Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes from Two Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs

REFERENCES

• Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy: Impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34:987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51;1282–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes G, Perazzolo C, Piani A, Piccione F. Intensive versus regular speech therapy in global aphasia: A controlled study. Aphasiology. 1996;10:385–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:172–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakheit AMO, Shaw S, Barrett L, et al. A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia. Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21:885–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage K, Snell C, Lambon Ralph MA. How intensive does anomia therapy for people with aphasia need to be? Neuropsychological Rehabil. 2011;21:26–41.
   Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochran Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:1–228.
   Google Scholar
• Porch BE. Porch Index of Communicative Ability. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil MR, Prescott TE. Revised Token Test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• McClung JS, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Nadeau SE. Ambient experience in restitutive treatment of aphasia. Frontiers Human Neurosci. 2010;4:1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David R, Enderby P, Bainton D. Treatment of acquired aphasia: Speech therapists and volunteers compared. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982;45:957–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C, Torney A, Gildea-Howardine E., Willmes K.. Outcome of a one-month therapy intensive for chronic aphasia: Variable individual responses. Semin Speech Lang. 2010;31:21–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JB, Kaye RC, Cherney LR. Conversational script performance in adults with non-fluent aphasia: Treatment intensity and aphasia severity. Aphasiology. 2009;23:885–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall RC, Tompkins CA, Phillips DS. Improvement in treated aphasia: Examination of selected prognostic factors. Folia phoniat. 1982;34:305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pederson P, Vinter K, Olsen T. Aphasia after stroke: Type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen Aphasia Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar ML, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke. 2010;42:1485–1488.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney L, Doyle P, Hula W, et al. Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: Philosophy, procedures and outcomes. Presented at: Annual Convention of the American Speech Language Hearing Association; 2011; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, Black S. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91:196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Holland AL, Frattali CM, Fromm DS. Communication Activities of Daily Living-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S, Elbard H, Finlayson A, Zoghaib C. The Communicative Effectiveness Index development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1989; 54:113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz R, Wertz R. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:493–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman R, Bernstein-Ellis E. The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;42:411–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks R, Holland A. Melodic intonation therapy. J Speech Hear Disord. 1976; 41:287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N, Fitzpatrick P, Barresi B. Visual action therapy for global aphasia. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982;44:385–389.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson PM, Hirsch FM, Rewega MA. Successful single word writing treatment. Experimental analyses of four cases. Aphasiology. 2002;16: 473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Incorporating parameters of natural conversation in aphasia treatment. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Stragegies in Adult Aphasia.. Baltimore: Williams & VVilkins; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology. 1992;6:337–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. The Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Boston, MA: Veteran's Administration; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• La Pointe L, Horner J. Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia. Beaverton, OR: C.C. Publications Inc; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• German D. Test of Adolescent/Adult Word Finding. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Paul-Brown D, Frattali CM, Holland AL, Thompson CK, Caperton Cl. Quality of Communication Life Scales. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language Hearing Association; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lear J, Sperry D. Self-assessment of communication skills. Ontario, Canada; 1997. (Unpublished assessment available from the authors.)
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Babbitt EM, Semik P, Heinemann AW. Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 1. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Cherney LR. Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 2. Aphasiology. 2011;25: 727–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Victor JC, et al. Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA). Toronto, Canada: Aphasia Institute; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle DJ, Mikolic J, Prieto L, et al. The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57: 997–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW. Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders. A critical review. J Commun Disord. 2004; 37: 217–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frattali C, Thompson CK, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language Hearing Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar