Newton’s Method for Solving k-Eigenvalue Problems in Neutron Diffusion Theory

References

• E. L. WACHSPRESS, Iterative Solution of Elliptic Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1966).
   Google Scholar
• L. A. HAGEMAN and D. M. YOUNG, Applied Iterative Methods, Dover Publications, Mineola, New York (2004).
   Google Scholar
• T. DOWNAR, D. LEE, Y. XU, and T. KOZLOWSKI, PARCS v2.6 U.S. NRC Core Neutronics Simulator, Theory Manual, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (2004).
   Google Scholar
• V. VIDAL, G. VERDÚ, D. GINESTAR, and J. MUNÕZCOBO, “Variational Acceleration for Subspace Iteration Method: Application to Nuclear Power Reactors,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 41, 391 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• J. S. WARSA, T. A. WAREING, J. E. MOREL, and J. M. McGHEE, “Krylov Subspace Iterations for Deterministic k-Eigenvalue Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 147, 26 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. VERDÚ, R. MIRO, D. GINESTAR, and V. VIDAL, “The Implicit Restarted Arnoldi Method, An Efficient Alternative to Solve the Neutron Diffusion Equation,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 26, 579 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. MAHADEVAN and J. RAGUSA, “Novel Hybrid Scheme to Compute Several Dominant Eigenmodes for Reactor Analysis Problems,” Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR), Interlaken, Switzerland, September 14–19, 2008 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• D. F. GILL and Y. Y. AZMY, “A Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov Iterative Scheme for Criticality Calculations Based on the Neutron Diffusion Equation,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics, Computational Methods and Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, New York, May 3–7, 2009, American Nuclear Society (2009) (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• D. F. GILL, “Newton-Krylov Methods for the Solution of the k-Eigenvalue Problem in Multigroup Neutronics Calculations,” PhD Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (2009).
   Google Scholar
• D. A. KNOLL, H. PARK, and K. SMITH, “Application of the Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov Method in Computational Reactor Physics,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics, Computational Methods and Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, New York, May 3–7, 2009, American Nuclear Society (2009) (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• D. F. GILL and Y. Y. AZMY, “Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov as an Alternative to Power Iterations for the k-Eigenvalue Transport Problem,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 100, 291 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• D. F. GILL, Y. Y. AZMY, J. D. DENSMORE, and J. S. WARSA, “Newton’s Method for the Computation of k-Eigenvalues in SN Transport Applications,” Nucl. Sci. Eng. (to be published).
   Google Scholar
• P. M. ANSELONE and L. B. BALL, “The Solution of Characteristic Value-Vector Problems by Newtons’s Method,” Numerische Mathematik, 11, 38 (1967).
   Google Scholar
• G. PETERS and J. WILKINSON, “Inverse Iteration, Ill-Conditioned Equations and Newton’s Method,” SIAM Rev., 21, 3, 339 (1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. DUDERSTADT and L. J. HAMILTON, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, John Wiley and Sons (1976).
   Google Scholar
• R. S. DEMBO, S. C. EISENSTAT, and T. STEIHAUG, “Inexact Newton Methods,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 19, 400 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. KNOLL and D. KEYES, “Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov Methods: A Survey of Approaches and Applications,” J. Comput. Phys., 193, 2, 357 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. H. GOLUB and C. F. VAN LOAN, Matrix Computations, 3rd ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Y. SAAD, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 1st ed., PWS Pub Co., Boston (1996).
   Google Scholar
• D. R. FERGUSON and K. L. DERSTINE, “Optimized Iteration Strategies and Data Management Considerations for Fast Reactor Finite Difference Diffusion Theory Codes,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 64, 2, 593 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. K. SEAGER, “A SLAP for the Masses,” UCRL-100267, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Dec. 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Y. SAAD, “Sparskit: A Basic Tool Kit for Sparse Matrix Computations,” NASA-CR-185876, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (May 1990).
   Google Scholar
• “Argonne Code Center: Benchmark Problem Book,” ANL-7416, Supp. 2, ID11-A2, Argonne National Laboratory (1977).
   Google Scholar
• A. HEBERT, “Application of the Hermite Method for Finite Element Reactor Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 91, 34 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. XU and T. DOWNAR, “Optimal Perturbation Size for Matrix Free Newton/Krylov Methods,” Proc. Joint Int. Topl. Mtg. Mathematics and Computation and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications, Monterey, California, April 15–19, 2007, American Nuclear Society (2007).
   Google Scholar
• R. S. DEMBO and T. STEIHAUG, “Truncated-Newton Algorithms for Large-Scale Unconstrained Optimization,” Math. Program, 26, 190 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. C. EISENSTAT and H. F. WALKER, “Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 17, 16 (Jan. 1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-B. AN, Z.-Y. MO, and X.-P. LIU, “A Choice of Forcing Terms in Inexact Newton Method,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 200, 47 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar