Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Recovery

REFERENCES

• Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50(7):120–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. I Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12(3):119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1459–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circ. 2011;123(4):e18–e209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. I Rehabil Med. 2003;(suppl 41):34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, et al. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2005;5(6):465–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engll Med. 2010;362(19):1772–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Pandyan AD, Granat M, Cameron M, Stott DJ. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke. 1999;30(7): 1384–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan T, Hui-Chan CW, Li LS. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2005;36(1):80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37(8):2115–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Abdel-Fadeil MR, Farghali A, Qaid M. Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(12):1323–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurol. 2010;75(24):2176–2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Waldner A, Mehrholz J, Tomelleri C, Pohl M, Werner C. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(9):838–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(12):1571–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George MS, Aston-Jones G. Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(1):301–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wagner CW, Frayne C, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation may improve stroke-related dysphagia: a pilot study. Stroke. 2011;42(4): 1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1229–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(11):2220–2222; author reply 2222–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(4):845–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007;72(4-6):208–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255–276.
   Google Scholar
• Bikson M, Datta A, Elwassif M. Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(6):1033–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebetanz D, Koch R, Mayenfels S, Konig F, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(6):1161–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TG, Bullara L. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990;37(10):996–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm U, Keeser D, Schiller C, et al. Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul. 2008;1(4): 386–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank E, Wilfurth S, Landgrebe M, Eichhammer P, Hajak G, Langguth B. Anodal skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2010;3(1):58–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel P, Kabisch S, Ragert P, von Kriegstein K. Contact dermatitis after transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21986238. Published October 1, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. I Neurosci. 2004;24(13):3379–3385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. I Physiol. 2000;527:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. PNAS. 2009;106(5):1590–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain. 2002;125\(pt 10):2238–2247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010;66(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette C, Sidel M, Radinska BA, Soucy JP, Thiel A. Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation modulates activation-induced regional blood flow changes during voluntary movement. I Cerebral Blood Row Metabol. 2011;31:2086–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cracco RQ, Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB. Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;74(6):417–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferbert A, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Colebatch JG, Marsden CD. Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. I Physiol. 1992;453: 525–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(3):400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch CM, Wessling M, Netz J, Seitz RJ, Homberg V. Relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1 ):4–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, Bardeleben A, Jenrich W, Kirker SG. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128 (pt 3):490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel FC, Voller B, Celnik P, et al. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2005;16(14):1551–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(9):819–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery DT, Norton JA, Roy FD, Gorassini MA. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2007;182(2):281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan S, Weber KA 2nd, Stinear JW. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation. Exp Brain Res. 2011;209(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka S, Takeda K, Otaka Y, et al. Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(6):565–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson J, Richardson JD, Baker JM, Rorden C. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke. 2011;42(3):819–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori V, Coccia M, Marinelli CV, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. I Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23(9):2309–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flöel A, Meinzer M, Kirstein R, et al. Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke. 2011;42(7):2065–2067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, et al. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(4):451–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You DS, Kim DY, Chun MH, Jung SE, Park SJ. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang. 2011;119(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon PC, Lee AH, Binns CW. Dysphagia in acute ischaemic stroke: severity, recovery and relationship to stroke subtype. I Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(7):630–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow D, Rothwell J, Hobson A, Thompson D, Hamdy S. Induction of long-term plasticity in human swallowing motor cortex following repetitive cortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(5):1044–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N, Ahmed MA, Kamel NF, Farook M, El Karn MF. Dysphagia and hemispheric stroke: a transcranial magnetic study. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008;38(4):235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N, Rothwell JC. Treatment of post-stroke dysphagia with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;119(3):155–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhagen V, Grossmann A, Benecke R, Walter U. Swallowing disturbance pattern relates to brain lesion location in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1903–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosier K, Bereznaya I. Parallel cortical networks for volitional control of swallowing in humans. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140(3):280–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasekeran V, Rothwell J, Hamdy S. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human cerebellum facilitates cortico-bulbar projections in the swallowing motor system. Neurogastroenterol Moth. 2011;23(9):831—e341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport. 2001;12(16):3553–3555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res. 2003;150(3):375–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kruse W, Kincses TZ, Hoffmann KP, Paulus W. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. I Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16(4):521–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kincses TZ, Kruse W, Hoffmann KP, Paulus W. Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(10):2888–2892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plow EB, Obretenova SN, Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A., Merabet LB.. Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(6):616–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polania R, Paulus W, Antal A, Nitsche MA. Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2287–2296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatakrishnan A, Sandrini M. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity. I Neurophysiol. 2012;107(1):1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeser D, Padberg F, Reisinger E, et al. Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage. 2011;55(2):644–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A., Fregni F.. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restorative Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(2):123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Ohn SH, Yang EJ, Park CI, Jung KJ. Enhancing motor performance by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke patients. Am I Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(10):829–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wagner CW, Frayne C, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation may improve stroke-related dysphagia: a pilot study. Stroke. 2011;42(4): 1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar