Variational Variance Reduction for Monte Carlo Eigenvalue and Eigenfunction Problems

References

• M. O. ALLAGI, J. D. LEWINS, and G. T. PARKS, “Variationally Processed Monte Carlo Transport Theory,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 25, 1055 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• M. 0. ALLAGI and J. D. LEWINS, “Real and Virtual Sampling in Variational Processing of Stochastic Simulation in Neutron Transport: The One-Dimensional Rod,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 25, 1521 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• C. L. BARRETT and E. W. LARSEN, “A Variationally-Enhanced Monte Carlo Algorithm for Neutron Shielding Problems,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 79, 166 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• C. L. BARRETT, “A Variationally-Based Variance Reduction Method for Monte Carlo Particle Transport Problems,” PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan (1999).
   Google Scholar
• C. L. BARRETT and E. W. LARSEN, “A Variational Variance Reduction Method for Monte Carlo Shielding and Eigenvalue Problems,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computation, Reactor Physics, and Environmental Analysis, Madrid, Spain, September 27–30, 1999, Vol. 2, p. 1371 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• C. L. BARRETT and E. W. LARSEN, “A Variationally-Based Variance Reduction Method for Monte Carlo Neutron Transport Calculations,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 28, 457 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE and E. W. LARSEN, “A New Variational Variance Reduction Method for Monte Carlo Source-Detector Problems,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 83, 336 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE and E. W. LARSEN, “Variational Variance Reduction for Monte Carlo Criticality Calculations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 84, 177 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE and E. W. LARSEN, “Variational Variance Reduction for Monte Carlo Criticality Problems,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Mathematical Methods for Nuclear Applications, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 9–13, 2001, American Nuclear Society (2001) (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE, “Variational Variance Reduction for Monte Carlo Reactor Analysis,” PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE and E. W. LARSEN, “Variational Variance Reduction for Monte Carlo Eigenfunction Problems,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 87, 227 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE and E. W. LARSEN, “Use of Monte Carlo Adjoint Simulations in VVR Criticality Calculations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 87, 228 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. DENSMORE and E. W. LARSEN, “Variational Variance Reduction for Criticality Calculations Using Monte Carlo Adjoint Fluxes,” Proc. Nuclear Mathematical and Computational Sciences: A Century in Review-A Century Anew (M&C 2003), Gatlinburg, Tennessee, April 7–10, 2003, American Nuclear Society (2003).
   Google Scholar
• M. BECKER, The Principles and Applications of Variational Methods, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1964).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. LEWINS, Importance: The Adjoint Function, Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (1965).
   Google Scholar
• S. KAPLAN, “Variational Methods in Nuclear Engineering,” Adv. Nucl. Sci. Technl, 5, 185 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEYJr., Variational Methods in Nuclear Reactor Physics, Academic Press, New York (1974).
   Google Scholar
• S. A. TURNER and E. W. LARSEN, “Automatic Variance Reduction for Three-Dimensional Monte Carlo Simulations by the Local Importance Function Transform—I: Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 127, 22 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. TURNER and E. W. LARSEN, “Automatic Variance Reduction for Three-Dimensional Monte Carlo Simulations by the Local Importance Function Transform—II: Numerical Results,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 127, 36 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. A. VAN RIPER, T. J. URBATSCH, P. D. SORAN, D. K. PARSONS, J. E. MOREL, G. W. MCKINNEY, S. R. LEE, L. A. CROTZER, F. W. BRINKLEY, T. E. BOOTH, J. W. ANDERSON, and R. E. ALCOUFFE, “AVATA0R—Automatic Variance Reduction in Monte Carlo Calculations,” Proc. Joint Int. Conf. Mathematical Methods and Supercomputing for Nuclear Applications, Saratoga Springs, New York, October 6–10, 1997, Vol. 1, p. 661, American Nuclear Society (1997).
   Google Scholar
• I. LUX and L. KOBLINGER, Monte Carlo Particle Transport Methods: Neutron and Photon Calculations, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1991).
   Google Scholar
• E. W. LARSEN and J. D. DENSMORE, “New Zero-Variance Methods for Monte Carlo Criticality and Source-Detector Problems,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 84, 175 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• G. C. POMRANING, “Variational Principle for Eigenvalue Equations,” J. Math. Phys., 8, 149 (1967).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. E. LEWIS and W. F. MILLER, Jr., Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois (1993).
   Google Scholar
• J. J. DUDERSTADT and L. J. HAMILTON, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1976).
   Google Scholar
• V. VOLTERRA, Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations, Dover Publications, New York (1959).
   Google Scholar
• J. E. MARSDEN and A. J. TROMBA, Vector Calculus, W.H. Freeman & Company, New York (1996).
   Google Scholar
• R. J. BRISSENDEN and A. R. GARLICK, “Biases in the Estimation of keff and Its Error by Monte Carlo Methods,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 13, 63 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. GELBARD and A. G. GU, “Biases in Monte Carlo Eigenvalue Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 117, 1 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar