types of Attention and Relationships to Patient Characteristics and Functional Outcomes

REFERENCES

• Tuhrim S. Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation. Gordon, WA: Andover Medical Publishers; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Nys GMS. The Neuropsychology of Acute Stroke: Characterisation and Prognostic Implications [dissertation]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach J, Mulder T, van Limbeek J, Donders R, Schoonderwaldt H. Cognitive decline following stroke: a comprehensive study of cognitive decline following stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20: 503–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard C, Stephens S, Kenny J, Kalaria R, Tovee M, O'Brien J. Profile of neuropsychological deficits in older stroke survivors without dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003;16:52–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JE, Rockwood K, Beattie BL, et al. Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population. Lancet. 1997;349:1793–1796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall S, Grinnell D, Heisel B, Newall A, Hunt L. Attention deficits in stroke patients: a visual dual task experiment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowd J, Filion DL, Pohl PS, Richards LG, Stiers W. Attentional abilities and functional outcomes following stroke.] Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58:45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. Perception and Communication. London, UK: Pergamon Press; 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman A. Selective attention in man. Br Med Bull. 1964;20:12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychol. 1980;12: 97–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch JA, Deutsch D. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psycho/ Rev. 1963;70:80–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman D. Towards a theory of memory and attention. Psycho' Rev. 1968;75:522–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Allport DA, Antonis B, Reynolds P. On the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Q1 Exp Psychol. 1972;24: 225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower GH, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press; 1974:47–89.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cognitive Sci. 2000;4:417–423.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M, Howieson D, Loring D. Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MN, Mateer CA. Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation, Theory and Practice. New York: Guilford Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Partington JE, Leiter RG. Partington's pathway test. Psychol Service Center Bull. 1949;1:9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gronwall D. Paced auditory serial addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Motor Skills. 1977;44:367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton T, Ashburn A, Stack E. A pilot study of attention deficits, balance control and falls in the subacute stage following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology. 1997;11:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt R. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioural Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;38:e100-el 43.
   Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Parag V, Senior H, Rodgers A. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training: a randomised controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40: 3293–3298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon SH, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, Min-Lai S. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2004;35:918–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier L, DeHaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Intl Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;11:49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen 0. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford JA, Turner A. Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test Manual. Richmond, VA: Braintrain Inc; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Strauss, E. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo SL. Depression and anxiety 3 months post stroke: prevalence and correlates. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22:519–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachinski V, ladecola C, Petersen RC, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37:2220–2241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larabee GJ, Curtiss G. Construct validity of various visual and verbal memory tests. 1 Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995;17:536–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg H, Jacobaeus H, Hirvikoski T, et al. Computerised working memory training after stroke: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2007;21:21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney Fl, Barthel, D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med 1965;14:56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi ML. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61:355–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade, DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:61–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke. 1990;21:78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Users Manual. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Dorman P, Slattery J, Farrell B, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the Eurociol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke: results from the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. Stroke. 2000;31: 440–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams L, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Biller J. Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients. Neurology. 1999;53:1839–1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanson-Fisher RW, Perkins JJ. Adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Australia.] Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51: 961–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Carter C, Hackett M, Feigin V, Barber A, Bonita R. Trends and disparities in stroke incidence in Auckland, New Zealand, during 1981 to 2003. Stroke. 2005;36:2087–2093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott KM, Tobias MI, Sarfati D, Haslett SJ. SF-36 Health Survey reliability, validity and norms for New Zealand. Aust N Z I Public Health. 1999;23:401–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott KM, Sarfati D, Tobias MI, Haslett SJ. A challenge to the cross-cultural validity of the SF-36 Health Survey: factor structure in Maori, Pacific and New Zealand European ethnic groups. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1655–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:825–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. Determinants of handicap 1 and 3 years after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19:205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Thrift AG. Determinants of handicap after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004;35:715–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Mant J, Carter J, Wade D, Winner S. The London Handicap Scale: A re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;6:365–367.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford J, Sandercock PAG, Warlow CP, Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989;20:828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. prognosis. Scottish Med I 1957;2:200–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sulter G, Steen C, De KJ. Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1538–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg P. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, Berkshire, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg P. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Wood VA, Hewer RL. Recovery of cognitive function soon after stroke: a study of visual neglect, attention span and verbal recall. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51:10–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks MH. Validation of the General Health Questionnaire in a young community sample. Psycho/ Med. 1983;13:349–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skuse D, Williams P. Screening for psychiatric disorder in general practice. Psycho/ Med. 1984;14:365–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DP, Rickels K, Downing R, Hesbacher P. A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. Br I Psychiatry. 1976;129:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing JK, Cooper JE, Sartorius N. Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms: An Instruction Manual for PSE and Catego Program. London, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Romans-Clarkson SE, Walton VA, Herbison GP, Mullen PE. Validity of the GHQ-28 in New Zealand women. Aust N Z Psychiatry. 1989;23:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkstein SE, Robinson RG, Price TR. Comparison of patients with and without poststroke major depression matched for size and location of lesion. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:247–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent D, Cooper PF, Fitzgerald P, Parkes KR. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br Clin Psychol. 1982;21:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace CI. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire: evidence for dimensionality and construct validity. Pers Individual Differences. 2004;37:307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JC, Kass SJ, Stanny Cl. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire revisited: dimensions and correlates.] Gen Psycho/. 2002;129 238–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boosman H, Passier PE, Visser-Meily JM, Rinkel G, Post MW. Validation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (55-Q0L) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorhage. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(5):485–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman D, Ashburn A. People with stroke living in the community: attention deficits, balance, ADL ability and falls. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25: 817–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding KL, Judah RD, Grant CE. Outcome-based comparison of Ritalin versus food-supplement treated children with AD/HD. Alternative Med Rev. 2003;8:319–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tinius TR The Intermediate Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test as a neuropsycho-logical measure. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18:199-214.
   Google Scholar
• Appelros P, Karlsson G, Seiger A, Nydevik I. Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and relationship to disability. 1 Rehabil Med. 2002;34:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehkonen M, Lai hosalo M, Kettunen J. Anosognosia after stroke: assessment, occurrence, subtypes, and impact on functional outcome reviewed. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2006;114: 293–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gialanella B, Monguzzi V, Santoro R, Rocchi S. Functional recovery after hemiplegia in patients with neglect: the rehabilitative role of anosognosia. Stroke. 2005;36:2687–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte K, Hillis AE. Recent advances in the understanding of neglect and anosognosia following right hemisphere stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009;9:459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floel A, Buyx A, Breitenstein C, Lohmann H, Knecht S. Hemispheric lateralization of spatial attention in right- and left-hemispheric language dominance. Behav Brain Res. 2005;158: 269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushworth MF, Ellison A, Walsh V. Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neurosci. 2001;4: 656–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner ML, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar