Cost Assessment of a Generic Magnetic Fusion Reactor

REFERENCES

• W. METZ, “Fusion Energy: Still an Elusive Target,” High Technology, p. 52 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• R. CARRUTHERS, “Fusion Dilemma,” Interdisciplinary Sci. Rev. (GB), 6, 127 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. M. LIDSKY, “The Trouble with Fusion,” MIT Technical Rev., 86, 33 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• D. PFIRSCH and K. H. SCHMITTER, “Some Initial Observations on the Prospects of Fusion Power,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Energy Options — The Role of Alternatives in the World Energy Scene, London, April 3–6, 1984, IEE Conference Publication No. 233, Institute of Electrical Engineers (1984).
   Google Scholar
• “STARFIRE,” ANL/FPP-80, Argonne National Laboratory (1980).
   Google Scholar
• B. BADGER et al., “NU WM AK,” UWFDM-330, University of Wisconsin (1979).
   Google Scholar
• “MARS, Mirror Advanced Reactor Studies,” UCRL-53333, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1983).
   Google Scholar
• “EBT-R Conceptual Design Study,” LA-8882-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1981).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. HAGENSON et al., “The RFPR Concept,” LA-7973-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1979).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. MILLER et al., “A Modular Stellarator Reactor,” LA-9737-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1983).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Energy Cost Data Base,” DOE/NE-0044, U.S. Department of Energy (1982 and 1983 Update).
   Google Scholar
• M. A. ABDOU et al., “ANL Parametric System Studies,” ANL/FPP/TM-100, Argonne National Laboratory (1977).
   Google Scholar
• K. EVANS et al., “Tokamak Reactor Cost Model,” ANL/FPP/TM-168, Argonne National Laboratory (1983).
   Google Scholar
• R. F. BOURQUE, “Parametric Requirements for Non-Circular Tokamak Commercial Fusion Plant,” GA-A 14876, General Atomic Company (1978).
   Google Scholar
• W. R. SPEARS and J. A. WESSON, “Scaling of Tokamak Reactor Costs,” Nucl. Fusion, 20, 1525 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. I. H. COOKE, Proc. 10th Symp. Fusion Engineering, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, December 5–9, 1983, Vol. 2, p. 1839, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• J. SHEFFIELD, “Physics Requirements for an Attractive Magnetic Fusion Reactor” (accepted for publication in Nucl. Fusion).
   Google Scholar
• D. DeFREECE, “Fusion Reactor First Wall/Blanket Systems Analysis,” Final Report, ER-591, Electric Power Research Institute (1978).
   Google Scholar
• M. A. ABDOU, “Tritium Breeding in Fusion Reactors,” ANL/FPP/TM-165, Argonne National Laboratory (1982).
   Google Scholar
• M. A. ABDOU et al., “Blanket Comparison and Selection Study,” ANL/FPP-83-1, Argonne National Laboratory (1983).
   Google Scholar
• “First International Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-1),” Tokyo, 1984, J. Nucl. Mater., North Holland, Amsterdam (1985).
   Google Scholar
• M. A. ABDOU and Z. EL-DERINI, “A Comparative Study of the Performance and Economics of Advanced and Convention Structural Materials in Fusion Systems,” J. Nucl. Mater., 85 & 86, 57 (1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. E. GOLD et al., “Materials Technology for Fusion: Current Status and Future Requirements,” Nucl. Technol./Fusion, 1, 169 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. G. LOGAN, “A Rationale for Fusion Economics Based on Inherent Safety,” UCRL-91761, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (submitted to the J. Fusion Energy).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. MILLER et al., “Parametric Systems Analysis of the Modular Stellarator Reactor,” LA-9344-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1982).
   Google Scholar
• “A Demonstration Tokamak Power Plant Study, DEMO,” ANL/FPP/82-1, p. 2, Argonne National Laboratory (1982).
   Google Scholar
• M. S. CHANCE et al., “Ballooning Mode Stability of Bean-Shaped Cross Sections for High-β Tokamak Plasmas,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 51, 1963 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. A. CARRERAS et al., “Equilibrium and Stability Properties of High-Beta Torsatrons,” Phys. Fluids, 26, 3569 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. K. BEVIR and J. W. GRAY, “Relaxation, Flux Consumption and Quasi Steady State Pinches,” LA-8944-C, p. 176, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1981).
   Google Scholar
• C. L. HEDRICK et al., Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, London, September 12–19, 1984, IAEA-CN-44, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1985).
   Google Scholar
• R. S. DEVOTO et al., “A Small Octopole Stabilized Tandem Mirror Reactor,” UCID-20157, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1984).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. POST et al., “Models for Poloidal Divertors,” J. Nucl. Mater., 111 & 112, 383 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. PETRAVIC et al., “Recent Progress in Tokamak Edge Modeling,” J. Nucl. Mater., 128 & 129, 91 and 111 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. LUBELL, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Private Communication (1983).
