The State-of-the-Art Theory and Applications of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty Methods

References

• B. E. BOYACK, I. CATTON, R. B. DUFFEY, P. GRIFFITH, K. R. KATSMA, G. S. LELLOUCHE, S. LEVY, U. S. ROHATGI, G. E. WILSON, W. WULFF, and N. ZUBER, “Quantifying Reactor Safety Margin Parts 1 to 6,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 119, 1 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Report of a CSNI Workshop on Uncertainty Analysis Methods, London 1-4 March 1994,” NEA/CSNI/R(1994)20, Vols. 1 and 2, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1994).
   Google Scholar
• “Report on the Uncertainty Methods Study,” NEA/CSNI/R(97)35, Vols. 1 and 2, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997).
   Google Scholar
• “Proceedings of the OECD/CSNI Workshop on Transient Thermalhydraulic and Neutronic Codes Requirements Held in Annapolis,” US NRC NUREG/CP-0159 and OECD/CSNI Report NEA/CSNI R(97)4, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997).
   Google Scholar
• “Best-Estimate Methods in Thermal Hydraulic Safety Analysis: Summary and Conclusions of an OECD-CSNI Seminar,” nEa/CSNI/R(99) 22, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1999).
   Google Scholar
• “Advanced Thermal-Hydraulic and Neutronic Codes: Current and Future Applications,” NEA/CSNI/R(2001)9, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001).
   Google Scholar
• A. PROŠEK and B. MAVKO, “Evaluating Code Uncertainty—II: An Optimal Statistical Estimator Method to Evaluate the Uncertainties of Calculated Time Trends,” Nucl. Technol., 126, 186 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. GRABEC and W. SACHSE, Synergetics of Measurements, Prediction and Control, Chap. 9: Modeling by Non-Parametric Regression, pp. 203–217, Series in Synergetics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (1997).
   Google Scholar
• A. PROŠEK and B. MAVKO, “Response Surface Generation with Optimal Statistical Estimator,” J. Mech. Eng.,46, 1, 14 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• “Statistical Tolerance Limits,” Math Options, Inc.; available on the Internet at http://www.mathoptions.com/tolerance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• S. S. WILKS, “Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits,” Ann. Math. Stat., 12, 91 (1941).
   Google Scholar
• A. GUBA, M. MAKAI, and L. PAL, “Statistical Aspects of Best Estimate Method—I,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 80, 217 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• W. T. NUTT and G. B. WALLIS, “Evaluation of Nuclear Safety from the Outputs of Computer Codes in the Presence of Uncertainties,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 83, 57 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. MAKAI and L. PAL, “Reply to Contribution of Graham B. Wallis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 80, 313 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• A. DE CRÉCY and P. BAZIN, “Quantification of the Uncertainties of the Physical Models of CATHARE2,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. Y. LEE and C. H. BAN, “Code-Accuracy-Based Uncertainty Estimation (CABUE) Methodology for Large-Break Loss-of-Coolant Accidents,” Nucl. Technol., 148, 335 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. PETRUZZI, F. D’AURIA, J. MICAELLI, A. DE CRÉCY, and J. ROYEN, “The BEMUSE Programme (Best-Estimate Methods— Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation),” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Y. S. BANG et al., “An Uncertainty Evaluation Method and Application to Prediction of LOFT L2-5 Experiment,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• F. D’AURIA and W. GIANNOTTI, “Development of a Code with the Capability of Internal Assessment of Uncertainty,” Nucl. Technol., 131, 159 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. PETRUZZI, W. GIANNOTTI, F. D’AURIA, and K. IVANOV, “Enlargement of the Uncertainty Database of the CIAU Methodology,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• E. F. HASKIN, B. D. STAPLE, and C. DING, “Efficient Uncertainty Analyses Using Fast Probability Integration,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 166, 225 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. CHONJACKI and A. QUONSY, “The IPSN Method for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis and the Associated Software: SUNSET,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-4), New Orleans, Louisiana, March 10–14, 1996, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1996).
   Google Scholar
• S. R. PARK et al., “Development of an Uncertainty Quantification Method of the Best Estimate Large LOCA Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 135, 367 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• M. G. ORTIZ and L. S. GHAN, “Uncertainty Analysis of Minimum Vessel Liquid Inventory During a Small-Break LOCAin a B&W Plant—An Application of the CSAU Methodology Using the RELAP5/MOD3 Computer Code,” NUREG/CR-5818, EGG-2665, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (1992).
   Google Scholar
• B. MAVKO, A. STRITAR, and A. PROŠEK, “Application of Code Scaling, Applicability and Uncertainty Methodology to Large Break LOCAAnalysis of Two-Loop PWR,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 143, 95 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. D’AURIA, N. DEBRECIN, and G. M. GALASSI, “Outline of the Uncertainty Methodology Based on Accuracy Extrapolation,” Nucl. Technol., 109, 21 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. GLAESER, “Uncertainty Evaluation of Thermal-Hydraulic Code Results,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• H. GLAESER, E. HOFER, M. KLOOS, and T. SKOREK, “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of a Post-Experiment Calculation in Thermal Hydraulics,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe.,45, 1-2, 19 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• A. PROŠEK and B. MAVKO, “Evaluating Code Uncertainty—I: Using the CSAU Method for Uncertainty Analysis of a Two-Loop PWR SBLOCA,” Nucl. Technol., 126, 170 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. PROŠEK and B. MAVKO, “Needs of the CSAU Uncertainty Method,” Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Option in Countries with Small and Medium Electricity Grids, Dubrovnik, Croatia, June 19–22, 2000, pp. 406–413, Croatian Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• A. PROŠEK and B. MAVKO, “A Tool for Quantitative Assessment of Code Calculations with an Improved Fast Fourier Transform Based Method,” Electrotech. Rev., 70, 5 (2003); available on the Internet at http://ev.fe.uni-lj.si/5-2003/prosek.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• A. PROŠEK, “Optimal Statistical Estimator for Efficient Generation of the Response Surface,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• S. KAWAMURA and T. HARA, “Best Estimate Methods for Licensing Analysis,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• R. B. DUFFEY, H. E. SILLS, A. ABDUL-RAZZAK, V. S. KRISHNAN, B. H. McDONALD, and T. H. ANDRES, “Safety Analysis: The Treatment of Uncertainty,” Proc. 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Francisco, California, July 18–23, 1999, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1999).
   Google Scholar
• H. E. SILLS, A. ABDUL-RAZZAK, R. B. DUFFEY, and N. POPOV, “Best Estimate Methods for Safety Margin Assessment,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• A. ABDUL-RAZZAK, J. ZHANG, H. E. SILLS, L. FLATT, D. JENKINS, D. J. WALLACE, and N. POPOV, “The Application of Best Estimate and Uncertainty Analysis Methodology to Large LOCAPower Pulse in a CANDU 6 Reactor,” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-10), Arlington, Virginia, April 14–18, 2002, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2002).
   Google Scholar
• H. GLAESER, “Large Break LOCA Uncertainty Evaluation and Comparison with Conservative Calculation,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• M. KRI#x0160;TOF and I. VOJTEK, “Uncertainty Analyses for LB LOCAin VVER-440/213,” EUROSAFE 2003, Paris, France, November 25-26, 2003, pp. 45–54, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire and Gesellschaft für Anlagenund Reaktorsicherheit; available on the Internet at http://www.eurosafe-forum.org/products/data/50pe_143_24_1_seminaire2_4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• M. Y. YOUNG et al., “Application of Code Scaling Applicability and Uncertainty Methodology to the Large Break Loss of Coolant,” Nucl. Eng. Des.,186, 1-2, 39 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Y. YOUNG et al., “Best Estimate Analysis of the Large Break Loss of Coolant Accident,” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-6), San Diego, California, May 10–15, 1998, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1998).
   Google Scholar
• J. ZHANG, S. M. BAJOREK, R. M. KEMPER, M. E. NISSLEY, N. PETKOV, and L. E. HOCHREITER, “Application of the COBRA/TRAC Best-Estimate Methodology to the AP600 Large-Break LOCA Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 186, 1-2, 279 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. R. GALETTI CAMARGO, “Technical and Regulatory Concerns in the Use of Best Estimate Methodologies in an LBLOCA Analysis Licensing Process,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis, Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• J. Y. SAUVAGE and S. LAROCHE, “Validation of the Deterministic Realistic Method Applied to Cathare on LB LOCA Experiments,” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-10), Arlington, Virginia, April 14–18, 2002, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2002).
   Google Scholar
• N. MESSER and M. CHAMP, “Assessment of the ‘Deterministic Realistic Method’ Applied to Large LOCA Analysis,” EUROSAFE 2000, Köln, Germany, November 6-7, 2000, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire and Gesellschaft für Anlagenund Reaktorsicherheit; available on the Internet at http://www.eurosafeforum.org/products/data/5/pe_305_24_1_sem1_9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• J. C. LUXAT, R. GHUGET, D. K. LAU, and F. TRAN, “Development and Application of Ontario Power Generation’s Best Estimate Nuclear Safety Analysis Methodology,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• R. URBONAS, A. KALIATKA, and E. USPURAS, “Analysis of GDH Blockage Event at Ignalina NPP,” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-11), Tokyo, Japan, April 20-23, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (2003).
   Google Scholar
• E. URBONAVICIUS, E. BABILAS, and S. RIMKEVICIUS, “Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis for Ignalina NPP Confinement in Case of Loss of Coolant Accident,” Int. Conf. Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2003, Portorož, Slovenia, September 8–11, 2003, Nuclear Society of Slovenia (2003).
   Google Scholar
• R. URBONAS, A. KALIATKA, E. USPURAS, and V. VILEINISKIS, “RBMK-1500 Accident Analysis Using BE Approach,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Safety Margins of Operating Reactors: Analysis of Uncertainties and Implications for Decision Making,” IAEA-t EcDOC-1332, International Atomic Energy Agency (2003).
   Google Scholar
• R. C. BORGES, F. D’AURIA, and A.C.M. ALVIM, “Independent Qualification of the CIAU Tool Based on the Uncertainty Estimate in the Prediction of Angra 1 NPP Inadvertent Load Rejection Transient,” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-10), Arlington, Virginia, April 14–18, 2002, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2002).
   Google Scholar
• C. H. BAN, S. Y. LEE, and C. K. SUNG, “Development and Application of KEPRI Realistic Evaluation Methodology (KREM) for LB-LOCA,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2004), Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Realistic Large Break LOCA Methodology,” EMF-2103 (NP)(A), Revision 0, AREVA NP (April 2003).
   Google Scholar
• K. MUFTUOGLU, K. OHKAWA, C. FREPOLI, and M. NISSLEY, “Comparison of Realistic Large Break LOCA Analyses of a 3-Loop Westinghouse Plant Using Response Surface and Statistical Sampling Techniques,” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-12), Arlington, Virginia, April 25–29, 2004, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2004).
   Google Scholar
• C. FREPOLI, K. OHKAWA, and R. M. KEMPER, “Realistic Large Break LOCA Analysis of AP1000 with ASTRUM,” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics, Operations and Safety (NUTHOS-6), Nara, Japan, October 4-8, Atomic Energy Society of Japan (2004).
   Google Scholar
• M. ZIMMERMANN, “Current and Future Applications of Thermal-Hydraulic and Neutronic Best-Estimate Methods in Swiss Licensing Process,” NEA/CSNI/R(2001)9, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001).
   Google Scholar
• G. TH. ANALYTIS, “Study of the Post-CHF Wall Heat Transfer Package of RELAP5/MOD3.3 During Blow-Down,” Annals Nucl. Energy, 31, 9, 1053 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• G. TH. ANALYTIS and P. CODDINGTON, “Development and Assessment of TRAC-BF1 for BWR LOCA Applications,” Proc. Int. Mtg. Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis (BE-2000), Washington, D.C., November 12–16, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar