Fabrication of Uniform Ce/Eu Oxide Microparticles by a Microfluidic Co-Sol-Gel Process as an Analog Preparation of MA-Bearing Ceramic Nuclear Fuel Particles

REFERENCES

• R. L. MURRAY, Nuclear Energy—An Introduction to the Concepts, Systems, and Applications of Nuclear Processes, p. 427, Butterworth-Heinemann, Waltham, Massachusetts (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416654-7.00024-1.
   Google Scholar
• G. KESSLER, “Requirements for Nuclear Energy in the 21st Century Nuclear Energy as a Sustainable Energy Source,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 40, 3–4, 309 (2002); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(02)00024-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. WESTLEN, “Reducing Radiotoxicity in the Long Run,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 49, 8, 597 (2007); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• M. SALVATORES, “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategies Including Partitioning and Transmutation,” Nucl. Eng. Des, 235, 7, 805 (2005); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• M. SALVATORES, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Science and Engineering, p. 501, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Sawston, United Kingdom (2012).
   Google Scholar
• K. IKEDA et al., “Technology Readiness Assessment of Partitioning and Transmutation in Japan and Issues Toward Closed Fuel Cycle,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 74, 242 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.12.009.
   Google Scholar
• W. MASCHEK et al., “Accelerator Driven Systems for Transmutation: Fuel Development, Design and Safety,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 50, 2–6, 333 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.066.
   Google Scholar
• M. OSAKA, S. MIWA, and Y. TACHI, “Simple Fabrication Process for CeO2-MgO Composite as Surrogate for Actinide-Containing Target for Use in Nuclear Fuel,” Ceram. Int, 32, 6, 659 (2006); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.04.026.
   Google Scholar
• S. PILLON et al., “Aspects of Fabrication of Curium-Based Fuels and Targets,” J. Nucl. Mater, 320, 1–2, 36 (2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00168-5.
   Google Scholar
• D. D. SOOD, “The Role Sol-Gel Process for Nuclear Fuels—An Overview,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol, 59, 3, 404 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10971-010-2273-y.
   Google Scholar
• M. VESPA et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of (U,Am)O2-x Transmutation Targets,” J. Nucl. Mater, 421, 1–3, 80 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.055.
   Google Scholar
• A. FERNANDEZ, R. J. M. KONINGS, and J. SOMERS, “Design and Fabrication of Specific Ceramic-Metallic Fuels and Targets,” J. Nucl. Mater, 319, 44 (2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00132-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. YE et al., “Fabrication of Size-Controlled CeO2 Microparticles by a Microfluidic Sol-Gel Process as an Analog Preparation of Ceramic Nuclear Fuel Particles,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol, 50, 8, 774 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2013.796897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. A. SERRA and Z. CHANG, “Microfluidic-Assisted Synthesis of Polymer Particles,” Chem. Eng. Technol, 31, 8, 1099 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200800219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. CHANG et al., “Co-Axial Capillaries Microfluidic Device for Synthesizing Size- and Morphology-Controlled Polymer Core-Polymer Shell Particles,” Lab Chip, 9, 3007 (2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b913703c.
   Google Scholar
• H. S. KIM et al., “Applicability of CeO2 as a Surrogate for PuO2 in a MOX Fuel Development,” J. Nucl. Mater, 378, 1, 98 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. V. NORTON, F. A. DIGIANO, and R. T. HALLEN, “Selective Separation of Europium Using Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration,” Water Environ. Res, 69, 244 (1997); http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143097X125416.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. COLLINS, M. H. LLOYD, and R. L. FELLOWS, “The Basic Chemistry Involved in the Internal-Gelation Method of Precipitating Uranium as Determined by pH Measurements,” Radiochim. Acta, 42, 3, 121 (1987); http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/ract.1987.42.3.121.
   Google Scholar
• V. N. VAIDYA, “Status of Sol-Gel Process for Nuclear Fuels,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol, 46, 3, 369 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10971-008-1725-0.
   Google Scholar
• J. LI et al., “Fabrication and Characteristics of Li4SiO4 Pebbles by a Novel Capillary-Based Microfluidic Wet Process,” J. Nucl. Mater, 440, 1–3, 283 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.05.020.
   Google Scholar
• C. SERRA et al., “A Predictive Approach of the Influence of the Operating Parameters on the Size of Polymer Particles Synthesized in a Simplified Microfluidic System,” Langmuir, 23, 14, 7745 (2007); http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la063289s.
   Google Scholar
• R. V. K. WANDEKAR, B. N. WANI, and S. R. BHARADWAJ, “Disparity in Properties of 20-mol% Eu-Doped Ceria Synthesized by Different Routes,” Solid State Sci, 12, 1, 8 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.09.016.
   Google Scholar
• B. R. REHANI et al., “Crystallite Size Estimation of Elemental and Composite Silver Nano-Powders Using XRD Principles,” Indian J. Pure Ap. Phy, 44, 2, 157 (2006).
   Google Scholar