Validation of the Cathare2 Code Against Oberhausen II Data

References

• N. TAUVERON, M. SAEZ, M. MARCHAND, T. CHATAING, G. GEFFRAYE, and C. BASSI, “Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Simulations of Direct Cycle Gas Cooled Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 235, 2527 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• O. WIDLUND, J. VAN RAVENSWAAY, G. GEFFRAYE, W. VAN NIEKERK, and N. TAUVERON, “Comparison of the Thermal-Fluid Analysis Codes CATHARE2 and FLOWNEX with Experimental Data from Pebble Bed Micro Model,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Cairo, Egypt, September 19–22, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. MELESE and R. KATZ, Thermal and Flow Design of Helium-Cooled Reactors, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois (1984).
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT and G. DEUSTER, “Das HeliumturbinenKraftwerk Oberhausen; Auslegung und Aufbau,” Energ. Tech., 26,1, 1 (1974).
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT, J. JOHANNING, and E. WEIDNER, “Instrumentierung und Verfahren zur Messung des dynamischen Verhaltens der Heliumturbinenanlage Oberhausen,” Atom-kernenerg. Kerntech., 43, 4, 225 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT, A General Review of Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines Using Fossil, Nuclear and Solar Energy, Thiemig-Taschenbuecher, 57, Munich, Germany (1975).
   Google Scholar
• L. BRIOTTET, “Review of Existing Technologies from Past HTR Experiences and Other Industries,” HTR-E-WP1 Project, EU-Report HTR-E 03/07 D1121 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT, “Beitrag zur Dokumentation über die 50 MW-Heliumturbinenanlage (‘Obheiz 2’),” draft technical report, Institut für Strömungsmaschinen, Universität Hannover (1988).
   Google Scholar
• M. ROBERT, M. FARVACQUE, M. PARENT, and B. FAY-DIDE, “CATHARE2 2 V2.5: A Fully Validated CATHARE2 Version for Various Applications,” Proc. 10th Int. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-10), Seoul, Korea, October 5–9, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• O. WIDLUND, G. GEFFRAYE, F. BENTIVOGLIO, A. MESSIE, A. RUBY, M. SAEZ, N. TAUVERON, and C. BASSI, “Overview of Gas-Cooled Reactor Applications with Cathare,” Proc. 11th Int. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-11), Avignon, France, October 2–6, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT, G. KREY, and R. KRAPP, “Operation and Control of the 50MW Closed-Cycle Helium Turbine Oberhausen,” Proc. Gas Turbine Conf., Zurich, Switzerland, March 30-April 4, 1974, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1974).
   Google Scholar
• G. HEWING and S. FORSTER, “The Dynamic Behaviour of Nuclear Helium Turbine Plants During By-Pass and Pressure Level Control Operations,” Proc. Gas Turbine Conf., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, March 27–31, 1977, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1977).
   Google Scholar
• N. TAUVERON, M. SAEZ, P. FERRAND, and F LE-BOEUF, “Axial Turbomachine Modelling with a 1D Axisym-metric Approach. Application to Gas Cooled Nuclear Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 237, 1679 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• S. LIEBLEIN, “Loss and Stall Analysis of Compressor Cascades,” Trans ASME J. Basic Eng., 387 (1959).
   Google Scholar
• W. C. SWAN, “APractical Method of Predicting Transonic-Compressor Performance,” J. Eng. Power, 322 (1961).
   Google Scholar
• C. C. KOCH and L. H. SMITH, “Loss Sources and Magnitude in Axial-Flow Compressors,” J. Eng. Power, 411 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• W. R. DAVIS and D. A. J. MILAR, “Throughflow Calculations Based on Matrix Inversion: Loss Prediction,” AGARD Report (1980).
   Google Scholar
• S. L. DIXON, Fluid Mechanics: Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, Pergamon Press, New York (1975).
   Google Scholar
• G. HUBERT and K. J. BAUERMEISTER, “Probleme der sekundärströmung in axialen Turbomaschinen,” VDI-Forschungsh., 29, 1 (1963).
   Google Scholar
• B. LAKSHMINARAYANA, “Methods of Predicting the Tip Clearance Effects on Axial Flow Turbomachinery,” J. Basic Eng. Trans ASME, 467 (1970).
   Google Scholar
• S. LIEBLEIN, “Incidence and Deviation Angle Correlations for Compressor Cascade,” J. Basic Eng. Trans ASME, 575 (1960).
   Google Scholar
• L. TURANSKYI, “Uber die Entwicklung und Erprobung von Axialverdichtern grosser Leistungsaufnahme für den Anlagenbau,” Atomkernenergie, 32, 4, 273 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• R. STRAUDE, “Zum Betriebsverhalten von mehrstufigen Axialverdichtern mit radialer Endstufe,” Atomkernenergie, 32, 4 279 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT and H. POSENTRUP, “The Behaviour of a Closed-Cycle Gas Turbine with Time Dependent Operating Conditions,” J. Eng. Power, 102 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• L. CAVALLARO and J. YAMPOLSKY, “Design and Development of a Steam Turbine Driven Circulator for High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 26, 135 (1974).
   Google Scholar
• H. L. BREY, “Fort St. Vrain Circulator Operating Experience,” Proc. Specialists’ Mtg. Gas-Cooled Reactor Coolant Circulator and Blower Technology, San Diego, California, November 30-December 2, 1987, International Atomic Energy Agency (1988).
   Google Scholar
• C. F. McDONALD, “Helium Compressor Aerodynamic Design Considerations for MHTGR Circulators,” Proc. Specialists’ Mtg. Gas-Cooled Reactor Coolant Circulator and Blower Technology, San Diego, California, November 30-December 2, 1987, International Atomic Energy Agency (1988).
   Google Scholar
• J. F. KIKSTRA, “Modeling, Design and Control of a Cogenerating Nuclear Gas Turbine Plant,” PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology (2001).
   Google Scholar
• K. BAMMERT and W. TWARDZIOK, “Das stationäre Betriebsverhalten von konventionell- und nuklearbeheizten Gasturbinen,” Atomkernenergie, 11, 185 (1966).
   Google Scholar
• P. ZEHNER, “Vier-quadranten-Kennfelder von Turbinen,” VDI-Forsch-Ber., 32, 93 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• T. SCHOBEIRI and M. ABOUELKHEIR, “Row by Row Off-Design Performance Calculation Method for Turbines,” J. Propul. Power, 8, 823 (1992).
   Google Scholar