A Novel Virtual Reality System Integrating Online Self-Face Viewing and Mirror Visual Feedback for Stroke Rehabilitation: Rationale and Feasibility

REFERENCES

• Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, Samsa GP. Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2523–2528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22: 281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras MD, Gokkaya NK, Comert D, Kaya DA, Cakci A. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: results from a national rehabilitation hospital in Turkey. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:220–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi YX, Tian JH, Yang KH., Zhao Y Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:972–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton DA, Cauraugh JH, Hausenblas HA. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/ hand functions: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2004;223:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl I Med. 2010;362:1772–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelsen T, Bonita R. Stroke in developing countries: a continuing challenge. Stroke Rev. 2003;7: 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons L, Sharma N, Baron JC, Pomeroy VM. Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:5:458–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro GM, Cattaneo L. Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2009;5:24–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lacoboni M, Mazziotta JC. Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbri-Destro M, Rizzolatti G. The mirror system in monkeys and humans. Physiology. 2008:23: 171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C. Is mirror therapy all it is cracked up to be? Current evidence and future directions. Pain. 2008;138:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns MS. Application of neuroscience to technology in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:6:570–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucca LF. Virtual reality and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: a generation of progress? J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1003–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Jessel AS. Virtual reality applications to work. Work.1998;11 :277–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McElligott JM, Greenwald BD, Watanabe TK. Congenital and acquired brain injury. 4. New frontiers: neuroimaging, neuroprotective agents, cognitive-enhancing agents, new technology, and complementary medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84 (Suppl 1):S18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86: 2218–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery, Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:2:52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch JE, Mirelman A. Virtual reality based approaches to enable walking for people poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:6:45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaggioli A, Morganti F, Walker R, et al. Training with computer supported motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation. CyberPsychol Behav. 2004;7:327–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray CD, Patchick E, Pettifer S, Caillette F, Howard T. Immersive virtual reality as a rehabilitative technology for phantom limb experience: a protocol. CyberPsychol Behav. 2006;9:167–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eng K, Siekierka E, Pyk P, et al. Interactive visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation. Med Bio Eng Comput. 2007;45:901–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui J, Zhu Y, Han S. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended condition: an event-related brain potential study. Neuroreport. 2006;20: 17: 4: 423–427.
   Google Scholar
• Tong F, Nakayama K. Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. I Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999;25:1016–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher T, Senior C, Phillips M, et al. Recognizing one's own face. Cognition. 2001;78:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2005 Update. Dallas, TX: Author; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Mansouri K, Hasson S. A neurophysiological and clinical study of Brunnstrom recovery stages in the upper limb following stroke. Brain Inj. 2010;24:1372–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System, Memorandum no. 45. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as an outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyros AA, Lourakis MIA. Real time tracking of multiple skin-colored objects with a possibly moving camera. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV'04). 2004;368–379.
   Google Scholar
• Sebe N, Cohen I, Huang TS, Gevers T. Skin detection: a Bayesian network approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 2004; 903–906.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo A, Kim Gl. A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy. Presence. 2005;14:2:119–146.
   Google Scholar
• Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD008349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanney KM, Kennedy RS, Drexler JM, Harm DL. Motion sickness and proprioceptive aftereffects following virtual environment exposure. Appl Ergonomics. 1999;30:27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JFI, Ku J, Cho W, et al. A virtual reality system for the assessment and rehabilitation of the activities of daily living. CyberPsychol Behav. 2003;6:383–388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rand D, Kizony R, Weiss PT. The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. I Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32: 155–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keyes H, Brady N. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. QJ Exp Psychol. 2010;63: 840–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin LQ, Kaplan JT, Molnar-Szakacs I., Zaidel E., lacoboni M. Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal "mirror" network in the right hemisphere: an event-related fMRI study. Neurolmage. 2005;25:926–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiura M, Shah NJ, Zilles K, Fink GR. Cortical representations of personally familiar objects and places: functional organization of the human posterior cingulate cortex. I Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:183–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar