Comparison of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Upper Extremity Task Performance After Stroke

REFERENCES

• Tease II RW, Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:29–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Bilateral arm training: Why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23:29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:241–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke. 2002;33:1589–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:23-37.
   Google Scholar
• Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: a pilot study. I Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21:124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2390–2395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, et al. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Upper extremity retraining following stroke: effects of bilateral practice. I Neurol Rehabil. 1996;10:167–184.
   Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chang YF, Wu CY, Chen YA. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chen YA, Chen CL, Wu CY, Chang YE The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JJ, Kagerer FA, Garry MI, Hiraga CY, Loftus A, Cauraugh JFI. Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a TMS study. I Neurol Sci. 2007;252:76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Neurophysiological and behavioural adaptations to a bilateral training intervention in individuals following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:48–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijs E, Matyas TA. Bilateral training does not facilitate performance of copying tasks in poststroke hemiplegia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Corriveau H, Gosselin S, Bravo G. Effectiveness of unilateral and symmetrical bilateral task training for arm during the subacute phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:581–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JFI, van Wijck F, Joice S, Ogston SA, Cole I, MacWalter RS. A comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper-limb task training in early poststroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1237–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Bock S, Prass K. Reduced skillfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: Does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39:687–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov ME, Lewis GN, Corcos DM. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:945–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Love ML, McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Exploiting interlimb coupling to improve paretic arm reaching performance in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86: 2131–2137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Harris-Love M, Liu W, Whitall J. Temporal coordination of the arms during bilateral simultaneous and sequential movements in patients with chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168:450–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose DK, Winstein CI. The co-ordination of bimanual rapid aiming movements following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:452–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham CL, Stoykov ME, Walter CB. Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002;110:321–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messier S, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J, Roy Y. Kinematic analysis of upper limbs and trunk movement during bilateral movement after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1463–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Winter T, Muller N, Pinkowski C, Eickhof C, Mauritz KH. Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:961–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. Stroke. 1999;30:2347–2354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Wagner JM, Dromerick AW., Edwards DE Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the Action Research Arm Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87: 1605–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Intl Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:78–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster U. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002;33: 1840–1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fess EE. Grip strength. In: Casanova JS, ed. Clinical Assessment Recommendations. Chicago, IL: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992:41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt RT, Toews JV. Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970;51:321–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werle S, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Sprott H, Herren DB. Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population. I Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34:76–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell-Krotoski J. Advances in sensibility evaluation. Hand Clin. 1991;7:527–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrsson HH, Fagergren A, Jonsson T, Westling G, Johansson RS, Forssberg H. Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an FMRI study. I Neurophysiol. 2000;83:528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsmeer JM. Power grip and precision handling. Ann Rheum Dis. 1962;21:164–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier JR. The prehensile movements of the human hand. I Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956;38–13:902–913.
   Google Scholar
• Pouydebat E, Laurin M, Gorce P, Bels V. Evolution of grasping among anthropoids. I Evol Biol. 2008;21:1732–1743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, et al. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166:126–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caimmi M, Carda S, Giovanzana C, et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther. 2008;88:652–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson TS, Bishop MD, McGuirk TE, Sethi A, Richards LG. Reliability of upper extremity kinematics while performing different tasks in individuals with stroke. I Mot Behav. 2011;43: 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the coordination of two-handed movements. I Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979;5: 229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. I Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225—S239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiello U, Bennett KM, Stelmach GE. The bilateral reach to grasp movement. Behav Brain Res. 1993;56:43–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan JR, Burstedt MK, Johansson RS. Control of fingertip forces in multidigit manipulation. I Neurophysiol. 1999;81:1706–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson RS. Sensory control of dexterous manipulation in humans. In: Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR, eds. Hand and Brain. New York: Academic; 1996:381–414.
   Google Scholar