Perturbation Theory for Lattice Cell Calculations

References

• J. R. ASKEW, “Review of the Status of Collision Probability Methods,” Seminar on Numerical Reactor Calculations, p. 185, International Atomic Energy Agency (1972).
   Google Scholar
• B. DAVISON, Neutron Transport Theory, Oxford University Press, London (1957).
   Google Scholar
• G. C. POMRANING, “Variational Principle for Eigenvalue Equations,” J. Math. Phys., 8, 149 (1967).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. GANDINI, “A Generalized Perturbation Method for Bi-linear Functionals of the Real and Adjoint Fluxes,” J. Nucl. Energy, 21, 755 (1967).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. ROZON, A. HEBERT, and D. McNABB, “The Application of Generalized Perturbation Theory and Mathematical Programming to Equilibrium Refueling Studies of a CANDU Reactor,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 78, 211 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. OBLOW, “Sensitivity Theory from a Differential Viewpoint,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 59, 187 (1976).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. R. COVEYOU, V. R. CAIN, and K. J. YOST, “Adjoint and Importance in Monte Carlo Applications,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 27, 219 (1967).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. WILLIAMS, “Perturbation Theory for Reactor Analysis,” CRC Handbook of Nuclear Reactors Calculations, Vol. 3, p. 63, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1986).
   Google Scholar
• I. LUX and L. KOBLINGER, Monte Carlo Particle Transport Methods: Neutron and Photons Calculations, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1991).
   Google Scholar
• B. L. BROADHEAD, C. M. HOPPER, R. L. CHILDS, and C. V. PARKS, Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Applied to Criticality Safety Validation, NUREG/CR-6655, Vol. 1, ORNL/TM-13692/V1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1999).
   Google Scholar
• A. BLANCO, C. J. GHO, F. R. ANDRADE LIMA, and A. GANDINI, “Higher Order HGPT Methodology Applications for BNCT Dosimetry Related Sensitivity Analysis,” Proc. Int. Topl. Conf. Advances in Reactor Physics and Mathematics and Computation into the Next Millenium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 7-12, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, Variational Methods in Nuclear Reactor Physics, Academic Press, New York (1974).
   Google Scholar
• T. COURAU and G. MARLEAU, “Calculating Adjoint Fluxes in the Code DRAGON Using the Collision Probability Method,” Proc. Int. Topl. Conf. Advances in Reactor Physics and Mathematics and Computation into the Next Millenium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 7-12, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• T. COURAU and G. MARLEAU, “Adjoint and Generalized Adjoint Flux Calculations Using the Collision Probability Technique,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 141, 46 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. COURAU and G. MARLEAU, “Generalized Perturbation Theory in DRAGON: Application to CANDU Cell Calculations,” Proc. 22nd Annual CNS Conf., Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2001).
   Google Scholar
• T. COURAU and G. MARLEAU, “Generalized Perturbation Theory in DRAGON: Application to PWR Assembly Calculations,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Mathematical Methods for Nuclear Applications, Salt Lake City, Utah, September, 2001, American Nuclear Society (2001).
   Google Scholar
• E. E. LEWIS and W. F. MILLER, Jr., Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1984).
   Google Scholar
• R. ROY, “Anisotropic Scattering for Integral Transport Codes. Part 2. Cyclic Tracking and its Application to XY Lattices,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 18, 511 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. TAKAHASHI, “Approximation for the Calculation of the Generalized First-Flight Collision Probability,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 26, 254 (1966).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. E. MACFARLANE, “TRANSX-2: ACode for Interfacing MATXS Cross-Section Libraries to Nuclear Transport Codes,” LA-12312-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1993).
   Google Scholar
• A. HÉBERT, G. MARLEAU, and R. ROY, “Application of the Lattice Code DRAGON to CANDU Analysis,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 72, 335 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• J. V. DONNELLY, “WIMS-CRNL: A User’s Manual for the Chalk River Version of WIMS,” AECL-8955, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (1986).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, Jr., “Variational Estimates of Reactivity Worths and Reaction Rates Ratios in Critical Nuclear Reactors”. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 48, 444 (1972).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. WILLIAMS, B. L. BROADHEAD, and C. V. PARKS, “Eigenvalue Sensitivity Theory for Resonance-Shielded Cross Sections,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 138, 177 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. BEVINGTON, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1969).
   Google Scholar
• M. S. MILGRAM, “Diffusion Coefficient for a Voided Annulus: The Trouble with COPRAN 1. The Self-Collision Probability,” Proc. Joint Int. Conf. Mathematical Methods and Supercomputing for Nuclear Applications, Saratoga Springs, New York, October 5-9, 1997, American Nuclear Society (1997).
   Google Scholar
• D. ROZON and W. SHEN, “A Parametric Study of the DUPIC Fuel Cycle to Reflect Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Management Strategy,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 138, 1 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• I. PETROVIC and P. BENOIST, “BN Theory: Advances and New Model for Neutron Leakage Calculation,” Adv. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 24 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• R. ROY, G. MARLEAU, J. TAJMOUATI, and D. ROZON, “Modelling of CANDU Reactivity Control Devices with the Lattice Code DRAGON,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 21, 115 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar