149
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Development of a Self-Report Scale of Spasticity

, , &
Pages 485-492 | Published online: 05 Jan 2015

REFERENCES

  • Lance JW. What is spasticity. Lancet. 1994;1:606.
  • Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer A-K. Spasticity after stroke: An overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments [review]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:814–820.
  • Bhimani RH, Anderson LC, Henly SJ, Stoddard SA. Clinical measurement of limb spasticity in adults: State of the science. J Neurosci Nurs. 2011;43: 104–115.
  • Naghdi S, Ebrahimi I, Asgari A, et al. A preliminary study into the criterion validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale using the new measure of the alpha motoneuron excitability in spastic hemiplegia. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;47:187–192.
  • Fleuren JF, Voerman GE, Erren-Wolters CV, et al. Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:46–52.
  • Hobart JC, Riazi A, Thompson AJ, et al. Getting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: The Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88). Brain. 2006;129:224–234.
  • Anwar K, Barnes MR A pilot study of a comparison between a patient scored numeric rating scale and clinician scored measures of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(4): 333–340.
  • Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989:70:308–312.
  • Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:47–48.
  • Farrar JT, Troxel AB, Stott C, Duncombe P, Jensen MP. Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0-10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: A post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2008;30(5):974–985.
  • Barker S, Kent RM, Tennant A. Quality of life after stroke: The development of a needs based quality of life scale, the stroke-QoL. Clin Rehabil. 2007;22:667.
  • Creswell, J. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
  • Geddes J, Fear J, Pickering A, Tennant A, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA. Epidemiology of stroke in Northern England. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1996;50:140–143.
  • Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
  • Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18.
  • Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–1362.
  • Luce RD, Tukey JW. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. J Math Psychol. 1964;1:1–27.
  • van Newby A, Conner GR, Bunderson CV. The Rasch model and additive conjoint measurement. J Appl Measure. 2009;10:348–354.
  • Andrich D, Sheridan BED, Luo G. RUMM2030: Rasch Unidimensional Models for Measurement. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2009.
  • Smith EV. Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Measure. 2002;3:205–231.
  • Mahoney Fl, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
  • Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. A postal version of the Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil. 1994 8: 233–239.
  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.
  • Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind R Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(8):862–869.
  • Okonkwo OC, Roth DL, Pulley L, Howard G. Confirmatory factor analysis of the validity of the SF-12 for persons with and without a history of stroke. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(9):1323–1331.
  • Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: The London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care. 1994;3(1):11–6.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICE). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: Author; 1980.
  • Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: Validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(7):825–829.
  • Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measure Trans. 1994;7(4):328–331.
  • US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Rockville, MD: FDA; 2009.
  • Rasch G. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In: Neyman J, ed. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. IV (pp 321–334). Berkeley: University of California Press; 1961.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.