Supporting Autonomy for People with Aphasia: Use of the Life Interests and Values (LIV) Cards

REFERENCES

• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LPAA Group. Life participation approaches to aphasia. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am I Occup Ther. 2002;56(6):640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, McLaughlin K. An exploration of clients' goals during inpatient and outpatient stroke rehabilitiation. Intl TherRehabiL 2009;16(6):324–330.
   Google Scholar
• Berg C, LeVesser P. The preschool activity card sort. OTJR. 2006;26(4):143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young CA, Manmathan GP, Ward JC. Perceptions of goal setting in a neurological rehabilitation unit: a qualitative study of patients, carers and staff. I Rehabil Med. 2008;40(3):190–194.
   Google Scholar
• Soberg HL, Finset A, Roise O., Bautz-Holter E.. Identification and comparison of rehabilitation goals after multiple injuries: an ICF analysis of the patients', physiotherapists' and other allied professionals' reported goals. I Rehabil Med. 2008;40(5):340–346.
   Google Scholar
• Trombly CA, Radomski MV, Trexel C., Burnet-Smith SE.. Occupational therapy and achievement of self-identified goals by adults with acquired brain injury: phase II. Am I Occup Ther. 2002;56(5):489–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestner R. Reaching one's personal goals: a motivational perspective focused on autonomy. Can Psychol. 2007;49(1):60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon KM, Cooper MS. Goal striving within agentic and communal roles: separate but functionally similar pathways to enhanced well-being. I Pers. 2008;76(3):415–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GC, Frankel RM, Campbell TL, Deci EL. Research on relationship-centered care and healthcare outcomes from the Rochester biopsychosocial program: a self-determination theory integration. Fam Syst Health. 2000;18(1):79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Brady Wagner LC. Clinical ethics in the context of language and cognitive impairment: rights and protections. Semin Speech Lang. 2003;24(4):275–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(8):1035–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch EB, Butt Z, Heinemann A, et al. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. I Rehabil Med. 2008;40(7):518–523.
   Google Scholar
• Zemva N. Aphasic patients and their families: wishes and limits. Aphasiology. 1999;13(3):219–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorze GL, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology. 1995;9(3):239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natterlund BS. A new life with aphasia: everyday activities and social support. Scand I Occup Ther. 2010;17(2):117–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Kottorp A, Borg J, Tham K. Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. I Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps S, Richardson P. Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Am I Occup Ther. 2007;61 (3):328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Sherratt S, Rogers P, et al. What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology. 2011;25(3):309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L. Perspectives of quality of life by people with aphasia and their family: suggestions for successful living. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(1):14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L, Munson R. Measuring quality of life: comparing family members' and friends' ratings with those of their aphasic partners. Aphasiology. 2005;19(2):111–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Lamping DL, Smith SC, Northcott S, Lamb A, Marshall J. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):544–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Owen S, Farrelly SJ. Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2007;78(10):1072–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg A, Lonnqvist J, Palomaki H, Kaste M. Assessment of depression after stroke: a comparison of different screening instruments. Stroke. 2009;40(2):523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans R, de Witte LP, Lemmens J, van den Heuvel WI, Wade DT. Measures for rating social participation in people with aphasia: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(6):542–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Tester S, Hubbard G, Downs M, MacDonald C. Enabling frail older people with a communication difficulty to express their views: the use of Talking Mats as an interview tool. Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(2):95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley K, Jenkins K, Hadden C, Womack J, Hall J, Schweiker C. Sorting pictures to assess participation in life activities. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord. 2005 (October):11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Engell B, Hütter B-O, Willmes K, Huber W. Quality of life in aphasia: validation of a pictorial self-rating procedure. Aphasiology. 2003;17(4):383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G, Mallinson T, Crawford C, et al. Occupational Performance History Interview II (OPHI-II) Version 2.1. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Chicago Model of Human Occupation Clearinghouse; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Baum CM, Edwards D. Activity Card Sort. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers JC. The NPI interest checklist. In: Hemphill BJ, ed. Mental Health Assessment in Occupational Therapy: An Integrative Approach to the Evaluation Process. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 1988:93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N, Haley K, Womack J. A pictorial, binary-sorting system allowing "self-determination" despite aphasia. Brain Lang. 2007;103:201–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley KL, Womack J, Helm-Estabrooks N, Caignon D, McCulloch K. Life Interests and Values Cards. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2010. www.livcards.org
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Aphasia Diagnostic Profiles. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Raven J, Raven JC, Court JFI. Coloured Progressive Matrices. San Antonio, TX: Hartcourt; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ventry I, Weinstein B. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1983; 25:37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar