Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-9 (CAHAI-9): Perceived Clinical Utility Within 14 Days of Stroke

REFERENCES

• Lannin NA. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(2):109–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca SR, Stratford PW, Lambert CL, Masters LM, Streiner DL. Test-retest reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: a new measure of upper limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;56:1616–1622.
   Google Scholar
• Woodson AM. Stroke. In: Trombly CA, ed. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams 61 Wilkins; 1995:677–704.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland TJ, Cooke DM, Gustafsson LA. Role of occupational therapy after stroke. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2008;11(suppl):s99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Woodson A. Stroke. In: Trombly CA, Radomski M, eds. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, VVilliams Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall F, McCreary E. Muscles: Testing and Function. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon R, Smith M. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer A, Lindmark B. Test-retest reliability of grip force in patients with stroke. I Rehabil Med. 2003;35:189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Then I Res. 1985;5(1):24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Thonnard J-L, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a Rasch-Built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1038–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta M, Testio L, Arnould C. The ABILHAND Questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients. Stroke. 2001;32:1627–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole IL, Whitney SL. Assessments of motor function post stroke: a review. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;19(2):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE. Assessing upper limb motor function in clients with stroke. Phys Disabil. 2003;26(2):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins J, Mayo NE, Desroiers J, Salbach NM. Upper-limb function and recovery in the acute phase post-stroke. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;42(1):65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger C, Hamilton B. The Uniform Data System for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1990. Am I Phy Med Rehabil. 1992;71(4):108–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chae J, Labatia I, Yang G. Upper limb motor function in hemiparesis. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland TJ, Gustafsson LM. Assessments of upper limb ability following stroke: a review. Br I Occup Ther. 2008;71(10):427–437.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Gowland C, Stratford P, et al. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: item selection. Physiotherapy Canada. 1999; Summer:209–211.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca SR. Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: Administration Manual. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: McMaster University, School of Rehabilitation Science; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca SR, Gowland C, Stratford PW, et al. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(4):31–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law M. Measurement in occupational therapy: scientific criteria for evaluation. Can I Occup Ther. 1987;54(3):133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can I Occup Ther. 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Josman N, Birnboim S. Measuring kitchen performance: what assessment should we choose? Scand Occup Ther. 2001;8:193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baum C, Dunn W. Measuring Occupational Performance: Supporting Best Practice in Occupational Therapy. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Payne S, Howell C. An evaluation of the clinical use of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills with children. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68(6):277–280.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly C, Carswell A. Individualised outcome measures: a review of the literature. Can I Occup Ther. 2002;69(2):84–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mew MM, Fossey E. Client-centred aspects of clinical reasoning during an initial assessment using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Aust Occup Then. 1996;43:155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Petty L, McArthur L, Treviranus J. Clinical report: Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in vision technology. Can I Occup Ther. 2005;72(5):309–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wressle E, Eriksson L, Fahlander A., Rasmusson I-M, Tedemalm U, Tangmark K. Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation: development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire. Scand I Caring Sci. 2006;20:135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl M, Paterson M, Davies D, Doubt L, Law M. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Therapy Performance Measure. Can I Occup Ther. 2000;67(1):22–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corben L, Downie S, Fielding L, et al. Upper Limb Assessment for the Acute Neurological Patient: Research or Quality Improvement Project Grant 2005. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: OT Australia; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Barbara A, Whiteford G. Clinical utility of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool: an investigation of its use with the aged people in hospital. Aust Occup Then. 2005;52:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Rodger S, Daley E, Hughes K., Ziviani J. Dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children: perceived utility in Australian occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52:337–349.
   Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure — Swedish version. Can I Occup Ther. 2002;69(1):40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gustafsson S, Sunnerhagen KS, Dahlin-lvanoff S. Occupational therapists' and patients' perceptions of ABILHAND, a new assessment tool for measuring manual ability. Scand I Occup Ther. 2004;11:107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, King G, Russell D, MacKinnon E, Hurley P, Murphy C. Measuring outcomes in children's rehabilitation: a decision protocol. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:629–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron D, Leslie M, Teplicky R, et al. The clinical utility of the Test of Playfulness. Can I Occup Ther. 2001;68(2):104–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James S, Corr S. The Morriston Occupational Therapy Outcome Measure (MOTOM): measuring what matters. Br J Occup Ther. 2004;67(5):210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MR Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland T, Gustafsson L, Henderson R, Turpin M, Read S. Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-9: an investigation of clinical utility in acute stroke occupational therapy assessment. Int Ther Rehabil. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Barreca SR. Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-9 [DVD]. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA, Neistadt ME. Introduction to evaluation and intervention. In: Blesdell Crepeau E, Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA, eds. Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams 61 Wilkins; 2003:279–298.
   Google Scholar
• Schell BA. Professional reasoning in practice. In: Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA, eds. Willard Spackman's Occupational Therapy. 11th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009:314–327.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Short version edition. Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 2001.
   Google Scholar