Structure Materials in Fusion Reactors: Issues Related to Tritium, Radioactivity and Radiation-Induced Effects

References

• G. FEDERICI et al., “Plasma-Material Interactions in Current Tokamaks and their Implications for Next Step Fusion Reactors”, Nucl. Fusion 41 (2001) 1967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. O. HOFER and J. ROTH (Eds), Physical Processes of the Interaction of Fusion Plasmas with Solids, Academic Press, New York (1996).
   Google Scholar
• A. LOARTE, “Implications of the Use of Carbon- Based Plasma Facing Components in Next Step Fusion Devices”, Phys. Scr. T111 (2004) 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. LINKE, “Plasma Facing Materials and Components Future Fusion Devices: Development, Characterisation and Performance under Fusion Specific Loading Conditions”, Phys. Scr. T123 (2006) 45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Progress in the ITER Physics Basis, Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007), (also: www.iter.org).
   Google Scholar
• N. HOLTKAMP, “The Status of the ITER Design”, Fusion Eng. Des 84 (2009) 98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. SAMM, “Plasma - Wall Interaction”, These proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• A. KIRSCHNER, “Erosion and Deposition Mechanisms in Fusion Plasmas”, These proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• G. F. MATTHEWS et al. “Overview of the ITER-Like Wall Project”, Phys. Scr. T128 (2007) 137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.F. MATTHEWS et al., “Current Status of the JET ITER-Like Wall Project”, Phys. Scr. T138 (2009) 014030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.F. MATTHEWS et al., “The JET ITER-Like Wall - Status and Experimental programme”, Phys. Scr. T145 (2011) 014001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ph. MERTENS, “Detailed Design of a Solid Tungsten Divertor at JET”, Phys. Scr. T145 (2011) 014002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. E. BLOOM, “The Challenge of Developing Structural Materials for Fusion Power Systems”, J. Nucl. Mater. 258-263 (1998) 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. YANO et al, “Physical Property Change of Neutron Irradiated CVD-diamond, Silicon and Silicon Carbide”, J. Nucl. Mater. 307-311 (2002) 1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. DECRÉTON, T. SHIKAMA and E. HODGSON, “Performance of Functional Materials and Components in a Fusion Reactor: the Issue of Radiation Effects in Ceramics and Glass Materials for Diagnostics”, J. Nucl. Mater. 329-333 (2004) 125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. COAD et al., “The Amount and Distribution of Deuterium Retained in the JET Divertor after the C and Be Phases”, J. Nucl. Mater. 241-243 (1997) 408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RUBEL et al., “Beryllium and Carbon Films in JET following D-T Operation”, J. Nucl. Mater. 313-316 (2003) 323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. EMMOTH, M. RUBEL and E. FRANCONI, “Deep Penetration of Deuterium in Carbon-Based Substrates”, Nucl. Fusion 30 (1990) 1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. K. ALIMOV and J. ROTH, “Hydrogen isotope retention in plasma-facing materials: review of recent experimental results”, Phys. Scr. T128 (2007) 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. KRETER et al., “Deuterium Retention in Different Carbon Materials Exposed at TEXTOR”, J. Physics Conf. Series 100 (2008) 062024.
   Google Scholar
• V. PHILIPPS et al., “Erosion and Re-deposition of Wall Material in Controlled Fusion Devices”, Vacuum 67 (2002) 399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. VON KEUDELL et al., “Surface Loss Probabilities of Hydrocarbon Radicals on Amorphous Hydrogenated Carbon Film Surfaces”, Nucl. Fusion 39 (1999) 1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RUBEL et al., “Analysis and Oxidation of Thick Deposits on TEXTOR Plasma Facing Components”, J. Nucl. Mater. 266-269 (1999) 1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. SKINNER et al., “Plasma Wall Interaction and Tritium Retention in TFTR”, J. Nucl. Mater. 241-243 (1997) 214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. LANDKAMMER et al., “Erosion of Thin Hydrogenated Carbon Films in Oxygen, Oxygen/Hydrogen and Water Plasmas”, J. Nucl. Mater. 264 (1999) 48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. H. SKINNER et al., “Thermal Response of Tritiated Co-deposits from JET and TFTR to Transient Heat Pulses”, Phys. Scr. T103 (2003) 34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. IVANOVA et al., “Laser-based and Thermal Methods for Fuel Removal and Cleaning of PlasmaFacing Components”, J. Nucl. Mater. (2011) in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. STORK (Ed.), Technical Aspects of Deuterium- Tritium Operation at JET, (special issue) Fusion Eng. Des. 47 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• M. RUBEL et al., “Fuel Removal from Plasma-Facing Components by Oxidation-Assisted Technique. An Overview of surface morphology after oxidation”, J. Nucl. Mater. 363-365 (2007) 877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. WIDDOWSON et al., “Efficacy of photon cleaning of JET divertor tiles” J. Nucl. Mater. 363-365 (2007) 341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RUBEL et al., “Thick Co-Deposits and Dust in Controlled Fusion Devices with Carbon Walls: Fuel Inventory and Growth Rate of Co-Deposited Layers”, Phys. Scr. T103 (2003) 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RUBEL et al., “Dust Particles in Controlled Fusion Devices”, Nucl. Fusion 41 (2001) 1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. WINTER and G. GEBAUER, “Dust in Magnetic Confinement Devices and its Impact on Plasma Operation”, J. Nucl. Mater. 266-269 (1999) 228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. ROHDE et al., “Dust Investigations at ASDEX Upgrade” Phys. Scr. T138 (2009) 014024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. IVANOVA et al., “Survey of Dust Formed in the TEXTOR Tokamak: Structure and Fuel Retention”, Phys. Scr. T138 (2009) 014025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. COUNSELL and C.H. WU, “In-situ Detection and Removal of Carbon Debris - a Challenge for the Next Step Fusion Device”, Phys. Scr. T91 (2001) 70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RUBEL et al., “Overview of Co-deposition and Fuel Inventory in Castellated Divertor Structures at JET”, J. Nucl. Mater. 367-370 (2007) 1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. COUNSELL et al., “Tritium Retention in Next Step Devices and Requirement for Mitigation and Tritium Removal Techniques”, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 48 (2006) B189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. JOHNSON and A. N. ORLOV (Eds), Physics of Radiation Effects in Crystals, Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences, Vol. 13, Noth-Holland, Amsterdam (1986).
   Google Scholar
• H. ULLMAIER, Contributions to High-Temperature Plasma Physics, K. H. SPATSCHEK and J. ULENBUSCH (Eds), Chap. 3, p. 201, Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1994).
   Google Scholar
• H. S. PLENDL (Ed.), Nuclear Transmutation Methods and Technologies, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1998. (also : www.chemistrycoach.com/nuclearchem.htm)
   Google Scholar
• T. D. BURCHELL, “Radiation Damage in Carbon- Carbon Composites”, Phys. Scr. T64 (1996) 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-8), Sendai, Japan, October, 1997, J. Nucl. Mater. 258-263 (1998), Section 7, pp. 1798–1919.
   Google Scholar
• L. GIANCARLI et al., “Breeding Blanket Modules Testing in ITER: An International Programme on the Way to DEMO”, Fusion Eng. Des. 81 (2006) 393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. POITEVIN et al., “The Test Blanket Modules Project in Europe”, Fusion Eng. Des. 82 (2007) 2164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. R. RAFFRAY et al., “Breeding Blanket Concepts for Fusion and Material Requirements”, J. Nucl. Mater. 307-311 (2002) 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. L. ANDERSON and P. LaMARCHE, “Tritium Activities in the United States”, Fusion Technol. 28 (1995) 479.
   Google Scholar
• D.K. MURDOCH et al., “ITER Fuel Cycle Development”, Fusion Sci. Technol., 48 (2005) 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. ROLFE, “Remote handling on fusion experiments”, Fusion Eng. Des. 36 (1997) 91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MÖSLANG et al., “Suitability and Feasibility of the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) for Fusion Materials Studies”, Nucl. Fusion 40 (2000) 619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proc. Int. Conf. on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM), J. Nucl. Mater, 133-134 (1985), 141-143 (1986), 155-157 (1988), 179-181 (1991), 212-215 (1994), 258-263 (1998), 283-287 (2000), 307-311 (2002), 329-333 (2004), 367-370 (2007), 386-399 (2009), 417 (2011).
   Google Scholar