Assessing the Suitability of Written Stroke Materials: An Evaluation of the Interrater Reliability of the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) Checklist

REFERENCES

• McKenna K, Tooth L. Client Education: A Partnership Approach for Health Practitioners. Sydney: UNSW Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna K, Tooth LR, King DB, et al. Older patients request more information: a survey of use of written patient education materials in general practice. Australas J Ageing. 2003;22:15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Mahoney PG, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Dobson R, James OF. Satisfaction with information and advice received by stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:68–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Pain H, Buckland S, McLellan L. Providing appropriate information to patients and carers following a stroke. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:794–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier MJ. Developing and evaluating printed education materials: a prescriptive model for quality. Orthop Nurs. 1993;12:39–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul S. Hospital discharge education for patients with heart failure: What really works and what is the evidence? Crit Care Nurse. 2008;28:66–82.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J. Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med. 2001;23:227–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Theis SL, Johnson IFI. Strategies for teaching patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Nurse Spec. 1995;9:100–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson A, Sandford J, Tyndall J. Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Weinman J. Providing written information for patients: psychological considerations. J R Soc Med. 1990;83:303–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divertie V. Strategies to promote medication adherence in children with asthma. Am J Matem Child Nurs. 2002;27:10–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson IL, Dodman S, Kopelman M, Fleming A. Patient information recall in a rheumatology clinic. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;18:18–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eames S, Hoffmann T, Worrall L, Read S. Delivery styles and formats for different stroke information topics: patient and carer preferences. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):e18–e23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith J, Forster A, House A, et al. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD001919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Eames S, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. The suitability of written education materials for stroke survivors and their carers. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(3):70–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. Evaluating current practice in the provision of written information to stroke patients and their carers. Intl Ther Rehabil. 2004;11(7):303–310.
   Google Scholar
• Eames S, Hoffmann T, Worrall L, Read S. Stroke patients' and carers' perception of barriers to accessing stroke information. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(2):69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Herd C, Wearing S. Written education materials for stroke patients and their carers: perspectives and practices of health professionals. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose T, Worrall L, Hickson L, Hoffmann T. Do people with aphasia want written stroke and aphasia information? A verbal survey exploring preferences for when and how to provide stroke and aphasia information. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17:79–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K. Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada CA, Hryniewicz MM, Higgs VB, Collins C, Byrd JC. Anticoagulant patient information material is written at high readability levels. Stroke. 2000;31:2966–2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan K, O'Conor F. A readability analysis of Australian stroke information. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;7:52–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKenna K, Scott J. Do written education materials that use content and design principles improve older people's knowledge? Aust Occup Therap J. 2007;54:103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Paul CL, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW. The development of a checklist of content and design characteristics for printed health education materials. Health Promot J Austr. 1997;7:153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Vahabi M, Ferris L. Improving written patient education materials: a review of the evidence. Health Educ J. 1995;54:99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Mayneaux EJ, Murphy PW, Arnold C, et al. Improving patient education for patients with low literacy skills. Am Fam Physician. 1996;53:205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doak C, Doak L, Root J, Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees C, Ford J, Sheard C. Patient information leaflets for prostate cancer: Which leaflets should healthcare professionals recommend? Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49: 263–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaphingst K, Zanfini C, Emmons K. Accessibility of web sites containing colorectal cancer information to adults with limited literacy. Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace LS, Rogers ES, Turner LW, Keenum AJ, Weiss BD. Suitability of written supplemental materials available on the Internet for nonprescription medications. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63:71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Worrall L. Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1166–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar