Simplified Fusion Power Plant Costing: A General Prognosis and Call for “New Think”

References

• J. C. CORDEY, R. J. GOLDSTON, and R. J. PARKER, Phys. Today, 45, 1, 22 (Jan. 1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. I. THOMASSEN, R. J. GOLDSTON, and G. H. NEILSON, “A Programmatic Framework for the Tokamak Physics Experiment (TPX),” J. Fusion Energy, 12, 3, 215 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. DOGGETT et al., “ITER Tokamak Device,” ITER Documentation Series, No. 25, International Atomic Energy Agency (1991).
   Google Scholar
• ARIES TEAM, “The ARlES-1 Tokamak Reactor Study Final Report,” UCLA-PPG-1323, University of California-Los Angeles (1991).
   Google Scholar
• ARIES TEAM, “The AR1ES-II1 Tokamak Reactor Study Final Report,” UCLA-PPG-1384, University of California-Los Angeles, to be published (1995).
   Google Scholar
• ARIES TEAM, “The AR1ES-II and ARIES-IV Tokamak Reactor Study Final Report,” UCLA-PPG-1461, University of California-Los Angeles, to be published (1995).
   Google Scholar
• R. A. KRAKOWSKI, C. G. BATHKE, R. L. MILLER, and K. A. WERLEY, “Lessons Learned from the Tokamak Advanced Reactor Innovations and Evaluation Study (ARIES),” LA-UR-93-4217, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Dec. 1993);
   Google Scholar
  see also Proc. 11th Topl. Mtg. on Technology of Fusion Energy, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 19–23, 1994, Fusion Technol., 26, 1111 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. CONN, F. NAJMABADI, S. SHARAFAT, K. R. SCHULTZ, and R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “The Requirements of a Fusion Demonstration Reactor and the STARL1TE Study,” UCLA-PPG-1394, University of California-Los Angeles (Feb. 1992).
   Google Scholar
• L. BROMBERG, R. A. KRAKOWSKI, E. T. CHENG, D. R. COHN, C. G. BATHKE, and R. LECLAIRE, “Commercial Reactors with Resistive Magnets,” Proc. 14th Symp. Fusion Engineering, San Diego, California, September 30–October 3, 1991, Vol. 2, p. 1016, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. KRAKOWSKI, R. L. MILLER, and C. G. BATHKE, “A Cost-Based Systems Analysis of Long-Pulsed versus Steady-State Tokamak Reactors,” Proc. 14th Symp. Fusion Engineering, San Diego, California, September 30-October 3, 1991, Vol. 2, p. 1119, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• J. SHEFFIELD, R. A. DORY, S. M. COHN, J. G. DELENE, L. PARSLY, D. E. T. F. ASHBY, and W. T. REIERSEN, “Cost Assessment of a Generic Magnetic Fusion Reactor,” Fusion Technol., 9, 199 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. HOLDREN et al., “Report of the Senior Committee on Environmental, Safety, and Economic Aspects of Magnetic Fusion Energy,” UCRL-53766, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Sep. 1989).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. HAGENSON et al., “Compact Reversed-Field Pinch Reactors (CRFPR): Preliminary Engineering Considerations,” LA-10200-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Aug. 1984).
   Google Scholar
• F. NAJMABADI et al., “The TITAN Reversed-Field-Pinch Fusion Reactor Study,” UCLA-PPG-1200, University of California-Los Angeles (1990).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. HAGENSON and R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “The Spheromak as a Compact Fusion Reactor,” LA-10908-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Mar. 1987).
   Google Scholar
• G. GRIEGER et al., “Modular Stellarator Reactors and Plans for Wendelstein 7-X,” Fusion Technol., 21, 1767 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. MILLER, “Advanced Stellarator Power Plants,” Proc. 11th Topi. Mtg. Technology of Fusion Energy, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 19–23, 1994, Fusion Technol., 26, 1127 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• S. W. HANEY et al., “A ‘SuperCode’ for Systems Analysis of Tokamak Experiments and Reactors,” Fusion Technol., 21, 1749 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. G. BATHKE, R. A. KRAKOWSKI, and R. L. MILLER, “A Need for Non-Tokamak Approaches to Magnetic Fusion Energy,” Proc. 17th Symp. Fusion Technology, Rome, Italy, September 14–18, 1992, Vol. 2, p. 1663, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “Progress in Commercial Magnetic Fusion Energy Reactor Designs,” Fusion Technol., 20, 121 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Guide for the Economic Evaluation of Nuclear Plant Designs,” NUS-531, Nuclear Utilities Services (Jan. 1963).
   Google Scholar
• J. G. DELENE and C. R. HUDSON II, “Cost Estimate Guidelines for Advanced Nuclear Power Technologies,” ORNL/TM-10071/R3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1993).
   Google Scholar
• J. G. DELENE, K. A. WILLIAMS, and B. H. SHAPIRO, “Nuclear Energy Cost Data Base,” DOE/NE-0095, U.S. Department of Energy (Sep. 1988).
   Google Scholar
• L. J. PERKINS, D. E. BALDWIN, J. H. HAMMER, C. W. HARTMAN, D. L. MORGAN, S. W. HANEY, and J. L. EDDLEMAN, “Novel Thermonuclear and Non-Thermonuclear Fusion: Concepts and Reactor Potential,” presented at 11th Topi. Mtg. Technology of Fusion Energy, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 19–23, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• C. G. BATHKE, “A Systems Analysis of the ARIES Tokamak Reactors,” Proc. 17th Symp. Fusion Technology, Rome, Italy, September 14–18, 1992, Vol. 2, p. 1658, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• R. L. MILLER, W. R. SPEARS, R. HANCOX, and R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “Comparison of EURATOM and U.S. Estimates of Fusion Reactor Costs,” Fusion Technol., 19, 813 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• J. G. DELENE, “Updated Comparison of Economics of Fusion Reactors with Advanced Fission Reactors,” Fusion Technol., 19, 807 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, “1000-MWe Central Station Power Plants Investment Cost Study,” WASH-1230, United States Atomic Energy Commission (June 1972).
   Google Scholar
• G. PAUSE, “Economic Evaluation of MHTGR-GT,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 69, 342 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• C. G. BATHKE and ARIES TEAM, “A Comparison of Steady-State ARIES and Pulsed PULSAR Tokamak Power Plants,” Proc. 11th Topi. Mtg. Technology of Fusion Energy, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 19–23, 1994, Fusion Technol., 26, 1163 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• R. A. KRAKOWSKI, “Low-Aspect-Ratio Fusion Power Plants,” presented at workshop on Establishing the Physics Basis Needed to Access the Potential of Compact Toroidal Reactors, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, July 19–22, 1994, Fusion Technol., to be published.
   Google Scholar
• Y.-K. M. PENG and D. J. STRICKLER, “Features of Spherical Torus Plasmas,” Nucl. Fusion, 26, 769 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. JARDIN, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Personal Communication (1994).
   Google Scholar
• J. SHEFFIELD, “The Physics of Magnetic Fusion Reactors,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 66, 3, 1015 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. W. BUSSARD, “Some Physics Considerations of Magnetic Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement: A New Concept for Spherical Converging-Flow Fusion,” Fusion Technol., 19, 273 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Report of the 1992 EPRI Fusion Panel,” EPRI-TR-101849, Electric Power Research Institute (Nov. 1992).
   Google Scholar
• R. J. GOLDSON, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Personal Communication (1994).
   Google Scholar