Superior Colliculi Involvement in Poststroke Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Pilot Study

REFERENCES

• Jutai J, Bhogal K, Foley N, Bayley M, TeaseII W, Speechley M. Treatment of visual perceptual disorders post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(2):77–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol. 1979;5(2):166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh SF, Hill KD, Doss KJ, Goldie PA, Culham EG. Balance score and a history of falls in hospital predict recurrent falls in the 6 months following stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1583–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso G, Pizzamiglio L. The role of unilateral spatial neglect in rehabilitation of right brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: a matched comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:743–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luaute J, Halligan P, Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D. Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:961–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen A, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(2):CD003586.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartolomeo P, de Schotten T, Doricchi F. Left unilateral neglect as disconnection syndrome. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:2479–2490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mort JD, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain. 2003;126:1986–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnath H, Berger MF, Kuker W, Rorden C. The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:1164–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce S, Buxbaum L. Treatment of unilateral neglect: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:256–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogourtsova T, Korner-Bitensky N, Ptito A. Contribution of the superior colliculi to post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect and recovery. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(9):2407–2416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague JM. Interaction of cortex and the superior colliculus in the mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat. Science. 1966;153:1544-1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman N. Distractibility following simultaneous bilateral lesions of the superior colliculus or medial frontal cortex in rats. Behav Brain Res. 1983;8(2):177–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton P, Dean P, Redgrave R Detection of visual stimuli in far periphery by rats: possible role of the superior colliculus. Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(3):559–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton P, Dean P. Detection of visual stimuli after lesions of the superior colliculus in the rat; deficit not confined to the far periphery. Behav Brain Res. 1988;31 (1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirvel RD. Sensorimotor responsiveness in rats with unilateral superior collicular and amygdaloid lesions. I Comp Physiol Psycho!. 1975;89(8):882–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flandrin JM, Jeannerod M. Effects of unilateral superior colliculus ablation on oculomotor and vestibulo-ocular responses in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(1):73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facteau IFI, Bell AH, Munoz DR Neural correlated of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention.J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:1728–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal, and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. B, Biol Sci. 1999;354:1325–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomber SG, Payne BR, Cornwell P. Role of the superior colliculus in analyses of spaces: superficial and intermediate layer contribution to visual orienting, auditory orienting, and visuospatial discrimination during unilateral and bilateral deactivations. J Comp Neurol. 2001;441:44–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne B, Lomber S, Geeraerts S., van der Gucht E, Vandenbussche E. Reversible visual hemineglect. Neurobiology. 1996;93:290–294.
   Google Scholar
• Lomber S, Payne B. Removal of two halves restores the whole: reversal of visual hemineglect during bilateral cortical or collicular inactivation in the cat. Vis Neurosci. 1996;13:1143–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomber S, Payne B, Hilgetag C, Rushmore J. Restoration of visual orienting into a cortically blind hemifield by reversible deactivation of posterior parietal cortex or the superior colliculus. Exp Brain Res. 2002;142:463–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman M. The effect of superior colliculus lesions upon the visual field of cats with cortical ablations. J Comp Neurol. 1977;172:211–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace S, Rosenquist A, Sprague J. Recovery from cortical blindness mediated by destruction of nontectotectal fibers in the commissure of the superior colliculus in the cat. J Comp Neuro1.1989;284:429–450.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson E, Richardson J, Sherk H. Accurate visual guidance despite severe neglect. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:2214–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushmore RJ, Valero-Cabre A, Lomber SG, Hilgetag CC, Payne BR. Functional circuitry underlying visual neglect. Brain. 2006;129\(Pt7):1803–1821.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fries W. Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: a retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase. I Comp Neurol. 1984;230(1):55–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton GB, Goldberg ME, Bruce Cl. Frontal eye field efferents in the macaque monkey: II. Topography of the terminal fields in midbrain and pons. I Comp Neurol. 1998;271: 483–506.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JC, Hoover JE, Strick PL. Input to the primate frontal eye field from the substantia nigra, superior colliculus, and dentate nucleus demonstrated by transneuronal transport. Exp Brain Res. 1994;100:181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. Frontal eye field neurons orthodromically activated from the superior colliculus. I Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3331–3335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crapse TB, Sommer MA. Frontal eye field neurons with spatial representations predicted by their subcortical input. I Neurosci. 2009;29(16):5308–5318.
   Google Scholar
• Barbas H, Mesulam MM. Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey. I Comp Neurol. 1981;200(3):407–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Rakic PS, Porrino U. The primate mediodorsal (MD) nucleus and its projections to the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol. 1985;242(4):535–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating EG, Gooley SG. Saccadic disorders caused by cooling the superior colliculus or the frontal eye field, or from combined lesions of both structures. Brain Res.1988;438(1-2):247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz DP, Istvan PJ. Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus. I Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1193–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weddell RA. Subcortical modulation of spatial attention including evidence that the Sprague effect extends to man. Brain Cogn. 2004;55(3):497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savazzi S, Marzi CA. The superior colliculus subserves interhemispheric neural summation in both normals and patients with a total section or agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1608–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J. Divided attention: evidence for co-activation with redundant signals. Cogn Psycho!. 1982;14:247–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leh ES, Mullen KT, Ptito A. Absence of s-cone input in human blindsight. Eur I Neurosci. 2006; 24(10):2954–2960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leh ES, Johansen-Berg H, Ptito A. Unconscious vision: new insights into the neuronal correlate of blindsight using diffusion tractography. Brain. 2006;129:1822–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEiller-Oehring EM, Schutle T, Kasten E, et al. Parallel interhemispheric processing in hemineglect: relation to visual field defects. Neuropsychologia, 2009;47(12):2397–2408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Rafal RD. Cognitive theories of attention and the rehabilitation of attentional deficits. In: Meier MJ, Benton A, Diller L, eds. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Swan L. Unilateral spatial neglect. Phys Ther. 2001;81(9):1572–1580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beis J, Andre J, Baumgarten A, Challier B. Eye patching in unilateral spatial neglect: efficacy of two methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butter C. Kirsch N. Combined and separate effects of eye patching and visual stimulation on unilateral neglect following a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1133–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker R, Young A, Lincoln N. Eye patching and the rehabilitation of visual neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1996;3:219–231.
   Google Scholar
• Zeloni G, Fame A, Baccini M. Viewing less to see better. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(2):195–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett AM, Crucian GP, Beversdorf DQ, Heilman KM. Monocular partching may worsen sensory-attentional neglect: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:516–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serfaty C, Soroker N, Glicksohn, J, Sepkuti J, Myslobodsky MS. Does monocular viewing improve target detection in hemispatial neglect? Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1995;9:77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Soroker N, Cohen T, Baratz C, Glicksohn J, Myslobodsky MS. Is there a place for ipsilesional eye patching in neglect rehabilitation? Behav Neurol. 1994;7:159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez M, Charter R, Mostafavi B, Nibut L, Smith W. Psychometric properties of the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination. Assessment. 2005;12:137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont WD, Plummer WD. Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schenkenberg T, Bradforf DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurological impairments. Neurology. 1980;30:509–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioral Inattention Test. Bury St. Edmonds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Jehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P, Koivisto AM, Laippala P, Vilkki J. How to detect visual neglect in acute stroke. Lancet. 1998;351:727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P. Test-retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in patients with stroke: star cancellation, line bisection, and the baking tray task. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14(4):403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon-Nair A, Korner-Bitensky N. Evaluating unilateral spatial neglect post-stroke: working your way through the maze of assessment choices. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(3):41–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindell AB, Jalas MJ, Tenovuo O, Brunila T, Voeten, MJ, Hämäläinen H. Clinical assessment of hemispatial neglect: evaluation of different measures and dimensions. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21(3);479–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelelli P, De Luca M, Spinelli D. Contrast sensitivity loss in the neglected hemifield. Cortex. 1998;34(1):139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque R. SPSS Programming and Data Management: A Guide for SPSS and SAS Users. 4th ed. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA. Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organ Res Methods. 2004;7(2):127–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corder GW, Foreman DI. Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach. Somerset, NJ: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kaizer F, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo N, Becker R, Coopersmith H. Response time of stroke patients to a visual stimulus. Stroke. 1988;19:335–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide W, Kompf D. Combined deficits of saccades and visuo-spatial exploration after cortical lesions. Exp Brain Res. 1998;132:164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hafed ZM, Goffart L, Krauzlis RJ. A neural mechanisms for microsaccade generation in the primate superior colliculus. Science. 2009;323:940–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafed ZM, Krauzlis RJ. Goal representations dominate superior colliculus activity during extrafoveal tracking. J Neurosci. 2008;28(38):9426–9439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port NL, Wurtz RH. Target selection and saccade generation in monkey superior colliculus. Exp Brain Res. 2009;192:465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovskaya M, Soroker N, Bonneh Y. Extinction is not a natural consequence of unilateral spatial neglect: evidence from contrast detection experiments. Neurosci Lett. 2007;420: 240–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geeraerts S, Michiels K, Lafosse C, Vandenbussche E, Verfaillie K. The relationship of visual extinction to luminanced contrast imbalances between left and right hemifield sitmuli. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43:542–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider KA, Kastner, S. Visual responses of the human superior colliculus: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study.J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2491–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacoboni M, Ptito A, Weekes Y, Zaidel E. Parallel visuomotor processing in the split brain: cortico-subcortical interactions. Brain. 2000;123: 759–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodics T, Cohen L. Functional neuroimaging in motor recovery after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(2):15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar