Barriers to the Implementation of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Into Practice

REFERENCES

• Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, WeiIler C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:204–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris D, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the interven-tion protocol. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42: 257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brogardh C, Flanabjer U. What is the long-term benefit of constraint-induced movement therapy? A four-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:418–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl AE, Askim T, Stock R, Langorgen E, Lydersen S, Indredavik B. Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:436–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. Neurorehabilitation. 2006;21:93–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronc motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30: 586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe VT, Blanton S, Wolf SL. Long-term follow-up after constraint-induced therapy: a case report of a chronic stroke survivor. Am I Occup Ther. 2009;63:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Stroke Network; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care: 2010. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadan Stroke Strategy; 2010. http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2010BPR_ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. http://www.strokefoundation.com.au. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010;41:2309–2315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 1977:335–374.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371–401.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42:241–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman Al. Effect of deafferentation on a conditioned avoidance response. Science. 1958;128:842–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman Al. Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol. 1963;7:305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassek AM. Inactivation of voluntary motor function following rhizotomy. I Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1953;12:83–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Ellman SJ, Berman Al. Deafferentation of monkeys: effect on conditioned grasp response. Science. 1966;151:593–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Heitmann RD, Barro G. Alertness, level of activity, and purposive movement following somatosensory deafferentation in monkeys. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1977;290:348–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology. 2009;73:195–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC, Szaflarski JP, Kissela BM. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stoke: results of a single blinded randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi YX, Tian JFI, Yang KH, Zhao Y. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:972–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atherosclerosis Rep. 2001;3:279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1867–1873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen J, Wang R, Chen H, Hong C. Effectiveness of modified contraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb function in stroke subjects. Acta Neurologica Taiwanica. 2005;14:16–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Khoury JC. Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke. 2009;40:551–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogàrdh C, Sjölund BH. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:218–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosomi M, Koyama T, Takebayashi T, et al. A modified method for constraint-induced movement therapy: a supervised self-training protocol. I Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. In press. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark VW, Uswatte G. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke. 2005;36: 1301–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Taub E, Schwandt D, Postman M, Hardin P, Uswatte G. Automated constraint-induced therapy extension for movement deficits after stroke. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:249–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Uswatte G, Taub E, Hardin P, Mark VW. A telerehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. I Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Barzel A, Liepert J, Haevernick K, et al. Comparison of two types of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27:673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker J, Pink MJ. Occupational therapists and the use of constraint-induced movement therapy in neurological practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56:436–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood J, Clark PC, Blanton S, Aycock DM, Wolf SL. Pain, fatigue, and intensity of practice in people with stroke who are receiving constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1241–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogardh C, Lexell J. A 1-year follow-up after shortened constraint-induced movement therapy with and without mitt poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:460–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris DM, Barman J, Crago JE. Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of constraint-induced movement therapy to treatment outcome. Neurorehabilitation. 2006;21:147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman MH, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. A treatment for a chronic stroke patient with a plegic hand combining CI therapy with conventional rehabilitation procedures: case report. Neurorehabilitation. 2006;21:167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chung HY, Wu CY, et al. Constraint-induced therapy versus control intervention in patients with stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhaol L, Zhu QX, Li J, Meng PP. Comparison of conventional therapy, intensive therapy and modified constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper extremity function after stroke. I Rehabil Med. 2011;43:619–625.
   Google Scholar
• Sun SF, Hsu CW, Sun HP, Hwang CW, Yang CL, Wang IL. Combined botulinum toxin type A with modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with upper extremity spasticity: a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SC. The VECTORS study. When too much of a good thing is harmful. Neurology. 2009;73:170–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD004433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur I Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46:537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayner K, Gibson G, Giles GM. Comparison of constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral treatment of equal intensity in people with chronic upper-extremity dysfunction after cerebrovascular accident. Am I Occup Ther. 2010;64:528–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of contraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31:2984–2988.
   Google Scholar
• Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, et al. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39: 1520–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar