Convergence Analysis of the Nonlinear Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference Method for One-Dimensional Fixed-Source Neutron Diffusion Problem

REFERENCES

• K. S. SMITH, “Nodal Method Storage Reduction by Nonlinear Iteration,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 44, 265 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• J. M. ARAGONÉS and C. AHNERT, “A Linear Discontinuous Finite Difference Formulation for Synthetic Coarse-Mesh Few-Group Diffusion Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 94, 309 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. ENGRAND, G. I. MALDONADO, R. AL-CHALABI, and P. J. TURINSKY, “Nonlinear Iteration Strategy for NEM Refinement and Extension,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 65, 221 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• H. G. JOO, D. A. BARBER, G. JIANG, and T. J. DOWNAR, “PARCS: A Multi-Dimensional Two-Group Reactor Kinetics Code Based on the Nonlinear Analytic Nodal Method,” PU/NE-98-26, Purdue University (1998).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. MOON, N. Z. CHO, J. M. NOH, and S. G. HONG, “Acceleration of the Analytic Function Expansion Nodal Method by Two-Factor Two-Node Nonlinear Iteration,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 132, 194 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. C. SHIN, Y. H. KIM, and Y. B. KIM, “One-Node Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference Algorithm for Fine-Mesh Finite Difference Operator,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 81, 150 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Y A. CHAO, “A Theoretical Analysis of the Coarse Mesh Finite Difference Representation in Advanced Nodal Method,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Mathematics and Computation, Reactor Physics and Environmental Analysis in Nuclear Application (M&C’99), Vol. 1, p. 117, Madrid, Spain, September 27–30, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Y. A. CHAO, “Coarse Mesh Finite Difference Methods and Applications,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Advances in Reactor Physics and Mathematics and Computation into the Next Millenium (PHYSOR 2000), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 7–12, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• N. GARCIA-HERRANZ, O. CABELLOS, J. M. ARAGONÉS, and C. AHNERT, “Performance of the Analytic Coarse Mesh Finite Difference Method With Heterogeneous Nodes,” Proc. Reactor Physics Topl. Mtg. (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7–10, 2002, American Nuclear Society (2002).
   Google Scholar
• H. G. JOO et al., “One-Node Solution Based Nonlinear Analytic Nodal Method,” Proc. KNS Spring Mtg., Korean Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• C. LEE and T. J. DOWNAR, “Nonlinear Formulation for Multigroup Simplified P3”, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 83, 297 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH and J. D. RHODES III, “Full-Core, 2-D, LWR Core Calculations with CASMO-4E,” Proc. ANS Reactor Physics Topl. Mtg. (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7–10, 2002, American Nuclear Society (2002).
   Google Scholar
• H. G. JOO, J. Y. CHO, H. Y KIM, S. Q. ZEE, and M. H. CHANG, “Dynamic Implementation of the Equivalence Theory in the Heterogeneous Whole Core Transport Calculation,” Proc. Reactor Physics Topl. Mtg. (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7–10, 2002, American Nuclear Society (2002).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH, “Spatial Homogenization Methods for Light Water Reactors,” PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Engineering (1980).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH, “Assembly Homogenization Techniques for Light Water Reactor Analysis,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 17, 303 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. J. DOWNAR et al., “PARCS: Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator,” Proc. Reactor Physics Topl. Mtg. (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7–10, 2002, American Nuclear Society (2002).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH, “An Analytic Nodal Method for Solving the 2-Group, Multi-Dimensional, Static and Transient Neutron Diffusion Equations,” Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Engineering (1979).
   Google Scholar
• H. FINNEMANN, F. BENNEWITZ, and M. R. WAGNER, “Interface Current Technique for Multidimensional Reactor Calculations,” Atomkernenergie, 30, 123 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• R. D. LAWRENCE, “Progress in Nodal Methods for the Solution of the Neutron Diffusion and Transport Equations,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 17, 271 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. S. MODAK and S. B. DEGWEKER, “Convergence of the Iteration Scheme in the Nodal Expansion Method for the Solution of the Diffusion Equation,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 13, 539 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• R. C. PENLAND, Y. Y. AZMY, and P. J. TURINSKY, “Error Analysis of the Nodal Expansion Method for Solving the Neutron Diffusion Equation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 125, 284 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• M. R. ZIKA and T. J. DOWNAR, “Numerical Divergence Effects of Equivalence Theory in the Nodal Expansion Method,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 115, 219 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. HAH and T. J. DOWNAR, “An Augmented Source Method for the Application of Nodal Equivalence Theory,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 121, 405 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. S. YANG, “Response Matrix Properties and Convergence Implications for an Interface-Current Nodal Formulation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 121, 416 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Y. AZMY and B. L. KIRK, “Convergence Properties of Iterative Algorithms for Solving the Nodal Diffusion Equations,” Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR90), Vol. 2, p. VIII–35, Marseille, France, April 23–27, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• G. R. CEFUS and E. W. LARSEN, “Stability Analysis of Coarse-Mesh Rebalance,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 105, 31 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SU, M. G. FIRED, and E. W. LARSEN, “Stability Analysis of The Variable Eddington Factor Method,” Transp. Theory Stat. Phys., 30, 439 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. R. CEFUS and E. W. LARSEN, “Stability Analysis of The Quasidiffusion and Second Moment Methods For Iteratively Solving Discrete-Ordinates Problems,” Transp. Theory Stat. Phys., 18, 493 (1989–1990).
   Google Scholar
• S. G. HONG and N. Z. CHO, “Convergence Analysis of the Angular-Dependent Rebalance Iteration Method in X-Y Geometry,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 80, 115 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• C. J. PARK and N. Z. CHO, “Additive Angular Dependent Rebalance with Extrapolation for Discrete Ordinates Transport Equation,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 86, 208 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• R. D. RICHTMEYER, Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems, New York University (1957).
   Google Scholar
• T. F. CHAN and H. C. ELMAN, “Fourier Analysis of Iterative Methods for Elliptic Problems,” SIAM Rev., 31, 20 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• E. W. LARSEN, “Unconditionally Stable Diffusion-Synthetic Acceleration Methods for the Slab Geometry Discrete Ordinates Equations. Part I: Theory,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 82, 47 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. PARK, “Higher-Order Difference Method for Solving the Neutron Diffusion and Transport Equation,” Thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Nuclear Engineering (2001).
   Google Scholar
• M. L. ADAMS and E. W. LARSEN, “Fast Iterative Methods For Discrete-Ordinates Particle Transport Calculations,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 82, 47 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• D. LEE, T. J. DOWNAR, and Y. KIM, “Convergence Analysis of the Nonlinear Coarse Mesh Finite Difference Method,” Int. Conf. Nuclear Mathematical and Computational Sciences (M&C2003), Gatlinburg, Tennessee, April 6–11, 2003, American Nuclear Society (2003).
   Google Scholar
• H. FINNEMANN, “NEACRP 2D LWR Core Transient Benchmark-Final Specifications,” NEACRP-L-335, Rev. 1, Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on Reactor Physics (1992).
   Google Scholar
• H. D. FISHER and H. FINNEMANN, “The Nodal Integration Method–A Diverse Solver for Neutron Diffusion Problems,” Atomkernenerg. Kerntech., 39, 229 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar