Occupational Gaps in Everyday Life One Year After Stroke and the Association With Life Satisfaction and Impact of Stroke

REFERENCES

• National Board of Health and Welfare. National Guidelines for Stroke Care. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg G, Bagust A, Terent A. A model for costs of stroke services. Health Policy. 2003;63(1): 81–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Hahn M, Baum C, Dromerick AW. The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;15(4):151–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson G, Tham K, Borg J. Occupational gaps in everyday life 1–4 years after acquired brain injury. I Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson U, Hogberg H, BernspSng B. Participation in everyday occupations in a late phase of recovery after brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(2):116–125.
   Google Scholar
• Amarshi E, Artero L, Reid D. Exploring social and leisure participation among stroke survivors: Part 2. Intl Ther Rehabil. 2006;13: 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Stroke Register. Riks-stroke. Ett or efter stroke;1-eirsuppföljning 2009. www.riks-stroke.org. Accessed January 19, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, ICE Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):507–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Kottorp A, Borg J, Tham K. Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. I Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Brännholm I-B, Fugl-Meyer K. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil. 1991;5:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meeberg GA. Quality of life: a concept analysis. I Adv Nurs. 1993;18(1):32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Tham K, Fugl-Meyer AR. Couples' happiness and its relationship to functioning in everyday life after brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12(1):40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekstam L, Uppgard B, von Koch L, Tham K. Functioning in everyday life after stroke: a longitudinal study of elderly people receiving rehabilitation at home. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21(4):434–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, Low JTS, Ashburn A, George SL, McLellan DL. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(16):860–866.
   Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Tufvesson B, lwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(3):127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(7): 559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson T, Hammel J. Measurement of participation: intersecting person, task, and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010;91 (suppl 9):529–S33.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(8):1035–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. I Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5):239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Viitanen M, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bernspang B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in long-term survivors after stroke. Scand I Rehabil Med. 1988;20(1): 17–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster U. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards B, O'Connell B. Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):1127–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulter-Asberg K, Sonn U. The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;21:171–177.
   Google Scholar
• Bernspàng B, Fisher AG. Differences between persons with right or left cerebral vascular accident on the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(12):1144–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J. 1965;14: 61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govan L, Langhorne P, Weir Cl. Categorizing stroke prognosis using different stroke scales. Stroke. 2009;40:3396–3399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadaria KS, Bohannon RW, Lee N, Maljanian R. Ratings of physical function obtained by interview are legitimate for patients hospitalized after stroke. Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;10(2):79–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81\(suppl 2):S21–S29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, ed. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman 61 Hall; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Jonsson H, Tham K, Eriksson G. A comparison of perceived occupational gaps in everyday life between people with stress-related ill-health or musculoskeletal pain and a reference group [published online ahead of print]. Scand I Occup Ther. 2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, Smout RJ, Delong G. Timing initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86\(suppl 2):534–540.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steultjens EMJ, Dekker J, Bouter LM., van de Nes JCM, Cup EHC, van den Ende CHM. Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003; 34:676–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28:1550–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveen U, Thommessen B, Bautz-Holter E., Wyller TB., Laake K.. Well-being and instrumental activities of daily living after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(3):267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Ma H. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke. Part I: restoration of roles, tasks, and activities. Am I Occup Ther. 2002;56:250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röding J, Glader EL, Maim J, Lindstrom B. Life satisfaction in younger individuals after stroke: different predisposing factors among men and women. I Rehabil Med. 2010;42(2):155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson GE, Moller A, Blomstrand C. Consequences of mild stroke in persons <75 years - a 1-year follow-up. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(4):383–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to education, employment situation, health and physical activity. I Rehabil Med. 2003;35(2):84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM. The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2477–2484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Reker DM, Horner RD, et al. Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-specific outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(5):493–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1480–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin J, Nordlund A, Ekberg K., Swedish Hospital Discharge R. Increasing stroke incidence in Sweden between 1989 and 2000 among persons aged 30 to 65 years: evidence from the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register. Stroke. 2004;35(5):1047–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Baum C, Connor LT. Changing face of stroke: implications for occupational therapy practice. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(5):621–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar