Advances in the Subcritical, Gas-Cooled, Fast Transmutation Reactor Concept

References

• W. M. STACEY et al., “A Fusion Transmutation of Waste Reactor,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 41, 116 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. N. MAUER, W. M. STACEY, J. MANDREKAS, and E. A. HOFFMAN, “A Superconducting Tokamak Fusion Transmutation of Waste Reactor,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 45, 55 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY et al., “A Subcritical, Helium Cooled, Fast Reactor for the Transmutation of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Nucl. Technol., 156, 99 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY et al., “A Subcritical, Gas-Cooled Fast Transmutation Reactor with a Fusion Neutron Source,” Nucl. Technol., 150, 162 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, J. MANDREKAS, and E. A. HOFFMAN, “Sub-Critical Transmutation Reactors with Tokamak Fusion Neutron Sources,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 47, 1210 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. A. HOFFMAN and W. M. STACEY, “Comparative Fuel Cycle Analysis of Critical and Subcritical Fast Reactor Transmutation Systems,” Nucl. Technol., 144, 83 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. MADDOX and W. M. STACEY, “Fuel Cycle Analysis of a Subcritical, Fast, He-Cooled Transmutation Reactor with a Fusion Neutron Source,” Nucl. Technol. (to be published).
   Google Scholar
• ITER Web site; available on the Internet at http://iter.org.
   Google Scholar
• LONG et al., “Fabrication of ORNL Fuel Irradiated in the Peachbottom Reactor and Post-Irradiation Examination of the Recycle Test Elements 7 and 4,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oct. 1974).
   Google Scholar
• D. A. PETTI et al., “Key Differences in the Fabrication, Irradiation and High Temperature Accident Testing of U. S. and German TRISO-Coated Particle Fuel, and Their Implications on Fuel Performance,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 222, 281 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. KADOMTSEV et al., “USSR Contribution to the Phase IIA INTOR Workshop,” Vol. 2, p. VIII–64 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• M. SAWAN, University of Wisconsin, Personal Communication (2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Fuel Performance and Fission Product Behavior in Gas Cooled Reactors,” IAEA-TECDOC-978, International Atomic Energy Agency (1997).
   Google Scholar
• W. VAN ROOJEN, “Improving Fuel Cycle Design and Safety Characteristics of a Gas Cooled Reactor,” PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology (2006).
   Google Scholar
• K. MILLER et al. “Consideration of the Effects of Partial Debonding of the IPyC and Particle Asphericity on TRISO-Coated Fuel Behavior,” J. Nuc. Mater., 334, 79 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. C. GAULD, O. W. HERMANN, and R. M. WESTFALL, “ORIGEN-S: SCALE System Module to Calculate Fuel Depletion, Actinide Transmutation, Fission Product Buildup and Decay, and Associated Radiation Source Terms,” NUREG/CR-0200, Revision 7, Volume II, Section F7 (ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V2/R7) U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2004).
   Google Scholar
• M. ZHOU, Georgia Institute of Technology, Personal Communication (2006).
   Google Scholar
• J. T. BUSBY, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Personal Communication (2006).
   Google Scholar
• S. T. NOZAWA et al., “Determining the Shear Properties of the PyC/SiC Interface for a Model TRISO Fuel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 350, 182 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. YOSHITAKE et al., “Ring-Tensile Properties of Irradiated Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Ferritic/Martensitic Steel Claddings,” J. Nucl. Mater., 344, 329 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. UKAI and M. FUJIWARA, “Perspective of ODS Alloys Application in Nuclear Environments,” J. Nucl. Mater., 307, 749 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. UKAI et al., “R&D of Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Ferritic Martensitic Steels for FBR,” J. Nucl. Mater., 258, 1745 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. ZINKLE, “Advanced Materials for Fusion Technology,” presented at 23rd Symp. Fusion Technology, Venice, Italy, September 20–24, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• R. JONES, “SiCf/SiC Composites for Advanced Nuclear Applications,” Ceramic Engineering and Science Proc., Vol. 24: Proc. 27th Annual Conf. and Exposition Advanced Ceramics and Composites, Cocoa Beach, Florida, January 26–31, 2003, p. 261, American Ceramic Society (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “NIST Property Data Summary for Silicon Carbid (SiC),” National Institute of Standards and Technology; available on the Internet at http://www.ceramics.nist.gov/srd/summary/ftgsic.htm (Feb. 2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. BOTTCHER, S. UKAI, and M. INOUE, “ODS Steel Clad Mox Fuel-Pin Fabrication and Irradiation Performance in EBR-II,” Nucl. Technol., 138, 238 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. BAIRIOT and G. VANHELLEMONT, “Production of Thorium and Plutonium-Diluted Sol-Gel Particles,” Sol-Gel Processes for Ceramic Nuclear Fuels, Proc. Panel on Sol-Gel Processes for Ceramic Nuclear Fuels, Vienna, Austria, May 6–10, 1968, International Atomic Energy Agency (1968).
   Google Scholar
• R. G. WYMER, “Laboratory and Engineering Studies of Sol-Gel Processes at Oak Ridge National Laboratory,” Sol-Gel Processes for Ceramic Nuclear Fuels, Proc. Panel on Sol-Gel Processes for Ceramic Nuclear Fuels, Vienna, Austria, May 6–10, 1968, International Atomic Energy Agency (1968).
   Google Scholar
• W. J. LACKEY and T. L. STARR, “Fabrication of Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites by Chemical Vapor Infiltration: Processing, Structure and Properties,” Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites, K. S. MAZDIYASNI, Ed., Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey (1990).
   Google Scholar
• D. TEDDER and R. HOROWITZ, “Concepts in Waste Management: Decontamination of Plutonium-Bearing Mixed Wastes with Efficient Water and Acid Recycle,” Sep. Sci. Technol., 38, 12 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. W. TEDDER and E. P. HOROWITZ, “Efficient Strategies for Partitioning Actinides from Alkaline Wastes,” Ind. Engr. Chem. Res.,44, 3, 606 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. TAN et al., “Simulation and Analysis for Melt Casting A Metallic Fuel Pin Incorporating Volatile Actinides,” Proc. ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, D.C., November 16–21, 2003, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “Actinide Separation Chemistry in Nuclear Waste Streams and Materials,” NEA/NSC/DOC (97) 19, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (1997).
   Google Scholar
• E. ZIMMER and C. GANGULY, “Reprocessing and Refabrication of Thorium-Based Fuels,” I nstitut für chemische Technologie der nuklearen Entsorgung, Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH; available on the Internet at http://www.iaea.org/inis/aws/fnss/fulltext/0412_8.pdf (2005).
   Google Scholar
• G. VANDEGRIFT et al., “Lab-Scale Demonstration of the UREX+ Process,” presented at Waste Management Conference, Tucson, Arizona, February 29-March 4, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• J. LAW et al., “Development and Demonstration of Solvent Extraction Processes for the Separation of Radionuclides from Acidic Radioactive Waste” Waste Management, 19, 27 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. OZAWA et al., “A New Reprocessing System Composed of PUREX and TRUEX Processes for Total Separation of Long-Lived Radionuclides,” Proc. Fifth OECD/NEA Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, Mol, Belgium; November 25–27, 1998, SCK-CEN (1998).
   Google Scholar
• C. DE OLIVEIRAand A. GODDARD, “EVENT-AMultidimensional Finite Element-Spherical Harmonics Radiation Transport Code,” Proc. Int. Seminar 3-D Deterministic Radiation Transport Codes, Paris, France, December 2–3, 1996, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996).
   Google Scholar
• “MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5,” J. F. BRIESMEISTER, Ed., Los Alamos National Laboratory (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “KENO V.a: An Improved Monte Carlo Criticality Program,” NUREG/CR-0200, Rev. 7, Vol. II, Section F11, ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/R7, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2004).
   Google Scholar
• TRANSX 2”; available on the Internet at http://t2.lanl.gov/codes/html.
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, Nuclear Reactor Physics, Chap. 2, Wiley-Interscience, New York (2001).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, Fusion, Chap. 10, Wiley-Interscience, New York (1984).
   Google Scholar
• M. KAMBE and M. UOTANI, “Design and Development of Fast Breeder Reactor Passive Reactivity Control Systems: LEM and LIM,” Nucl. Technol., 122, 179 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. KAZIMI and N. E. TODREAS, Nuclear Systems I: Thermal Hydraulics Fundamentals, pp. 295–338, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1990).
   Google Scholar
• M. J. MORAN and H. N. SHAPIRO, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 4th ed., pp. 441-467, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York (2000).
   Google Scholar
• E. TEUGHERT, K. HAAS, A. VAN HEEK, and P. KASTEN, “Distribution of the Decay Heat in Various Modular HTRs and Influence on Peak Fuel Temperatures,” presented at Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, August 10–14, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. KAZIMI and N. E. TODREAS, Nuclear Systems I: Thermal Hydraulics Fundamentals, pp. 16–17, 417, 684-685, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1990).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, Fusion Plasma Physics, Chap. 19, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany (2005).
   Google Scholar
• J. SCHLOSSER et al., Nucl. Fusion, 45, 512 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “ITER Technical Basis,” Section 2.4, “Divertor,” International Atomic Energy Agency (2001).
   Google Scholar
• “Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Fluent/Gambit, Version 6.1.22/s.1.2, Fluent Inc. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• C. B. BAXI and C. P. C. WONG, “Review of Helium Cooling for Fusion Reactor Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 51-52, 319 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. P. INCROPERA and D. P. DeWITT, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 5th ed., Chap. 8, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2002).
   Google Scholar
• B. R. MUNSON, D. F. YOUNG, and T. H. OKIISHI, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 4th ed., Chap. 8, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2002).
   Google Scholar
• ITER Technical Basis, Chap. 2.5 Additional Heating and Current Drive, G A0 FDR 101-07-13 R1.0 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• “Technical Parameters” Web Site http://www.iter.org/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• R. D. STAMBAUGH, “Future of Tokamak Facilities with a Burning Plasma Experiment,” presentation to National Academies Burning Plasma Assessment Committee, 008-03/RDS/RS, January 18, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Y. SAKAMOTO et al., “Stationary High Confinement Plasmas with Large Bootstrap Current Fraction in JT-60U,” EX/4-3.
   Google Scholar
• ITER Technical Basis, Chapter 2.1 Magnets, G A0 FDR 1 01-07-13 R1.0 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• M. HUGUET, “Key Engineering Features of the ITERFEAT Magnet System and Implications for the R&D Programme,” Nucl. Fusion, 41, 645 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Triton: A Two-Dimensional Depletion Sequence for Characterization of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” NUREG/Cr-200, Rev. 7, Vol. I Section T1, ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/R7 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• N. F. LANDERS, L. M. PETRIE, and D. F. HOLLENBACH, “CSAS: Control Module for Enhanced Criticality Safety Analysis Sequences,” NUREG/CR-200, Rev. 7, Vol. 1 Section C4, ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V1/R7.
   Google Scholar
• J. MANDREKAS, L. A. COTTTRILL, G. C. HAHN, and W. M. STACEY, “An Advanced Tokamak Neutron Source for a Fusion Transmutation of Waste Reactor,” Georgia Tech report GTFR-167 (2003).
   Google Scholar