REFERENCES
- Kaufman SR. Toward a phenomenology of boundaries in medicine: chronic illness experience in the case of stroke. Med Anthropol Q. 1988;2(4):338–354.
- Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88(2):251–258.
- Frank G. On embodiment: a case study of congenital limb deficiency in American culture. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1986;10(3):189–219.
- Congress of the United States, CBO. Research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments: issues and options for an expanded federal role. December 1, 2009. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8891/12-18-ComparativeEffectiveness.pdf.
- Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness. Research report to the President and Congress. December 1, 2009; 6. http://www.hhs.govirecovery/programs/cericerannualrpt.pdf.
- VHA Office of Information. VHA Corporate Databases Monograph. 2006.
- Stineman MG, Ross RN, Maislin G, Marchuk N, Hijirida S, Weiner M. Recovery preference exploration: analysis of patient feedback after imagined scenarios. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(4):272–281.
- Kleiman S. Phenomenology: to wonder and search for meanings. Nurse Researcher 2004;11(4):7–19.
- Kogan SM, Gale JE. Decentering therapy: textual analysis of a narrative therapy session. Family Process. 1997;36(2):101–126.
- Kurz AE, Saint-Louis N, Burke J, Stineman MG. Exploring the personal reality of disability and recovery: a tool for empowering the rehabilitation process. Qua! Health Res. 2008;18(1):90–105.
- Lobchuk MM. Concept analysis of perspective-taking: meeting informal caregiver needs for communication competence and accurate perception. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(3):330–341.
- Rist PM, Freas DW, Maislin G, Stineman MG. Recovery from disablement: what functional abilities do rehabilitation professionals value the most? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8): 1600–1606.
- Brown M, Gordon WA. Empowerment in measurement: "muscle," "voice," and subjective quality of life as a gold standard. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4 Suppl 2):S13–20.
- Tervo RC, Palmer G, Redinius P. Health professional student attitudes towards people with disability. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):908–915.
- Stineman MG, Maislin G, Nosek M, Fiedler R, Granger CV. Comparing consumer and clinician values for alternative functional states: application of a new feature trade-off consensus building tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(12): 1522-1529.
- Stineman MG, Qu W. Untangling function: measuring the severity, type and meaning of disabilities. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(4):543–549.
- Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136.
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
- Crow L. Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In: Mercer CBG, ed. Exploring the Divide. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press; 1996:55–72.
- Stineman MG. A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8(2):34–45.
- Stineman MG, Rist PM, Burke JP. Through the clinician's lens: objective and subjective views of disability. Qua! Health Res. 2009;19(1):17–29.