A Technique for Accounting for Multigroup Cross-Section Interdependence in Sensitivity Calculations

REFERENCES

• E. GREENSPAN, Y. KARNI, and D. GILAI, “Higher Order Effects in Cross Section Sensitivity Analysis,” ORNL/RSIC-42, p. 231, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1979).
   Google Scholar
• M. L. WILLIAMS,B. L. BROADHEAD, and C. V. PARKS, “Eigenvalue Sensitivity Theory for Resonance-Shielded Cross Sections,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 138, 177 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. BLYSKAVKA, G. N. MANTUROV, M. N. NIKOLAEV, and A. M. TSIBOULIA, “MMK-KENO Code System,” IPPE-3145, Obninsk Institute for Physics and Power Engineering (2009) (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• K. F. RASKACH and A. A. BLYSKAVKA, “An Experience of Applying Iterated Fission Probability Method to Calculation of Effective Kinetics Parameters and keff Sensitivities with Monte Carlo,” Int. Conf. Reactor Physics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9–14, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• G. N. MANTUROV, M. N. NIKOLAEV, and A. M. TSIBOULIA, “ABBN-93 Group Data Library. Part 1: Nuclear Data for the Calculations of Neutron and Photon Radiation Fields,” INDC (CCP)-409/L, p. 65, IAEA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• “Multigroup Constant Set for Calculation of Neutron and Photon Radiation Fields and Functionals, Including the CONSYST2 Program,” RSICC DLC-182, ORNL (1995).
   Google Scholar
• L. N. USACHEV, Proc. First U.N. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Vol. 5, p. 503 (1955).
   Google Scholar
• B. T. REARDEN, “Perturbation Theory Eigenvalue Sensitivity Analysis with Monte Carlo Techniques,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 146, 367 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. KIEDROWSKI, F. BROWN, and P. WILSON, “Calculating Kinetics Parameters and Reactivity Changes with Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo,” Int. Conf. Reactor Physics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9–14, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• H. HURWITZ, “Physical Interpretation of the Adjoint Flux: Iterated Fission Probability,” Naval Reactor Physics Handbook, Vol. I, pp. 864–869, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Y. NAGAYA and T. MORI, “Impact of Perturbed Fission Source on the Effective Multiplication Factor in Monte Carlo Perturbation Calculations,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 42, 5, 428 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. F. RASKACH, “An Improvement of the Monte Carlo Generalized Differential Operator Method by Taking into Account First- and Second-Order Perturbations of Fission Source,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 162, 158 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. OLHOEFT, “The Doppler Effect for a Non-Uniform Temperature Distribution in Reactor Fuel Elements,” WCAP-2048, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Atomic Power Division, Pittsburgh (1962).
   Google Scholar
• K. F. RASKACH, “Extension of Differential Operator Method to Inhomogeneous Problems with Internal and External Neutron Sources,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 165, 320 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. BLYSKAVKA, K. F. RASKACH, and A. M. TSIBOULIA, “An Algorithm for Calculating keff Sensitivities to Group Cross Sections Using Monte Carlo Method and Features of Its Implementation in the MMK-KENO Code,” Proc. M&C 2005, Avignon, France, September 12–15, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Group Constants for Nuclear Reactor Calculations, I. I. BONDARENKO, Ed., Consultants Bureau, New York (1964).
   Google Scholar
• R. E. MacFARLANE, “TRANSX 2: A Code for Interfacing MATXS Cross-Section Libraries to Nuclear Transport Codes,” LA-12312-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Dec. 16, 1993).
   Google Scholar
• N. M. GREENE, “BONAMI: Resonance Self-Shielding by the Bondarenko Method,” ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V2/R6, ORNL (2000).
   Google Scholar
• M. N. NIKOLAEV et al., Sov. At. Energy, 29, 689 (1970).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. N. NIKOLAEV, “Comments on the Probability Table Method,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 61, 286 (1976).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. LEVITT, “The Probability Table Method for Treating Unresolved Neutron Resonances in Monte Carlo Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 49, 450 (1972).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. RIBON et al., “Probability Tables and Gauss Quadrature: Application to Neutron Cross-Sections in the Unresolved Energy Range,” Proc. Top. Mtg. Advances in Reactor Physics and Safety, Saratoga Springs, Florida, September 17–19, 1986, Vol. 1, pp. 280–291 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• T. YAMAMOTO and T. TAKEDA, “Subgroup Parameters Based on Orthogonal Factorization,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 44,1, 36 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SAUER, “Approximate Escape Probability,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 16, 329 (1963).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. WILLIAMS and D. GILAI, “Incorporation of Clad Effects into Sauer’s Method for Computing Dancoff Factors,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 9, 137 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. D. GALANIN, Introduction to Thermal Nuclear Reactor Theory, Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1990) (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• G. I. BELL and S. GLASSTONE, Nuclear Reactor Theory, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Y. A. CHAO and A. S. MARTINEZ, “On Approximations to the Neutron Escape Probability from an Absorbing Body,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 66, 254 (1978).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “MCNP—A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Code,” Version 5, RSICC LA-UR-03-1987, LA-ORNL (2003).
   Google Scholar
• S. J. RAFFETY and J. T. MIHALCZO, “Homogenized Critical Assemblies of 2 and 3% Enriched Uranium in Paraffin,” Y-DR-14, Union Carbide Corp., Nuclear Division, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant (1969).
   Google Scholar
• J. ROWLANDS et al., “LWR Pin Cell Benchmark Intercomparisons,” TFRPD1-27, NEA-OECD (1999).
   Google Scholar