   Google Scholar
• S. S. KALSI and R. J. HOOPER, “Superconducting Toroidal Field Coil Current Densities for the TFCX,” ORNL/FEDC-84/11, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1985).
   Google Scholar
• S. C. SCHULTE et al., “Fusion Reactor Design Studies — Standard Accounts for Cost Estimates,” PNL-2648, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1978).
   Google Scholar
• S. C. SCHULTE et al., “Fusion Reactor Studies–Standard Unit Costs and Cost Scaling Rules,” PNL-2987, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1979).
   Google Scholar
• M. L. MYERS et al., “Nonfuel Operations and Maintenance Costs for Large Steam-Electric Power Plants,” ORNL/TM-8324, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1982).
   Google Scholar
• G. R. SMOLEN et al., “Regional Projections of Nuclear and Fossil Electric Power Generation Costs,” ORNL/TM-8958, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1983).
   Google Scholar
• “Business Conditions Digest,” Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce (Sep. 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Z. MUSICKI and C. W. MAYNARD, “The Availability Analysis of Fusion Power Plants as Applied to MARS,” Nucl. Technol./Fusion, 4, Part 2, 284 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. TROYON et al., “MHD Limits to Plasma Confinement,” Plasma Phys. Controlled Nucl. Fusion, 26, 209 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. E. SIEMON et al., “Theoretical Studies of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) and Experimental Study of the FRC During Translation,” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, London, September 12–19, 1984, paper IAEA-CN-44/D-III-2, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1985).
   Google Scholar
• J. T. SLOUGH et al., “Flux and Particle Life-Time Measurements in Field-Reversed Configurations,” Nucl. Fusion, 24, 1537 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. J. PERKINS et al., “Plasma Engineering for MINIMARS: A Small Commercial Tandem Mirror Reactor with Octopole Physics,” UCRL-92023, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1985).
   Google Scholar
• F. L. HINTON and R. D. HAZELTINE, “Theory of Plasma Transport in Toroidal Confinement Systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 48, 239 (1976).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. E. WAGNER, “Possibility of Achieving Ignition in a High-Field Ohmically Heated Tokamak,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, 654 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. BROMBERG et al., “Commercial Tokamak Reactors with Resistive Toroidal Field Magnets,” Nucl. Fusion/Technol., 6, 597 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. HAGENSON and R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “Compact Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor,” LA-9389-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1982).
   Google Scholar
• D. STEINER et al., “ORNL Fusion Power Demonstration Study: Interim Report,” ORNL/TM-5813, p. 111, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1977).
   Google Scholar
• M. M. ELWAKIL, Nuclear Energy Conversion, Intext Educational Publishers (1971).
   Google Scholar
• M. MYERS, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Private Communication (1984).
   Google Scholar
• K. EVANS et al., “Wildcat: A Catalyzed D-D Tokamak Reactor,” ANL/FPP/TM-150, Argonne National Laboratory (1981);
   Google Scholar
  see also R. L. HAGENSON and R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “An Advanced Fuel Reversed-Field Pinch Reactor,” LA-9139-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1982).
   Google Scholar
• R. H. WHITLEY, “Advanced Commercial Tokamak Optimization Studies,” Fusion Technol., 8, 741 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• C. BRAUN, “Economics of Small Reactors,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 46, 593 (1984);
   Google Scholar
  see also C. BRAUN, “Further Analysis of the Economics of Small Reactors,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 47, 343 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• G. R. SMOLEN and J. G. DELENE, “Power Generation Costs for Alternate Reactor Fuel Cycles,” ORNL/TM-7376, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1980).
   Google Scholar
• J. G. DELENE, “An Economic Analysis of Fusion Breeders,” Proc. 6th Topl. Mtg. Fusion Energy, San Francisco, California, March 1985.
   Google Scholar
• C. E. MAX, “Uranium Resources and Their Implications for Fission Breeder and Fusion Hybrid Development,” UCRL-90820, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1984).
   Google Scholar
• B. K. JENSEN et al., “Utility Evaluation of Fusion-Fission Hybrids,” Nucl. Technol./Fusion, 5, 224 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Systems Studies on the Extraction of Uranium from Seawater,” DOE/TIC/EG-82/205, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1982).
   Google Scholar
• “Component Failures at Pressurized Water Reactors,” ALO-74, Combustion Engineering, Inc. (1980);
   Google Scholar
  see also Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 184, 21 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• “Power Plant Productivity Improvement Study,” HCP/B60830, U.S. Department of Energy (1978).
   Google Scholar
• “Modification and Simplification of the DOE/MRI Methodology,” Trident Engineering Associates Inc., ORNL/Sub-7435, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1981).
   Google Scholar
• D. C. PHUNG, ORAU/EA-78-7, Oak Ridge Associated Universities (1978).
   Google Scholar