622
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of Horseback Riding Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients Post Stroke

, , &
Pages 226-232 | Published online: 05 Jan 2015

REFERENCES

  • Hattori N, Hirauama T, Katayama Y. Medical care for chronic-phase stroke in Japan. Neurol Med Chir. 2012;52(4):175–180.
  • Gurr B, Muelenz C. A follow-up study of psychological problems after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(5):461–469.
  • WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment: position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403–1409.
  • Carod-Artal FJ. Determining quality of life in stroke survivors. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):199–211.
  • Cowey E. End of life care for patients following acute stroke. Nurs Stand. 2012;26(7):42–46.
  • Castro M, Caiuby AVS, Draibe AS, Canziani MEF. Quality of life in chronic renal disease patients submitted to hemodialysis using the SF-36 health survey. AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2003;49(3):245–249.
  • Moon YS, Kim SJ, Kim HC, Won MH, Kim DH. Correlates of quality of life after stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2004;224:37–41.
  • Beinotti F, Correia N, Christofoletti G, Borges G. Use of hippotherapy in gait training for hemiparetic post-stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(6):908–913.
  • Sterba JA. Does horseback riding therapy or therapist-directed hippotherapy rehabilitate children with cerebral palsy? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:68–73.
  • Encheff JL. Kinematic Gait Analysis of Children with Neurological Impairments Pre and Post Hippotherapy [dissertation]. Toledo, OH: University of Toledo; 2008. http://gradworks.umi.com/33/46/3346574.html.
  • Lechner HE, Kakebeeke TH, Hegemann D, Baumberger M. The effect of hippotherapy on spasticity and on mental well-being of persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1241–1248.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
  • McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu IFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) III: tests of data quality scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32(1):40–66.
  • Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W., Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Brazilian-Portuguese version of the SF-36: a reliable and valid quality of life outcome measures. Rev Bras Reumatol. 1999;39(3):143–150.
  • Hamedani AG, Wells CK, Brass LM, et al. A quality-of-life instrument for young hemorrhagic stroke patients. Stroke. 2001;32:687–695.
  • Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(12):3079–3083.
  • Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33:1840–1844.
  • Hopman WM, Verner J. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2003;34:801–805.
  • Sterba JA. Does horseback riding therapy or therapist-directed hippotherapy rehabilitate children with cerebral palsy? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:68–73.
  • Marcelino JFQ, Melo ZM. Therapeutic riding: repercussion on family relations of children with prematureness development delay. Psicol Estud. 2006;23(3):279–287.
  • Frank A, McCloskey S, Dole RL. Effect of hippotherapy on perceived self-competence and participation in a child with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23(3):301–308.
  • Fraas MR. Enhancing quality of life for survivors of stroke through phenomenology. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(1):40–46.
  • Hammer A, Nilsagård Y, Forsberg A, Pepa H, Skargren E, Oberg B. Evaluation of therapeutic riding (Sweden)/hippotherapy (United States). A single-subject experimental design study replicated in eleven patients with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005;21(1):51–77.
  • Uzun ALL. Equoterapia Aplicação em Distúrbios do Equilibrio. Sao Paulo: Vetor; 2005.
  • Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.